Local Anesthesia
Conditions
Keywords
buffered, sodium bicarbonate, inferior alveolar nerve block, pain, pulpotomy, articaine
Brief summary
This study will test the effectiveness of addition of Sodium Bicarbonate as a buffering agent to the anaesthetic solution on minimizing the pain of injection and increasing the onset time and potency of the anaesthetic solution in children
Detailed description
27 healthy cooperative children will be enrolled in the study after taking their guardians' informed consent. The study design will be a split mouth design where each patient will be received buffered anaesthetic solution (8.4% sodium bicarbonate will be added to the anaesthetic solution in ratio 1:19) in one side and conventional anaesthetic solution (4% articaine HCL with 1:1000000 epinephrine) in the other side. The pain during injection for each patient in both sides will be then compared using objective and subjective methods. The onset time of the anaesthesia in both sides will also be compared for each patient using Transcutaneous electric nerve stimulator device (TENS) The results will be collected and mentioned.
Interventions
Buffered local anesthesia will be administered after being previously prepared just before the injection time. Buffering Local Anesthetic Solutions Using 8.4% Sodium Bicarbonate in a 19:1 Ratio: Using the REMOVE AND REPLACE hand buffering method -Under sterile conditions, 0.09 mL of local anesthetic solution will be removed from the cartridge using a 0.5 mL syringe with a 28- gauge, 0.5-inch needle (Kendall Monoject Insulin Syringe \[Tyco Healthcare, tyco.com\] lot number 027501). Using a separate unused syringe, 0.09 mL of the commercially available 8.4% sodium bicarbonate will be removed from the 50 mL vial and immediately injected into the local anesthetic cartridge. The cartridge will be inverted 5 times to mix the solution, and no precipitation will be present.
DRUGConventional Unbuffered Local Anesthesia
The control group will receive the unbuffered conventional anaesthetic solution
Sponsors
Alexandria University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Intervention model description
Split Mouth Design
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Age range from 5 - 7 years. * Children free of any systemic disease or special health care need (ASA I). * No previous bad dental experience. * Positive or definitely positive behaviour during preoperative assessments according to the Frankl Rating Scale (score 3 or 4) * Patients whom their lower primary molars bilaterally are indicated for pulpotomy. * Patients whom their parents will give consent to participate. * Patients who give multiple reliable responses while using the transcutaneous electric nerve stimulator device.
Exclusion criteria
* Active sites of pathosis in area of injection that could affect anaesthetic assessment. * History of allergy to local anaesthesia. * Root resorption affecting more than one third of the root length. * Fractured crowns due to trauma. * Clinical signs and symptoms of pulp degeneration such as swelling or sinus tracts * Radiographic evidence of periapical or interradicular radiolucency * Non restorable crowns. * Signs of mobility. * Ankylosed roots.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain during inferior alveolar nerve block injection | during local anesthesia administration | Sound, Eye, Motor (SEM) Scale (Appendix II), will be used as an objective method for pain assessment. It comprises the following parameters: (1) Sound, (2) Eye, (3) Motor. For each child, the sounds, eye symptoms and body movements will be evaluated by the operator using the recorded video tapes. The slightest manifestations of the sound, eyes, or motion of the patient is graded in four levels: comfort, mild, moderate, and severe discomfort, and subsequently given grades 1 (comfort), 2 (mild discomfort), 3 (moderate discomfort), and 4 (severe discomfort), respectively. SEM score will be calculated by summing the three grades of the parameters |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the onset time of the Anaesthesia | after local anesthesia administration | Current Perception Threshold (CPT) detection using Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulator (TENS) device. CPT baseline value is the lowest intensity at which the patient first report feeling the stimulus. It determines the Sensory Threshold (ST), which corresponds to the lowest current intensity capable of eliciting perception. The electrode will be placed on the proposed measuring site and the device will be turned on. The device will start the delivery of current at the lowest output intensity and then slowly increased until the patient reported feeling the stimulus. Patients will be instructed to state if they feel any sensation, at that time the delivery of electrical current will be terminated and CPT intensity will be recorded. Every 30 seconds after administration of anaesthesia, while set at the baseline CPT intensity recording for each patient, the electrode will be applied to the proposed measuring site on the anesthetized side, to detect the time of onset of anaesthesia. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the effectiveness of the anaesthesia | after local anesthesia administration | This will be determined through completion of the procedure without pain with no need for additional anaesthetic injection. |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed