Skip to content

Relationship Between the Arthroscopic Anatomy of the Middle Glenohumeral Ligament and the Rotator Cuff Tear Position

Relationship Between the Arthroscopic Anatomy of the Middle Glenohumeral Ligament and the Rotator Cuff Tear Position

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05484271
Enrollment
125
Registered
2022-08-02
Start date
2022-08-05
Completion date
2022-08-28
Last updated
2022-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tears

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Tears, Middle Glenohumeral Ligament, Arthroscopic Anatomy

Brief summary

The main aim and scope of this study is making observation and comparing the difference in the tear position in the patients suffered form rotator cuff tear with different arthroscopic anatomy of the middle glenohumeral ligament. The results may identify the influence of the middle glenohumeral ligament anatomy type on the rotator cuff tear.

Interventions

PROCEDURERotator cuff repair

The patients received the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Sponsors

RenJi Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* partial or full-thickness but reparable rotator cuff tear; * small- to large-sized rotator cuff tears being defined by DeOrio and Cofied4; * no improvements after at least 1 month of conservative treatment such as NSAIDs or corticosteroid injection.

Exclusion criteria

* massive rotator cuff tears being defined by DeOrio and Cofied; * patients with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint; * trauma or a history of surgery at the shoulder.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The arthroscopic tear position (Anetrior/Middle/Posterior)During the surgeryThe rotator cuff was divided into three parts according to the arthroscopic discovery: (1) the anterior part which contained the subsacpularis and one third of the suprascapularis forward; (2) the middle part which contained the two thirds of the suprascapularis backward and one third of the subscapularis forward; (3) the posterior part which contained two thirds of subscapularis backward and teres minor.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026