Skip to content

Clinical Predictive Factors of Success of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation/Resection

Clinical Predictive Factors of Success of Hysteroscopic Endometrial Ablation/Resection; Retrospective Study at a Tertiary University Hospital

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05483348
Enrollment
95
Registered
2022-08-02
Start date
2022-02-17
Completion date
2022-04-28
Last updated
2022-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prognostic Factors, Treatment Failures, Uterine Bleeding

Keywords

Endometrial Ablation Technique, Uterine Bleeding, Treatment Failures, Prognostic Factors

Brief summary

To determine the predictive factors of endometrial ablation failure in the management of uterine bleeding.

Detailed description

This is a retrospective cohort study for women who have been treated with Thermal endometrial ablation due to uterine bleeding. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the possible risk factors associated with endometrial ablation failure causing patients to need subsequent gynecological procedures or undergoing hysterectomy for definitive treatment. Such efforts are made in order to anticipate the morbidity and mortality associated with patients in such conditions and to effectively stratify those patients to appropriate treatment techniques.

Interventions

Thermal endometrial ablation

PROCEDURERepeated gynecological procedure

subsequent gynecological procedures such as hysterectomy for any benign indication, D&C or repeat ablation.

Sponsors

Naser Al-Husban
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who had their endometrial ablation at Jordan University Hospital.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients whose index ablation or subsequent re-intervention could not be confirmed in detailed operative reports were excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Predictive factors of successful endometrial ablationfrom September 2016 through February 2022the outcome of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation whether it was a failure or a success; failure was defined as persistent of heavy bleeding after the ablation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The failure rate of endometrial ablation for uterine bleedingfrom September 2016 through February 2022To find the failure rate of endometrial ablation that is done for uterine bleeding
Subsequent gynecological procedures after failed ablationfrom September 2016 through February 2022To find the subsequent gynecological procedures that patients with unsuccessful ablation had

Countries

Jordan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026