Skip to content

Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Double- Masked and Placebo-Controlled Study of YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Dry Eye (ICECAP 1)

A Phase 2, Multi-center, Randomized, Double- Masked and Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Placebo in Subjects With Dry Eye (ICECAP 1)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05467293
Enrollment
257
Registered
2022-07-20
Start date
2022-06-27
Completion date
2023-03-06
Last updated
2024-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.

Detailed description

The clinical hypotheses for this study is that 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution twice daily (BID) and 1.0% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution BID are superior to YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle) for the primary endpoints of signs and symptoms of dry eye, as follows: * Sign: Total corneal fluorescein staining score of the study eye using the modified NEI grading scale, measured by mean change from baseline (Visit 2, Pre- Controlled Adverse Environment \[CAE®\]) to Visit 6 * Symptom: Ocular discomfort score of both eyes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ocular Discomfort Scale, measured by mean change from baseline (Visit 2, Pre-CAE®) to Visit 6

Interventions

DRUG0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution

Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution

DRUG1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution

Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution

DRUGYP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle)

Placebo YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle)

Sponsors

Yuyu Pharma, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Before the initiation of study run-in at Visit 1, each subject who provides written informed consent will be assigned a screening number. All screening numbers will be assigned in strict numerical sequence at a site and no numbers will skipped or omitted. Each subject who meets all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria at Visit 1 and Visit 2 will be assigned a randomization number at the end of Visit 2. The Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) will be used to assign all randomization numbers.

Intervention model description

multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical study. Subjects will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms at Visit 2 (Day 1): * 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: 1 drop BID in each eye (N = \ 80) * 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: 1 drop BID in each eye (N = \ 80) * YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle): 1 drop BID in each eye (N = \ 80)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

• Individuals eligible to participate in this study must meet all of the following criteria: 0. Be at least 18 years of age; 1. Provide written informed consent; 2. Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures; 3. Have a patient-reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1; 4. Have a history of use or desire to use eye drops for dry eye symptoms within 6 months of Visit 1; 5. Have a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better (Snellen equivalent score of 20/100 or better) in each eye at Visit 1; 6. Have a score of ≥ 2 for both eyes according to the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4- Symptom Questionnaire in at least one of the dry eye symptoms at Visits 1 and 2; 7. Have an unanesthetized Schirmer's Test score of ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes and ≥ 1 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye at Visits 1 and 2; 8. Have a corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥ 2 according to the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale for Grading of Fluorescein Staining in at least one region in one eye at Visits 1 and 2 and a central score ≥ 1 in the same eye; 9. Have a conjunctival redness score ≥ 1 according to the Ora Calibra® Conjunctival Redness for Dry Eye Scale in at least one eye at Visits 1 and 2 pre-CAE®; 10. Demonstrate in the same eye(s) a response to the CAE® at Visits 1 and 2 as defined by: * Having at least a ≥1 point increase in fluorescein staining in the inferior region in at least one eye following CAE® exposure; a. Reporting an Ocular Discomfort score ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE® exposure (if a subject has an Ocular Discomfort rating of 3 at time = 0 for an eye, s/he must report an Ocular Discomfort rating of 4 for two consecutive measurements for that eye). Note: a subject cannot have an Ocular Discomfort score of 4 at time = 0); 11. Have at least one eye, the same eye, satisfy all criteria for 8, 9, 10 and 11 above; 12. A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized \[bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy\] or post-menopausal \[12 months after last menses\]) and must use adequate birth control through the study period. For non-sexually active females, abstinence may be regarded as an adequate method of birth control.)

Exclusion criteria

• Individuals who meet any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Corneal Fluorescein StainingDay 85Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-20: Higher is Worse
Ocular Discomfort ScoreDay 85Visual Analogue Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluorescein Staining: Superior13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Fluorescein Staining: Central13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Fluorescein Staining: Temporal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Fluorescein Staining: Nasal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-24: Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Conjunctival Redness13 weeksOra Calibra Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test13 weeksscore on a scale of ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes and ≥ 1 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye. Schirmer's test can be interpreted as follows: 0 to 5 mm: extremely dry eyes; 5 to 10 mm: moderately dry eyes; 10 to 15 mm: possible dry eyes; Longer than 15 mm: normal tear function.
Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)13 weeks
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-513 weeksOcular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-913 weeksOcular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-1213 weeksOcular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total13 weeksOcular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Burning/Stinging13 weeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Foreign Body Sensation13 WeeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Blurred Vision13 WeeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Eye Dryness13 WeeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Photophobia13 WeeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Pain in Eyes13 WeeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary13 weeksSelf-Administrating with use of Daily Compliance Diary. Subject daily diaries were collected at Visits 1 through 6, and the subject's used and unused study drug ampules were collected at Visit 3 through 6. Dosing compliance was based on the used and unused ampule count. If the subject was less than 80% or more than 125% compliant with dosing based on the expected number of used ampules, then the subject was deemed noncompliant and a dosing deviation was recorded. Dosing compliance (% compliance) was assessed by calculating the number of actual doses received and comparing that to the number of expected doses as follows: Compliance (%) = Number of Actual Doses Received / Number of Expected Doses x 100% The number of expected doses that will be used for calculating compliance was calculated as: 2 x \[(Date of Last Dose - Date of First Dose) + 1\]
Drop Comfort - Positive Response13 weeksA drop comfort evaluation will be performed immediately upon administration of study drug and then at 1, 2, and 3 minutes following initial dosing using the Ora Calibra Drop Comfort Scale
Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR13 weeksVisual Acuity was assessed using an ETDRS chart
Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS13 weeksSlit lamp biomicroscopic observations will be graded as Normal or Abnormal
Adverse Event Query - TEAEs13 weeksEach subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs13 WeeksEach subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs13 WeeksEach subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation13 WeeksEach subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug13 WeeksEach subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported13 WeeksEach subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS13 weeksusing indirect ophthalmoscopy. The Investigator will make observations of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve.
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges13 weeksA single measurement is made
Itching13 weeksVisual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Fluorescein Staining: Inferior13 weeksModified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution
85
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution
86
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle): Placebo YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle)
86
Total257

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionYP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
NA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA ParticipantsNA Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
39 Participants35 Participants38 Participants112 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants51 Participants48 Participants145 Participants
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino
13 Participants9 Participants11 Participants33 Participants
Ethnicity
Not Hispanic or Latino
72 Participants77 Participants75 Participants224 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Black
3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Blue
8 Participants13 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Brown
59 Participants55 Participants54 Participants168 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Gray
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Green
7 Participants8 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Hazel
8 Participants8 Participants10 Participants26 Participants
Iris Color (OD)
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Black
3 Participants2 Participants2 Participants7 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Blue
8 Participants13 Participants11 Participants32 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Brown
59 Participants55 Participants54 Participants168 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Gray
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Green
7 Participants8 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Hazel
8 Participants8 Participants10 Participants26 Participants
Iris Color (OS)
Other
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
16 Participants17 Participants17 Participants50 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
23 Participants17 Participants14 Participants54 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
44 Participants50 Participants52 Participants146 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
85 participants86 participants86 participants257 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
72 Participants59 Participants61 Participants192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants27 Participants25 Participants65 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 860 / 850 / 86
other
Total, other adverse events
28 / 8634 / 8542 / 86
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 860 / 851 / 86

Outcome results

Primary

Ocular Discomfort Score

Visual Analogue Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: Day 85

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Discomfort Score52.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.77
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Discomfort Score54.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.17
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Ocular Discomfort Score53.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.4
Primary

Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-20: Higher is Worse

Time frame: Day 85

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionTotal Corneal Fluorescein Staining7.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.73
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionTotal Corneal Fluorescein Staining7.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.957
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining7.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
Secondary

Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs

Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs11 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs13 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs18 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs

Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs12 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs13 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs17 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported

Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - SEA Reported1 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - SEA Reported0 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported1 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Event Query - TEAEs

Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs21 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs24 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - TEAEs31 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation

Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation3 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation2 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation1 Participants
Secondary

Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug

Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugDefinitely related to study drug8 Participants
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugProbably related to study drug2 Participants
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugPossibly related to study drug1 Participants
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugNo TEAE Reported75 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugNo TEAE Reported77 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugDefinitely related to study drug5 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugPossibly related to study drug2 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionAdverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugProbably related to study drug1 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugNo TEAE Reported73 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugProbably related to study drug4 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugPossibly related to study drug4 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study DrugDefinitely related to study drug5 Participants
Secondary

Blurred Vision

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionBlurred Vision41.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.9
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionBlurred Vision45.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.89
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Blurred Vision41.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.62
Secondary

Burning/Stinging

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionBurning/Stinging34.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.56
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionBurning/Stinging37.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.33
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Burning/Stinging43.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.48
Secondary

Conjunctival Redness

Ora Calibra Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionConjunctival Redness1.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.619
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionConjunctival Redness1.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.655
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Conjunctival Redness1.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.639
Secondary

Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS

using indirect ophthalmoscopy. The Investigator will make observations of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve.

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionDilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionDilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
Secondary

Drop Comfort - Positive Response

A drop comfort evaluation will be performed immediately upon administration of study drug and then at 1, 2, and 3 minutes following initial dosing using the Ora Calibra Drop Comfort Scale

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionDrop Comfort - Positive Response89.5 percentage of comfort
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionDrop Comfort - Positive Response84.7 percentage of comfort
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Drop Comfort - Positive Response84.9 percentage of comfort
Secondary

Eye Dryness

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionEye Dryness61.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionEye Dryness65.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.51
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Eye Dryness60.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.42
Secondary

Fluorescein Staining: Central

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Central1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.535
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Central1.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.543
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Fluorescein Staining: Central1.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.545
Secondary

Fluorescein Staining: Inferior

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Inferior1.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.379
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Inferior1.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.471
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Fluorescein Staining: Inferior1.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.507
Secondary

Fluorescein Staining: Nasal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Nasal1.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.548
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Nasal1.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.655
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Fluorescein Staining: Nasal1.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.542
Secondary

Fluorescein Staining: Superior

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Superior1.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.516
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Superior1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.537
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Fluorescein Staining: Superior1.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.519
Secondary

Fluorescein Staining: Temporal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Temporal1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.501
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionFluorescein Staining: Temporal1.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Fluorescein Staining: Temporal1.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.444
Secondary

Foreign Body Sensation

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionForeign Body Sensation38.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.62
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionForeign Body Sensation40.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.63
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Foreign Body Sensation40.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.46
Secondary

Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges

A single measurement is made

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionIntraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges0 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionIntraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges0 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges0 Participants
Secondary

Itching

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionItching38.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.05
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionItching44.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.09
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Itching40.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-24: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum5.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.922
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum4.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.872
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum5.62 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.848
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal0.92 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.751
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal0.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.775
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal1.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.733
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal0.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.754
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.68
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal0.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.695
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Nasal1.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.862
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Nasal0.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.81
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal0.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.799
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal0.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.799
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal0.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal0.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.818
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.689
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal0.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal0.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.723
Secondary

Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal

Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Temporal0.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.747
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionLissamine Green Staining: Temporal0.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.802
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal0.93 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Secondary

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-12

Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-1255.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.538
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-1249.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.346
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-1255.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.114
Secondary

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-5

Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-537.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.804
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-537.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.555
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-537.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.485
Secondary

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-9

Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-939.29 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.653
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-940.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.58
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-935.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.152
Secondary

Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total

Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total42.49 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.426
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionOcular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total41.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.031
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total41.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.098
Secondary

Pain in Eyes

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionPain in Eyes30.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.26
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionPain in Eyes28.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.64
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Pain in Eyes33.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.1
Secondary

Photophobia

Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse

Time frame: 13 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionPhotophobia44.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.7
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionPhotophobia47.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.82
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Photophobia44.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.57
Secondary

Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS

Slit lamp biomicroscopic observations will be graded as Normal or Abnormal

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionSlit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionSlit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS0 Participants
Secondary

Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionTear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)2.598 secondsStandard Deviation 0.8443
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionTear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)2.540 secondsStandard Deviation 0.9201
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)2.441 secondsStandard Deviation 0.8812
Secondary

Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary

Self-Administrating with use of Daily Compliance Diary. Subject daily diaries were collected at Visits 1 through 6, and the subject's used and unused study drug ampules were collected at Visit 3 through 6. Dosing compliance was based on the used and unused ampule count. If the subject was less than 80% or more than 125% compliant with dosing based on the expected number of used ampules, then the subject was deemed noncompliant and a dosing deviation was recorded. Dosing compliance (% compliance) was assessed by calculating the number of actual doses received and comparing that to the number of expected doses as follows: Compliance (%) = Number of Actual Doses Received / Number of Expected Doses x 100% The number of expected doses that will be used for calculating compliance was calculated as: 2 x \[(Date of Last Dose - Date of First Dose) + 1\]

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionTreatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary114.90 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 134.816
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionTreatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary100.13 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 4.525
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary100.83 percentage of complianceStandard Deviation 8.48
Secondary

Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test

score on a scale of ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes and ≥ 1 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye. Schirmer's test can be interpreted as follows: 0 to 5 mm: extremely dry eyes; 5 to 10 mm: moderately dry eyes; 10 to 15 mm: possible dry eyes; Longer than 15 mm: normal tear function.

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionUnanesthetized Schirmer's Test5.2 mmStandard Deviation 2.82
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionUnanesthetized Schirmer's Test5.0 mmStandard Deviation 2.76
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test4.7 mmStandard Deviation 2.72
Secondary

Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR

Visual Acuity was assessed using an ETDRS chart

Time frame: 13 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionVisual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR0 Participants
0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic SolutionVisual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR0 Participants
YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle)Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026