Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Using Empathy Courses to Guide OT Students in Case-base Clinical Reasoning

The Effectiveness of Using Empathy Experience Courses to Guide Occupational Therapy Students in Case-base Clinical Reasoning- A Pilot Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05479110
Enrollment
30
Registered
2022-07-29
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
2023-11-30
Last updated
2022-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Students

Brief summary

Clinical reasoning is an important cognitive process in medical decision making. In recent years, medical education advocates holistic medicine, but systematic learning is rare in school education.Therefore, this study used an empathy experience course to conduct a case-oriented clinical reasoning training course to improve the empathy and clinical reasoning skills of pre-clinical students in occupational therapy through four sessions.

Detailed description

Objective: To investigate effectiveness of using empathy experience courses to guide the students who prior to occupational therapy(OT) practice in case-base clinical reasoning. Materials and Methods: 30 students were recruited from 8 universities in Taiwan and randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group was given four 3-hour training sessions over 2 weeks, which included group instruction on empathy experience, clinical reasoning, and functional therapy case-oriented learning, while the control group was given case studies. Tests were administered before and after the series of sessions, including case report writing, C-JES-HPS, SACRR, and a follow-up visit at the end of the first phase of clinical practice using the C-JES-HPS and SACRR; course satisfaction surveys were completed after each session and at the follow-up visit to observe course satisfaction, usefulness, and recommendations. Data were analyzed using SPSS (version 20.0) with a significance level of 0.05. Univariate analyses with repeated measures 2-way analysis of variance were used to compare changes in empathy and clinical reasoning ability between the two groups of subjects and course satisfaction was presented as descriptive statistics. It was hypothesized that a case-oriented clinical reasoning training program using an empathy experience program would improve empathy and clinical reasoning skills in pre-practicum students in occupational therapy.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALEmpathy experience courses and case-base clinical reasoning

Four 3-hour training sessions over 2 weeks, which included group instruction on empathy experience, clinical reasoning, and functional therapy case-oriented learning.

OTHERcase studies

active control: case studies(text)

Sponsors

Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Occupational therapy students from National Taiwan University, Kaohsiung Medical University, Sun Yat-sen Medical University, National Cheng Kung University, Chang Gung University, IShou University, Fu Jen Catholic University, and Asia University who have completed their major credits and will be interning in a clinical hospital. * Must be at least 20 years old and under 65 years old.

Exclusion criteria

* Those who are unable to attend the whole course. * Those who have not completed their school credits and are unable to go to the clinical hospital for internship. * Those who do not speak Chinese or English as their native language.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chinese version of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Profession StudentsChange from Baseline at 2 weeksA total of 20 questions were used to self-assess participants' empathy status and were scored using a 7-point Likert scale. The content covered three sections, including 10 questions on the perspective taking section, 8 questions on the compassionate care section, and 2 questions on standing in the patient's shoes.
The Self-Assessment of Clinical Reflection and ReasoningChange from Baseline at 2 weeksA 26-item, five-point Likert scale was used to self-assess clinical reasoning skills, including strongly disagree, disagree, unsure, agree, and strongly agree.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satisfaction Questionnaireup to 2 weeksThe researchers designed the form to understand the subjects' satisfaction with the content of the training course, the usefulness of the training course for clinical practice, and their suggestions for the training course. Satisfaction with the content of the training course and the usefulness of the training course for clinical practice were rated on a five-point Likert scale of very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, fair, satisfied, and very satisfied.

Countries

Taiwan

Contacts

Primary ContactHanyun Hsiao, master
10252@s.tmu.edu.tw+88622490088

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026