Skip to content

Cannabinoid vs Opioid for Photorefractive Keratectomy Pain Control

Randomized, Controlled Cross-over Comparison of Cannabinoid to Oral Opioid for Postoperative Photorefractive Keratectomy Pain Control

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05477875
Enrollment
35
Registered
2022-07-28
Start date
2024-02-01
Completion date
2025-01-22
Last updated
2025-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperopia, Myopia, Photorefractive Keratectomy

Brief summary

Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) is a commonly performed corneal refractive surgery but has significant post-operative pain. Pain medications after PRK are typically opioid-acetaminophen combinations. Alternatives to opioid medication are worth consideration. Patients will receive PRK in each eye sequentially, using the cannabinoid or codeine/acetaminophen for one eye and the other treatment for the fellow eye two weeks later.

Interventions

DRUGoral cannabinoid

dronabinol

COMBINATION_PRODUCToral codeine/acetaminophen

10 tablets of acetaminophen-codeine combination (300-30mg) without refills.

Sponsors

Consortium for Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults older than 18 years with refractive stability for 1 year electing to have PRK surgery * Consenting to participate * Not meeting

Exclusion criteria

will be included in the study population.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After First Surgery1 week after first surgeryThe Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale is a pain scale that was developed by Donna Wong and Connie Baker. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or no hurt, to a crying face at 10, which represents hurts like the worst pain imaginable
Pain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After Second Surgery1 week after second surgeryThe Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale is a pain scale that was developed by Donna Wong and Connie Baker. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or no hurt, to a crying face at 10, which represents hurts like the worst pain imaginable

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life Refractive Correction Survey3 monthsThe QIRC measures quality of life associated with vision and eyewear problems, measured at 3 months. It ranges from 0-100, where 0 indicates best possible vision and quality of life and 100 indicates worst possible vision and quality of life.
Uncorrected Visual Acuity of First Eye Surgery3 months after first surgeryUncorrected visual acuity as measured by Snellen Chart
Uncorrected Visual Acuity of Second Eye Surgery3 months after second surgeryUncorrected visual acuity as measured by Snellen Chart
Ocular Discomfort Questionnaire3 monthsAn online questionnaire derived from the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at 3 months. It ranges from 0-48, where 0 indicates no eye discomfort and 48 indicates constant, debilitating, worst-possible eye discomfort or pain.
PROWL-SS3 monthAn online questionnaire derived from the Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) will be given to patients after PRK at 3 months. It ranges from 0-100, where 100 indicates best possible vision and satisfaction, while 0 indicates worst possible vision and satisfaction.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Thirty-five myopic patients were recruited and had surgery for both eyes completed between 1/1/2024 and 12/31/2024. Patients seeking refractive surgery and who were candidates for photorefractive keratectomy were approached with the option to enroll in the ophthalmology clinic.

Pre-assignment details

Any patient who could not undergo surgery due to contraindications such as thin cornea, irregular astigmatism, or inability to lay flat were excluded. Patients who could not undergo sequential eye surgery due to scheduling constraints could not enroll in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1
Group 1 patients had 50mg CBD chemovar twice a day by mouth after their first photorefractive surgery on one eye, then later had Tylenol T3 30-300mg three times a day by mouth after their second surgery on the fellow eye.
16
Group 2
Group 2 patients had Tylenol T3 30-300mg three times a day by mouth after their first photorefractive surgery on one eye, then later had 50mg CBD chemovar twice a day by mouth after their second surgery on the fellow eye.
19
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1Group 2Total
Age, Continuous34.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
30.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
32.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants19 Participants35 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants10 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants9 Participants16 Participants
Visual Acuity
With glasses or contacts
-0.062 LogMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.085
0.026 LogMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.338
-0.014 LogMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.257
Visual Acuity
without glasses or contacts
1.109 LogMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.452
1.290 LogMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.475
1.207 LogMAR
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 350 / 35
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 350 / 35
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 350 / 35

Outcome results

Primary

Pain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After First Surgery

The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale is a pain scale that was developed by Donna Wong and Connie Baker. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or no hurt, to a crying face at 10, which represents hurts like the worst pain imaginable

Time frame: 1 week after first surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolPain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After First Surgery1.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.95
Tylenol T3Pain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After First Surgery1.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
p-value: 0.538Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Pain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After Second Surgery

The Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale is a pain scale that was developed by Donna Wong and Connie Baker. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, or no hurt, to a crying face at 10, which represents hurts like the worst pain imaginable

Time frame: 1 week after second surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolPain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After Second Surgery1.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Tylenol T3Pain as Recorded by the FACES Scale (Maximum) After Second Surgery1.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.12
p-value: 0.538ANOVA
Secondary

Ocular Discomfort Questionnaire

An online questionnaire derived from the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) at 3 months. It ranges from 0-48, where 0 indicates no eye discomfort and 48 indicates constant, debilitating, worst-possible eye discomfort or pain.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Surveys assess overall quality of life which cannot be specifically attributed to a single eye since vision is binocular. For example, having excellent vision in one eye and poor vision in the other can be more disturbing than having poor vision in both eyes or cause patients to suffer from double vision. Because all survey measurements are implied to be binocular at 3 months after both surgeries are done, results are displayed by group instead of intervention. There is no separate measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolOcular Discomfort QuestionnairePre-op4.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.7
CannabidiolOcular Discomfort QuestionnairePost-op Month 34.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.8
Tylenol T3Ocular Discomfort QuestionnairePre-op4.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Tylenol T3Ocular Discomfort QuestionnairePost-op Month 33.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4
p-value: 0.725ANOVA
Secondary

PROWL-SS

An online questionnaire derived from the Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) will be given to patients after PRK at 3 months. It ranges from 0-100, where 100 indicates best possible vision and satisfaction, while 0 indicates worst possible vision and satisfaction.

Time frame: 3 month

Population: Surveys assess overall quality of life which cannot be specifically attributed to a single eye since vision is binocular. For example, having excellent vision in one eye and poor vision in the other can be more disturbing than having poor vision in both eyes or cause patients to suffer from double vision. Because all survey measurements are implied to be binocular at 3 months after both surgeries are done, results are displayed by group instead of intervention. There is no separate measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolPROWL-SSPre-op58.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.1
CannabidiolPROWL-SSPost-op Month 381.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9
Tylenol T3PROWL-SSPre-op60.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Tylenol T3PROWL-SSPost-op Month 385.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.9
p-value: <0.851ANOVA
Secondary

Quality of Life Refractive Correction Survey

The QIRC measures quality of life associated with vision and eyewear problems, measured at 3 months. It ranges from 0-100, where 0 indicates best possible vision and quality of life and 100 indicates worst possible vision and quality of life.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: Surveys assess overall quality of life which cannot be specifically attributed to a single eye since vision is binocular. For example, having excellent vision in one eye and poor vision in the other can be more disturbing than having poor vision in both eyes or cause patients to suffer from double vision. Because all survey measurements are implied to be binocular at 3 months after both surgeries are done, results are displayed by group instead of intervention. There is no separate measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolQuality of Life Refractive Correction SurveyPre-op37.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.2
CannabidiolQuality of Life Refractive Correction SurveyPost-op Month 319.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Tylenol T3Quality of Life Refractive Correction SurveyPre-op37.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Tylenol T3Quality of Life Refractive Correction SurveyPost-op Month 326.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.3
p-value: <0.543ANOVA
Secondary

Uncorrected Visual Acuity of First Eye Surgery

Uncorrected visual acuity as measured by Snellen Chart

Time frame: 3 months after first surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolUncorrected Visual Acuity of First Eye Surgery-0.123 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.119
Tylenol T3Uncorrected Visual Acuity of First Eye Surgery-0.054 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.169
p-value: 0.516ANOVA
Secondary

Uncorrected Visual Acuity of Second Eye Surgery

Uncorrected visual acuity as measured by Snellen Chart

Time frame: 3 months after second surgery

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
CannabidiolUncorrected Visual Acuity of Second Eye Surgery-0.051 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.16
Tylenol T3Uncorrected Visual Acuity of Second Eye Surgery-0.075 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.121
p-value: 0.516ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026