Gingival Recession
Conditions
Keywords
Gingival recession, Sutures, Root coverage, Healing
Brief summary
The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate whether suturing protocols (suture removal timing) influence root coverage outcomes in recession defects treated with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedure.
Detailed description
The aim of this study is to assess whether the timing of suture removal may influence the number of sites exhibiting complete coverage (CRC) or the mean root coverage (MRC) obtained in single-tooth recession-type defects treated by coronally advanced flap (CAF). Records from patients that underwent a coronally advanced flap (CAF) procedure for root coverage will be analyzed. This surgical procedure is aimed at the treatment of root recessions that may arise following periodontal disease or mechanical trauma. The procedure, after obtaining deep local anesthesia, involves a sulcular incision on the buccal side and extending the incision mesially and distally to the base of the adjacent papillae. Two vertical incisions are then made at the corner of the adjacent tooth line and extended into the alveolar mucosa. A mixed thickness flap is then elevated and coronally advanced by releasing incisions through the periosteum to allow for flap placement to cover the recession without tension. The papillae are de-epithelized to provide the bed of connective tissue for the adaptation of the flap which is then sutured with single stitches. The records, complete with photographic documentation, of all patients who have undergone this procedure will be identified and will be divided into two groups: those in which the sutures were removed at 2 weeks and those in which the sutures were removed at 3 or more weeks. CRC as present or absent (yes/no) and MRC (percentage of roof surface that has been successfully covered) six months after surgery will be assessed in these patients. The presence of patient discomfort on the day of suture removal will be recorded as present / absent to assess whether the permanence of the sutures for longer or shorter influences the patient's perception of the surgery. The results will be compared between the two groups.
Interventions
PROCEDURESuture removal after Coronally Positioned Flap
Sutures are removed after different healing period post coronally positioned flap surgery, this latter is a procedure that aims at surgically advancing the gingiva in order to cover dehiscences of the soft tissues uncovering dental roots.
Sponsors
University of Cagliari
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Retrospective cohort study
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients not affected by active periodontitis * Single recessions on non-restored non-molar teeth * CAF protocols using vertical releasing incisions * records of patients clearly reporting timing of suture removals and root coverage outcomes at 6 months
Exclusion criteria
* Adjacent recessions * Recessions on molar teeth * Coronally advanced flaps without releasing incisions * Patients with active periodontitis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Complete Root Coverage | 6 months | Achievement of 100% root coverage, measured as yes / no |
| Mean Root Coverage | 6 months | Percentage of the root recession that has been successfully covered after the surgical procedure |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient discomfort | at suture removal | Discomfort reported by the patient (present/absent) |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed