Skip to content

The Effect of Clamping Method the Indwelling Urinary Catheters

The Effect on Catheter-Related Complıcatıons of Clamping Method the Indwelling Urinary Catheters in ICU Patıents: A Randomızed Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05480254
Enrollment
110
Registered
2022-07-29
Start date
2021-04-15
Completion date
2022-10-30
Last updated
2022-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Training by Clamping Before Removal

Keywords

Clamping, Indwelling Urinary Catheters, Nursing

Brief summary

Background: Bladder training through catheter clamping is an important nursing practice. There is no clear information and sufficient evidence for catheter clamping in bladder training before urinary catheter removal in guidelines for clinical practice. Objective: To evaluate the results of bladder training in ICU patients. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting general surgery ıntensıve care. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned either to have their urinary catheter clamped before removal or to have their catheter removed with free drainage.. Patients who will continue to have urinary catheterization for at least 5 days were included in the study. Results: - Conclusion: -

Detailed description

Nurses are key professionals in the prevention of complications associated with indwelling urinary catheterization in the hospital setting. In this context, bladder training through catheter clamping is an important nursing practice. Indwelling catheter clamping in bladder training was first proposed by Ross in 1936. There is no clear information and sufficient evidence for catheter clamping in bladder training before urinary catheter removal in national and international guidelines for clinical practice. In a study by Williamson (1982) on this subject, it was reported that intermittent clamping before removal of the indwelling urinary catheter reduces the frequency of urinary retention and shortens the time to return to normal bladder function. However, a systematic review published in Cochrane (2007) on strategies for removal of short-term indwelling urethral catheters in adults found insufficient evidence to suggest that catheter clamping prior to termination of catheterization is effective to induce normal bladder filling. In another systematic review published in Cochrane (2016), there was no significant difference between the patients' subjective perceptions of recatheterization, urinary retention, catheter-related urinary tract infection and urination symptoms in the clamping and free drainage groups. In the limited number of studies on bladder training performed by clamping the indwelling urinary catheter, no evidence for practice could be obtained, and there is no consensus among clinicians yet. Ultimately, more research, better quality methodology, and more diverse study designs are needed until strong evidence is available to remove this uncertainty.

Interventions

OTHERclamped catheter

Q3 clamped catheter protocol is applied before urinary catheter removal

Sponsors

Cumhuriyet University
CollaboratorOTHER
Hulya Kocyigit
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Glasgow Coma Scale between 13-15 when clamping will be performed. * Within the first 12 hours of admission to the intensive care unit, * Will continue urinary catheterization for at least 5 days, * No diagnosed or recurrent urinary tract infection, * Patients who agreed to participate in the study by obtaining their informed consent and who will not leave the study during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Having urinary outflow resistance/difficulty (prostate enlargement, urethral stenosis, etc.), * Those who have suprapubic catheters or who will undergo intermittent catheterization, * Patients with impaired nerve conduction, * Patients taking anticholinergic drug therapy such as tricyclic antidepressants, * Patients receiving sympathomimetric drug therapy, * Having a neurogenic bladder, * Having diabetic cystopathy, Have a previous history of urinary retention or urination dysfunction,

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Enfectious complications1-5 daysCatheter-Related Infectious Complications Follow-up Form

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Other complications6. days 1-12 hour betweenCatheter-Related Non-Infectious Complications Follow-up Form

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

Primary ContactHülya Kocyigit, Phd
kcygthulya@outlook.com905550408876
Backup ContactSerife KARAGOZOGLU, Prof.Dr
serifekaragozoglu@gmail.com903464870000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026