Skip to content

RCT Comparing EVLA Versus Polidocanol Foam in the Treatment of SSV Insufficiency

Three-year Outcomes of a RCT Comparing EVLA Versus Polidocanol Foam in the Treatment of SSV Insufficiency (FOVELASS Study, by the French Society of Phlebology)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05468450
Acronym
FOVELASS
Enrollment
161
Registered
2022-07-21
Start date
2015-07-01
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2022-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Varicose Veins of Lower Limb

Keywords

small saphenous veins, varicose veins, ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation

Brief summary

FOVELASS is a multicentre-RCT (11 centres) comparing ultrasound-guided-foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) for treating SSV insufficiency, conducted by the French Society of Phlebology.

Detailed description

Saphenous vein insufficiency is a common finding in varicose veins cases. International guidelines currently recommend endovenous thermal ablation using laser (EVLA) or radiofrequency as first line treatment for truncal Great Saphenous Vein (GSV) incompetence in preference to Ultrasound Guided Foam Sclerotherapy (UGFS) (1,2). This GSV-based recommendation has tended to be used for treating Small Saphenous Vein (SSV) incompetence. To date, no RCTs have directly compared UGFS and EVLA for SSV treatment. The French Society of Phlebology (SFP) decided to compare these two most utilised endovenous treatments in France in a controlled study called the FOam VErsus LAser in the SSv (FOVELASS) study, involving 13 investigators in 11 vascular medical centres.

Interventions

DRUGUltrasound-guided-foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) using Polidocanol sclerosant

Direct injection Foam sclerotherapy

EVLA using a 1470nm generator and 600-micron radial fibres (Biolitec® Biomedical Technology, Jena, Germany), under tumescent local anaesthesia (TLA)

Sponsors

Societe Francaise de Phlebologie
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Blinding of participants and investigators is not possible because of the obvious differences between the two treatments (a single mid-calf injection versus multiple injections for tumescent anaesthesia/laser precautions etc…). A blind third-party check was carried out, only at 3 years, and those assessors were completely independent of the study and blinded.

Intervention model description

multicentre-RCT (11 centres) comparing ultrasound-guided-foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and Endovenous Laser Ablation (EVLA) for treating small saphenous veins (SSV) insufficiency

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* symptomatic varicose veins (CEAP C2s-C6) * underlying isolated SSV incompetence (SSV reflux time\>0.5sec on duplex ultrasound (DUS)) * reflux involving at least 15 cm of proximal SSV * minimal SSV diameter of 4 mm at mid-calf (luminal diameter in standing position)

Exclusion criteria

* SSV treatment in the preceding 3 months * post-thrombotic disease * deep or superficial vein thrombosis of less than 3 months duration * coexistent ipsilateral GSV insufficiency * morbid obesity (BMI\>40) * presence of significant arterial disease (ABPI\<0.5)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absence of reflux in the treated SSV segment3Assessed at yearsclosed veins or patent veins with no reflux (\>0.5sec)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedure related complicationsAssessed through study completion, an average of 3 yearsAny related complications arising from the procedure
Periprocedural pain scoreup to four weeksassessed on a visual analogue score (zero = no pain, 100 = maximum pain)
Presence of visible varicesThrough study completion, average of 3 yearsReported recurrence of varicose veins
Treatment timeAssessed on day of treatmentTime (in minutes) spent in undertaking each treatment
Revised Venous Clinical Severity Score -rVCSSThrough study completion, average of 3 yearsValidated questionnaire scores
Quality of Life questionnaire (CIVIQ)Through study completion, average of 3 yearsValidated questionnaire scores
Venous symptoms questionnaireThrough study completion, average of 3 yearsValidated questionnaire scores

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026