Skip to content

Everbeat Ring ECG Clinical Concordance Study

Correlation of Electrocardiographic Signals Acquired by a Finger-worn ECG Sensor With a Standard 12-Lead ECG

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05469542
Enrollment
65
Registered
2022-07-21
Start date
2022-08-01
Completion date
2022-09-20
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases

Keywords

ECG, Wearables, Electrocardiography

Brief summary

This study is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in patients referred for routine ECG, to compare output from the everbeat finger-worn ECG device to standard of care (SOC) 12-lead electrocardiography. No intervention is involved in this study. Patients visiting the study site during the study period will be assessed for eligibility on a convenience basis, and observational data will be recorded on those eligible.

Interventions

DEVICEEverbeat Ring

The primary objective of this study is to assess the concordance of specific ECG parameters obtained in the everbeat nine-lead ECG waveform with those obtained in the comparable leads from a standard 12-lead ECG recorder.

Sponsors

Grektek Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females aged 18 to 90 years. * Under the care of a board-certified physician and referred for a routine electrocardiogram (ECG) * Resting heart rate between 50 to 120 beats per minute (BPM).

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to wear the everbeat ring. * Prior history of movement disorders including Parkinson's or benign tremors. * Prior history of allergic skin reactions to metal including stainless steel.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
R-wave Amplitude50 daysR Peak Amplitude intraclass correlation coefficient between test and reference devices in mm
ST-segment50 DaysConcordance in ST-segment deviation from the TP segment if present in mm
Blinded Cardiologist Review50 DaysIdentify the first six consecutive distinct readable PQRST complexes without artifacts that match between the strips for evaluation. Each reviewer will assign a pass/fail to the strips by visually assessing all 6 PQRST complexes. A pass is given when the morphology of the PQRST complexes appears to overlay to the unaided eye. A measurement of the R amplitude from the isoelectric baseline to the nearest millimeter for the first two QRS complexes in both the reference strip and everbeat strip. The reviewers will be blinded to the identity of the reference strip and everbeat strip.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
User acceptance survey50 daysTo assess the ease of use of the everbeat ring in a random selection of users.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026