Brain Injury, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
Conditions
Keywords
cognition, intervention, brain injury, emotion recognition, post traumatic stress disorder
Brief summary
Poor emotion recognition has been associated with poor quality of interpersonal relationships, loss of employment, behavioral problems, reduced social reintegration, social isolation and even suicide. Deficits in emotion recognition are common in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but these deficits have not been well studied in Veterans with both mild TBI (mTBI) and PTSD. Currently there are no interventions for emotion recognition in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, and interventions for severe TBI have lacked training of both facial and vocal emotion recognition. In a preliminary study of an innovative combination of facial and vocal modalities, a multimodal affect recognition training (MMART) showed promise but lacked attention training that is an essential component in recognizing emotions in our daily lives. Given the need to improve relationships and productivity in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, a study is needed to determine the effectiveness of a MMART combined with attention training.
Detailed description
Background. Deficits in emotion recognition are common in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and in post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but these deficits have not been well studied in Veterans with both mild TBI (mTBI) and PTSD. Poor emotion recognition has been associated with poor quality of interpersonal relationships, loss of employment, behavioral problems, reduced social reintegration, social isolation and even suicide. Currently there are no interventions for emotion recognition deficits in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, and interventions conducted in civilians with severe TBI have lacked training of both facial and vocal emotion recognition. In a preliminary study of an innovative combination of facial and vocal modalities, a multimodal affect recognition training (MMART) showed promise with significant improvement on the Florida Affect Battery (FAB) but lacked attention training that is an essential component in recognizing rapidly changing emotions in our everyday lives. Attention training using Brain HQ targets the required attention factors underlying emotion recognition. Given the need to improve relationships and productivity in Veterans with mTBI and PTSD, a randomized controlled trial is needed to determine the effectiveness of an innovative MMART combined with attention training to improve emotion recognition and everyday function. Objective & Hypotheses. The objective of this randomized controlled trial is to determine the treatment effect of a MultiModal Affect Recognition Training (MMART) combined with attention training in Veterans with TBI/PTSD. Hypothesis 1. MMART combined with attention training will significantly improve performance on tests of emotion recognition. Hypothesis 2: Treatment gains will translate to functional activities. Primary measures. Florida Affect Battery (FAB) and the Community Reintegration in Service members (CRIS). Secondary measures. Emotion Recognition Task (ERT), attention index of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), the Continuous Performance Task and the TBI Quality of Life (TBI-QOL) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities. Methods. 20 Veterans with mTBI and PTSD will be randomized to either the combined training or an inactive control group. Both groups will attend 16, one-hour in-person sessions over 8 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at pre-, post-, 3 month-post-treatment. A linear regression will be used to determine significant improvement of the treatment group over the control group, with t-tests to demonstrate within group improvement. Effect size calculations will be used to determine the power needed for a future Merit proposal.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALMultimodal affect recognition training
8 session, trains participants to recognize expression of emotion from a variety of stimuli, including dynamic stimuli (e.g., video instead of still pictures) and it employs both facial and vocal examples of emotion expression.
BEHAVIORALAttention Training
computerized attention drill training
BEHAVIORALBrain Health Workshop
an education presentation on brain function and cognitive principles of learning with homework and quizzes on information covered.
BEHAVIORALNational Geographic Movies
participant will watch movies and answer questions after
Sponsors
VA Office of Research and Development
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
20 Veterans with mTBI and PTSD will be randomized to multimodal and attention training or inactive control arm.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Veterans with a diagnosis of mTBI and PTSD based on VA/Department of Defense guidelines. * Emotion recognition deficit * Attention deficit * Corrected vision within normal limits * Hearing within normal limits * Fluent in English
Exclusion criteria
* premorbid history of schizophrenia * bipolar disorder * chronic medical or neurological diseases
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Florida Affect Battery (FAB), assessing change | week 1, week 11, week 22 | a standardized assessment of emotional affect and prosody recognition. normative scores range from 0-100 for each of the 12 subscales. Higher scores indicate better emotion recognition. |
| Community Reintegration of Service Members, assessing change | week 1, week 11, week 22 | Satisfaction questionnaire of community participation. Scores range from .43 to 2.15. 43 items with five rating options of 1-5. Higher scores indicate better community participation. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Emotion Recognition Task, assessing change | week 1, week 11, week 22 | computerized assessment of emotional affect recognition. Correct responses range from 0-48 (higher scores indicate better emotion recognition) and correct response time ranges from 0 to infinity (lower scores indicate quicker response time). |
| Continuous Performance Task, assessing change | week 1, week 11, week 22 | computerized measures of sustained attention. 100 trials with accuracy ranging from 0-100 (higher scores indicate better attention) and response time from 0-60 (lower scores indicate quicker response time). |
| Attention Index of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status, assessing change | week 1, week 11, week 22 | digit span and symbol digit to assess attention. Scaled scores range from 1-19, with higher scores indicating better attention. |
| Traumatic Brain injury quality of life | week 1, week 11, week 22 | quality of life questionnaire about community participation. 59 items with scores ranging from 59-295, with higher scores indicating better community participation. |
Countries
United States
Contacts
Primary ContactJulia K Waid-Ebbs, PhD
Backup ContactMargaret H McCallum
Outcome results
None listed