Skip to content

GnRH Agonist for Luteal Phase Support.

Comparison of Pregnancy Rates After Luteal Phase Support With GnRH Agonist Versus Progesterone - a Prospective Randomized Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05484193
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-08-02
Start date
2020-06-08
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2022-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Use of GnRH Agonist Alone for Luteal Phase Support in Fresh IVF Cycles

Brief summary

Objective To assess the the efficacy of luteal support with GnRH agonist in patients undergoing IVF in antagonist-based hcg triggered cycles compared with standard luteal support with progesterone. Design prospective randomized controled study Subjects Patients who underwent antagonist-based cycles performed in the Shaare Zedek Medical Center IVF clinic between 2020 and 2022 Intervention Intranasal GnRH-agonist or vaginal Progesterone for luteal support. Main outcome measures Pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates, ohss. The study cohort included 150 patients who underwent 164 cycles. A total of 127 cycles were included. Of them, 64 were treated with GnRH-a and 63 with progesterone. Hypothesis: This RCT suggests that GnRH-a for luteal phase support is associated with a higher positive β-hCG pregnancy rate and clinical pregnancy rate, compared with standard progesterone support in an antagonist-based protocol triggered with hCG, while maintaining a similar safety profile.

Interventions

DRUGGnRH agonist

GnRH agonist alone for luteal phase support in fresh IVF embryo transfer cycles

DRUGProgesterone

vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support

Sponsors

Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Criteria for inclusion were patients aged between 18-45 years, BMI between 19-35, infertility diagnosis of male factor, tubal factor, anovulation, unexplained and age-related. Patients with or without infertility diagnosis, who underwent IVF for PGT were also included. \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pregnancy2 weeks\- positive Bhcg

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
clinical pregnancy5 weeksgestational sac with heartbeat
ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome5 weeksearly and late

Countries

Israel

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026