Skip to content

CIED Infection Quality Initiative Demonstration Project

The Review and Improvement of Cardiac Implantable Device Infection Quality Initiative (RECTIFY) Demonstration Project

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05471973
Acronym
RECTIFY
Enrollment
200
Registered
2022-07-25
Start date
2023-05-10
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infections

Keywords

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices, Quality improvement

Brief summary

The aim of this Quality Initiative (QI) demonstration project is to develop a model to increase guideline-driven care for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) infection. Multidisciplinary teams will be established to carry out the multifaceted intervention. This program seeks to improve early identification and diagnosis, appropriate treatment, and faster time to treatment of CIED infection.

Detailed description

Retrospective data will be collected pre-intervention. The interventions will then be implemented for a total of six months and will continue through the data collection period. Prospective data collection will start three months after the intervention is started and will continue for a total of 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERMultidisciplinary Team

Multidisciplinary team will be established that will define gaps in care, monitor ongoing data, identify barriers to guideline-directed care, and develop and implement multifaceted intervention to address the barriers

An outreach visit consulting group from the coordinating center and trial leadership will provide external guidance on reviewing data, defining barriers, and implementing interventions

These interventions are not limited to targeted engagement with non-extractors, electronic health record (EHR) decision support, creation of OR block time, use of opinion leaders, and development of clinical pathways. In addition, once patients are identified and referred to extraction centers, clinical pathways are needed to provide prompt care without clinical delay

OTHERMeasurement and Feedback

The coordinating center will provide ongoing feedback related to the site's data. This will include time to diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes related to the device infection.

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER
Duke Clinical Research Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
Philips Healthcare
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) in place * Presumed CIED infection, as defined by: 1. Positive blood culture (two or more positive blood cultures for typical skin organisms (coagulase-negative staphylococci, Corynebacterium species, Propionobacterium species), or one positive blood culture for all other microorganisms), with no other source identified to explain the bacteremia 2. Cases with definite evidence of pocket infection (defined as localized erythema, swelling, pain, tenderness, warmth, erosion, or drainage), if treated with antibiotics before culture, even with negative culture, will be considered device infection

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who are inappropriate for device extraction, for example those who are DNAR and not using therapy to prolong survival because any procedure is considered inappropriate and/or it is unlikely that extraction would change overall prognosis * Death within one week of definitive CIED systemic infection diagnosis or positive blood culture. Cases of bacteremia originating from a source other than the CIED that resolve without any evidence of CIED involvement should not be considered as CIED infection * Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with CIEDs and positive blood cultures who receive extraction (per guidelines)Up to 12 monthsProportion of patients with CIEDs and positive blood cultures, who receive extraction
Proportion of patients with CIEDs and definite pocket infections who receive extraction (per guidelines)Up to 12 monthsProportion of patients with CIEDs and probable device infection, who receive extraction

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients with extraction within 7 days of diagnosisUp to 12 monthsProportion of patients who who receive extraction within 7 days and during index hospitalization
Proportion of patients with extraction during index hospitalizationUp to 12 months
Time from positive blood culture/clear pocket infection to extraction for those undergoing extractionUp to 12 months
Number of patients identified with suspected CIED infectionUp to 12 months
Number of patients referred to both Extraction Center (from outside hospital) and electrophysiologists (at Extraction Center) for extractionUp to 12 months
Number of actual extractionsUp to 12 months
Number of patients with multi-organ failure or septic shock at time of extractionUp to 12 months
Estimated healthcare utilization/costsUp to 12 months
Staff satisfaction as measured by a qualitative surveyUp to 12 months
Patient satisfaction as measured by a qualitative surveyUp to 12 months

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTKimberly Ward, MPH
kimberly.t.ward@duke.edu9196606409
CONTACTSarah Brady
sarah.brady@duke.edu9196818928
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChris Granger, MD

Duke Clinical Research Institute

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSean Pokorney, MD

Duke Clinical Research Institute

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: May 7, 2026