Skip to content

Serotonin Receptor Blockers in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Blocking the Effects of Serotonin to Prevent Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: a Randomized Trial (CYPRO-MR)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05469165
Acronym
CYPRO-MR
Enrollment
214
Registered
2022-07-21
Start date
2023-06-20
Completion date
2027-09-30
Last updated
2023-11-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Keywords

Ischemic mitral regurgitation, Myocardial infarction, Mitral valve, Serotonin, Cyproheptadine

Brief summary

This study is intended to investigate the effect of cyproheptadine (a 5HT2B receptor blocker) on mitral regurgitation severity.

Detailed description

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common and morbid complication of myocardial infarction (MI), doubling heart failure and mortality with currently limited therapies. Its mechanisms have been previously linked to left ventricle (LV) remodeling with secondary deformation of otherwise normal mitral leaflets. Recent studies are introducing new mechanistic elements, allowing possibilities for potential pharmacotherapeutic approaches. Normal mitral leaflets have the capacity to enlarge and adapt to even the largest LV dilatation to prevent MR. However, this compensatory mechanism is insufficient after MI, and the leaflets are abnormally thick with fibrotic changes. Those fibrotic changes could be related to a variation in blood serotonin (5-HT) levels after MI, which has been previously reported. Serotonin is a known cause of valve fibrosis through its 5HT type 2B receptor. In sheep models, the investigators have tested the hypothesis that a 5HT type 2B receptor blocker (cyproheptadine) can prevent adverse remodeling in the valve after MI. Cyproheptadine treatment was associated with increased valve leaflet surface, attenuated leaflet thickening and collagen deposition. Importantly, treated animals had less MR compared to non-treated animals. Thus the present study is a double-blind randomized trial to assess the effect of cyproheptadine on MR severity, mitral valve surface variation, and left ventricular size following MI. Serial imaging (3D echo and MRI) will assess valve adaptation, LV remodeling and MR.

Interventions

DRUGCyproheptadine 4 Mg Oral Tablet

Cyproheptadine treatment for 3 months

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo administration for 3months

Sponsors

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Laval University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients 18-80 years old with a 1st episode of STEMI with documented coronary obstruction. 2. Left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF)\<50% and mitral tenting area ≥ 4 cm2, OR LVEF ≤ 40% and inferior/posterior wall motion anomaly, OR LVEF≤30% and wall motion in any territory.

Exclusion criteria

1. Inability to provide informed consent 2. Hemodynamic instability / cardiogenic shock / papillary muscle rupture 3. Prior mitral valve procedure/surgery 4. Permanent atrial fibrillation (limiting imaging and MR quantification) 5. Primary mitral disease (endocarditis, rheumatic, degenerative or congenital) 6. More than mild valvular disease (other than mitral) at baseline 7. Planned cardiac surgery (CABG or valve intervention) within 3 months 8. Contraindications for MRI 9. Ongoing treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) 10. Chronic use of sedative medication 11. Ongoing or planned pregnancy 12. Chronic renal failure with Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) \< 30 mL/min 13. Neurocognitive disorder 14. Symptom or prior episode of urinary obstruction or glaucoma (relative contraindications for cyproheptadine)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mitral regurgitation severityBaseline, 3 monthsIncidence of more than mild MR (MRI regurgitant fraction ≥ 20%) at 3 months (measured by MRI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in mitral regurgitation gradeBaseline, 3 monthsMitral regurgitation grade (measured by echocardiography). Mitral regurgitation is graded on a scale of I-IV (grade I (mild MR), grade II (moderate MR), grade III (moderate-to-severe MR) and grade IV (severe MR)). A higher mitral regurgitation grade is generally associated with a worse outcome for the patient.
Change in left ventricle sizeBaseline, 3 monthsLeft ventricle size (measured by MRI )
Change in left ventricle functionBaseline, 3 monthsLeft ventricle function (measured by MRI )
Incidence of other valve regurgitation3 monthsIncidence of other valve regurgitation (more than mild) (measured by echocardiography)
Change in mitral valve thicknessBaseline, 3 monthsMitral valve thickness (measured by echocardiography)
Adverse events3 months and 1 yearComposite of: Mortality, Heart failure requiring hospital admission, Mitral valve intervention (surgical/percutaneous)
Change in mitral leaflet sizeBaseline, 3 monthsMitral leaflet size (3D echo) and its variation vs baseline (measured by echocardiography)
Bleeding events3 months and 1 yearBleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition
Change in weight of participantsBaseline, 3 monthsWeight gain during therapy (self-assessment by participants)
Change in the patient's perception of their health statusBaseline, 3 monthsSelf-administered questionnaire : Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). All score are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale (lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life).
Change in the functional capacity of participants3 months, 1 year6-minutes walk test
Incidence of sedationBaseline, 3 monthsIncidence of sedation (reported by participants)
Change in depression scoreBaseline, 3 monthsSelf-administered questionnaire: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). The Patient Health Questionnaire has a scale of 0-27, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome for the patient, with more severe depression symptoms.
Ischemic events3 months and 1 yearstroke and myocardial infarction

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactJonathan Beaudoin, MD
jonathan.beaudoin@criucpq.ulaval.ca(418) 656-8711
Backup ContactOns Marsit, PhD
ons.marsit.1@ulaval.ca(418) 656-8711

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026