Skip to content

Effects of Sleep Hygiene Education on Sleep Health in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Effects of Sleep Hygiene Education on Sleep Health in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05483920
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-08-02
Start date
2023-01-01
Completion date
2023-08-01
Last updated
2024-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Health Behavior, Sleep Habit, Good, Sleep Hygiene

Brief summary

This will be a study looking at trying to change community-dwelling older adults' behavior in regard to good sleep hygiene practices. Investigators will assess the efficacy through subjective outcome measures and objective physiological markers of good sleep through data collected with wearable technology devices.

Detailed description

Community-dwelling older adults will be recruited and placed into one of two groups. Group one will watch a one-time educational video on sleep hygiene and group two will watch the video plus be sent daily automated text messages to reinforce the education learned in the video. The participants will receive the text messages for a total of 4 weeks. The control group will not receive any intervention during this time frame. Following the initial meeting, all participants will wear the sleep tracker on their wrists during the day and night for 4 weeks. The sleep tracker will monitor the physiological markers of sleep provided by wearable technology on sleep efficiency, time in bed, time actually sleeping, and time spent at each stage of sleep. At the end of the 4-week study period, the researchers will once again meet with each participant. The participant will complete the following questionnaires once again.

Interventions

One-time educational video

BEHAVIORALOne-time educational video plus automated text messaging

Educational video plus automated text messaging

Sponsors

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
CollaboratorNIH
Black Hills State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

There will be two arms of the study including intervention and a control group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Any adult between the ages of 50 and 80 will be recruited for the study

Exclusion criteria

* Anyone with a diagnosed sleep disorder such as insomnia or obstructive sleep apnea, and the inability to wear any sleep tracking device on their wrist.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change Score From Baseline to 4-weeks for Participants' Sleep Efficiency Using Wearable Technology.Baseline, 4-week follow upSleep efficiency scores will be calculated using a sleep tracker device and are defined as time spent in bed versus time spent actually sleeping. 85% or higher is considered normal sleep efficiency. The average sleep efficiency score for the first three days at baseline and average sleep efficiency from the last 3 days of the 4 week study period will be used to gather the change score.
Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Sleep Hygiene IndexBaseline and 4-week follow upOutcome measure for good sleep hygiene. Scores range from 0-52. Higher scores equate to worse sleep hygiene.
Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Numeric Pain Rating ScaleBaseline and 4-week follow upOutcome measure for average pain levels. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores equate to higher pain levels.
Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Epworth Sleepiness ScaleBaseline and 4-week follow upOutcome measure for average daytime sleepiness. Scores range from 0-24. Higher scores equate to worse daytime sleepiness.
Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality IndexBaseline and 4-week follow upOutcome measure for quality of sleep. Score ranges 0-21 with higher score equaling poor sleep quality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Patient Specific Functional ScaleBaseline and 4-week follow upOutcome measure for overall function. The participant chooses three functional day-to-day activities that they regularly participate in and they rate those activities from 0-10 on ease or difficulty of completing. 0 indicates unable to perform the activity, and 10 indicates no problem with the activity. The total score is calculated by adding all three activity scores and dividing by the number of activities listed for a total score ranging from 0-10.
Change Scores From Baseline to 4-week Follow up for Participant's Body Mass Indexbaseline and 4-week follow upBody mass index is measured by body weight \[kg\]/ height \[m\]2) from weight and height measurements to determine healthy body anthropometrics. Normal value is 18.5 to 24.9. Above these values is considered overweight and obese, under this is considered underweight.
Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Perceived Stress ScaleBaseline and 4-week follow upOutcome measure for average stress levels. Scores range from 0-40. The higher the score the worse the stress levels.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
One-time Educational Video
A one-time educational video on best practices for good sleep hygiene One-time educational video: One-time educational video
15
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text Messaging
A one-time educational video on best practices for sleep hygiene plus daily automated text messages to reinforce habit. One-time educational video plus automated text messaging: Educational video plus automated text messaging
15
Total30

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOne-time Educational VideoOne-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
11 Participants8 Participants19 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants7 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants14 Participants27 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants14 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
15 participants15 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants12 Participants24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sleep Hygiene Index6.7 units on a scale8.7 units on a scale7.7 units on a scale

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 150 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 150 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale

Outcome measure for average daytime sleepiness. Scores range from 0-24. Higher scores equate to worse daytime sleepiness.

Time frame: Baseline and 4-week follow up

Population: average change score on ESS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale1.3 units on a scale
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale2.3 units on a scale
Primary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale

Outcome measure for average pain levels. Scores range from 0-10. Higher scores equate to higher pain levels.

Time frame: Baseline and 4-week follow up

Population: Average change score

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale0.1 units on a scale
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale0.1 units on a scale
Primary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

Outcome measure for quality of sleep. Score ranges 0-21 with higher score equaling poor sleep quality

Time frame: Baseline and 4-week follow up

Population: Change score average

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index1.6 units on a scale
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index2.5 units on a scale
Primary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Sleep Hygiene Index

Outcome measure for good sleep hygiene. Scores range from 0-52. Higher scores equate to worse sleep hygiene.

Time frame: Baseline and 4-week follow up

Population: Average change scores

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Sleep Hygiene Index5.5 units on a scale
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Sleep Hygiene Index3.5 units on a scale
Primary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-weeks for Participants' Sleep Efficiency Using Wearable Technology.

Sleep efficiency scores will be calculated using a sleep tracker device and are defined as time spent in bed versus time spent actually sleeping. 85% or higher is considered normal sleep efficiency. The average sleep efficiency score for the first three days at baseline and average sleep efficiency from the last 3 days of the 4 week study period will be used to gather the change score.

Time frame: Baseline, 4-week follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-weeks for Participants' Sleep Efficiency Using Wearable Technology.-1.34 percentage points of efficiency
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-weeks for Participants' Sleep Efficiency Using Wearable Technology.-0.2 percentage points of efficiency
Secondary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Patient Specific Functional Scale

Outcome measure for overall function. The participant chooses three functional day-to-day activities that they regularly participate in and they rate those activities from 0-10 on ease or difficulty of completing. 0 indicates unable to perform the activity, and 10 indicates no problem with the activity. The total score is calculated by adding all three activity scores and dividing by the number of activities listed for a total score ranging from 0-10.

Time frame: Baseline and 4-week follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Patient Specific Functional Scale1.3 units on a scale
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Patient Specific Functional Scale0.16 units on a scale
Secondary

Change Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Perceived Stress Scale

Outcome measure for average stress levels. Scores range from 0-40. The higher the score the worse the stress levels.

Time frame: Baseline and 4-week follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Perceived Stress Scale3.1 units on a scale
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Score From Baseline to 4-week Follow up on the Perceived Stress Scale1.9 units on a scale
Secondary

Change Scores From Baseline to 4-week Follow up for Participant's Body Mass Index

Body mass index is measured by body weight \[kg\]/ height \[m\]2) from weight and height measurements to determine healthy body anthropometrics. Normal value is 18.5 to 24.9. Above these values is considered overweight and obese, under this is considered underweight.

Time frame: baseline and 4-week follow up

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
One-time Educational VideoChange Scores From Baseline to 4-week Follow up for Participant's Body Mass Index-0.001 kg/m^2 (kilograms/meters squared)
One-time Educational Video Plus Automated Text MessagingChange Scores From Baseline to 4-week Follow up for Participant's Body Mass Index0.13 kg/m^2 (kilograms/meters squared)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026