Skip to content

Health-related Physical Fitness in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The Numbers Tell the Tale: the Validation of an Assessment Battery for Health-related Physical Fitness in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05482932
Enrollment
200
Registered
2022-08-01
Start date
2022-08-17
Completion date
2024-09-27
Last updated
2024-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Crohn Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Ulcerative Colitis

Keywords

Inflammatory bowel disease, Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn Disease, Health-related physical fitness

Brief summary

Rationale: Existing literature suggests an impaired health-related physical fitness (HRPF) (i.e., body composition, aerobic capacity, muscular strength, muscular endurance, and flexibility) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, previous studies did not assess HRPF with the 5- component multidimensional concept. HRPF is not routinely screened for and measured within the IBD population in clinical practice. The lack of a simple screening tool and assessment method for HRPF validated for the IBD population hinders the ability to distinguish patients with IBD with adequate physical fitness from those who might benefit from physical exercise interventions targeting specific components. Gold standard measures are too expensive and too complex to implement in daily practice and therefore a screening tool and a simpler assessment battery for HRPF validated in patients with IBD are needed. It is necessary to obtain more objective insights into the specific components of HRPF affected in patients with IBD, and its association with patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors in order to implement systematic screening in routine care and subsequently offer tailored physical exercise interventions. Objective: The main objective of this study is to validate a simple screening tool and a best-practice assessment battery for the different components of HRPF against gold standard measures. Secondary objectives are to objectively assess the incidence of specific components affected in patients with IBD compared to healthy control subjects and to explore the association between these components of HRPF affected and patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors.

Detailed description

The study involves one or two study visits for patients with IBD and only one study visit for healthy volunteers. During the first study visit, all participants (n=200) will perform the tests of the assessment battery for HRPF and complete several questionnaires. A representative subgroup of patients with IBD will undergo the gold standard measurements for HRPF during a second study visit. Furthermore, total physical activity measured by accelerometry will be measured in this subgroup of patients.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHealth-related physical fitness assessment

Participants will complete several questionnaires and perform multiple health-related physical fitness tests

Sponsors

Dutch Gastroenterology & Hepatology Foundation (Maag Lever Darm Stichting)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Maastricht University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

for all participants: * Any gender aged 18 years or older; * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II (i.e., normal healthy patient or a patient with mild systemic disease) * No contraindications for exercise testing based on the PAR-Q * Being able to provide written informed consent; * Willing and able to complete questionnaires and perform performance tests; * Being able to understand written Dutch and speak the Dutch language. Inclusion criteria specific for patients with IBD: * Certified diagnosis of IBD (UC or CD) based on the combination of endoscopic, radiological, and/or histological findings; * No active disease or experiencing mild to moderate disease activity. * Included in eHealth clinical care-pathway using myIBDcoach. Inclusion criteria specific for healthy volunteers: • No certified diagnosis of IBD (CD, UC, IBD-Unclassified);

Exclusion criteria

for all participants: * ASA Physical Status \> II (i.e., patient with severe systemic disease); * Contraindications for exercise testing based on PAR-Q * Other (temporary) injuries or severe (neuro)muscular, rheumatic, or orthopedic conditions that may interfere with study evaluations; * Current malignancy (except for local cutaneous skin cancer) or successfully treated for a malignancy in the past 6 months; * Pregnant or lactating women; * Competitive and elite athletes (i.e., ≥6 hours/week of moderate to vigorous exercise) * Not being able to understand or speak the Dutch language; * Not being able to cooperate with test procedures or unable to provide informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Biodex 4 Pro dynamometry (Only applicable for first 50 included patients with IBD)Study visit 2, 7 to 14 days after inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: peak torque
1 minute sit-to-stand testStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: repetitions
sit-and-reach testStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: cm
Deuterium oxide dilution (Only applicable for first 50 included patients with IBD)Study visit 2, 7 to 14 days after inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: % body fat, fat mass, fat free mass).
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (Only applicable for first 50 included patients with IBD)Study visit 2, 7 to 14 days after inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: VO2max/VO2peak)
Duke Activity Status IndexStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: estimated VO2peak
Veterans-Specific Activity QuestionnaireStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: estimated METs
Sum of 4 skinfold thicknessessStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: % body fat, fat mass, fat free mass
Bioelectrical impedance analysisStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: % body fat, fat mass, fat free mass
Mid upper arm circumferenceStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: cm
Waist circumferenceStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: cm
Steep ramp test (peak work rate)Study visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: peak work rate
Handgrip strengthStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: kg
Handgrip enduranceStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: seconds to task failure (sec)
Handheld dynamometryStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: peak torque

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Physical Activity QuestionnaireStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: MET min/week
Total physical activity measured with accelerometer (Only applicable for first 50 included patients with IBD)7 days (between 1st and 2nd study visit)Outcome: total physical activity, number of steps and intensity, time spent in posture and intensity
Checklist Individual StrengthStudy visit 1, at time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)Outcome: fatigue

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient characteristicsAt time of inclusion (cross sectional study design)e.g., age, gender, medical history, comorbidities, IBD phenotype, disease duration, extra-intestinal manifestation, medication use, tobacco use

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026