Dry Eye
Conditions
Brief summary
The objective of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye.
Detailed description
The clinical hypotheses for this study is that 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution twice daily (BID) and 1.0% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution BID are superior to YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle) for the primary endpoints of signs and symptoms of dry eye, as follows: * Sign: Total corneal fluorescein staining score of the study eye using the modified NEI grading scale, measured by mean change from baseline (Visit 2, Pre- Controlled Adverse Environment \[CAE®\]) to Visit 6 * Symptom: Ocular discomfort score of both eyes using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Ocular Discomfort Scale, measured by mean change from baseline (Visit 2, Pre-CAE®) to Visit 6
Interventions
Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution
Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution
Placebo YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle)
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Before the initiation of study run-in at Visit 1, each subject who provides written informed consent will be assigned a screening number. All screening numbers will be assigned in strict numerical sequence at a site and no numbers will skipped or omitted. Each subject who meets all the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria at Visit 1 and Visit 2 will be assigned a randomization number at the end of Visit 2. The Interactive Web Response System (IWRS) will be used to assign all randomization numbers.
Intervention model description
multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical study. Subjects will be randomized to one of the following treatment arms at Visit 2 (Day 1): * 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: 1 drop BID in each eye (N = \ 80) * 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: 1 drop BID in each eye (N = \ 80) * YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle): 1 drop BID in each eye (N = \ 80)
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
• Individuals eligible to participate in this study must meet all of the following criteria: 0. Be at least 18 years of age; 1. Provide written informed consent; 2. Be willing and able to comply with all study procedures; 3. Have a patient-reported history of dry eye for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1; 4. Have a history of use or desire to use eye drops for dry eye symptoms within 6 months of Visit 1; 5. Have a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.7 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) or better (Snellen equivalent score of 20/100 or better) in each eye at Visit 1; 6. Have a score of ≥ 2 for both eyes according to the Ora Calibra® Ocular Discomfort & 4- Symptom Questionnaire in at least one of the dry eye symptoms at Visits 1 and 2; 7. Have an unanesthetized Schirmer's Test score of ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes and ≥ 1 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye at Visits 1 and 2; 8. Have a corneal fluorescein staining score of ≥ 2 according to the Ora Calibra® Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale for Grading of Fluorescein Staining in at least one region in one eye at Visits 1 and 2 and a central score ≥ 1 in the same eye; 9. Have a conjunctival redness score ≥ 1 according to the Ora Calibra® Conjunctival Redness for Dry Eye Scale in at least one eye at Visits 1 and 2 pre-CAE®; 10. Demonstrate in the same eye(s) a response to the CAE® at Visits 1 and 2 as defined by: * Having at least a ≥1 point increase in fluorescein staining in the inferior region in at least one eye following CAE® exposure; a. Reporting an Ocular Discomfort score ≥ 3 at 2 or more consecutive time points in at least one eye during CAE® exposure (if a subject has an Ocular Discomfort rating of 3 at time = 0 for an eye, s/he must report an Ocular Discomfort rating of 4 for two consecutive measurements for that eye). Note: a subject cannot have an Ocular Discomfort score of 4 at time = 0); 11. Have at least one eye, the same eye, satisfy all criteria for 8, 9, 10 and 11 above; 12. A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized \[bilateral tubal ligation, hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy\] or post-menopausal \[12 months after last menses\]) and must use adequate birth control through the study period. For non-sexually active females, abstinence may be regarded as an adequate method of birth control.)
Exclusion criteria
• Individuals who meet any of the following
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining | Day 85 | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-20: Higher is Worse |
| Ocular Discomfort Score | Day 85 | Visual Analogue Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fluorescein Staining: Superior | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse |
| Fluorescein Staining: Central | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse |
| Fluorescein Staining: Temporal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse |
| Fluorescein Staining: Nasal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-24: Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse |
| Conjunctival Redness | 13 weeks | Ora Calibra Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse |
| Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test | 13 weeks | score on a scale of ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes and ≥ 1 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye. Schirmer's test can be interpreted as follows: 0 to 5 mm: extremely dry eyes; 5 to 10 mm: moderately dry eyes; 10 to 15 mm: possible dry eyes; Longer than 15 mm: normal tear function. |
| Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) | 13 weeks | — |
| Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-5 | 13 weeks | Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse) |
| Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-9 | 13 weeks | Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse) |
| Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-12 | 13 weeks | Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse) |
| Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total | 13 weeks | Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse) |
| Burning/Stinging | 13 weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse |
| Foreign Body Sensation | 13 Weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Blurred Vision | 13 Weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Eye Dryness | 13 Weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Photophobia | 13 Weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Pain in Eyes | 13 Weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary | 13 weeks | Self-Administrating with use of Daily Compliance Diary. Subject daily diaries were collected at Visits 1 through 6, and the subject's used and unused study drug ampules were collected at Visit 3 through 6. Dosing compliance was based on the used and unused ampule count. If the subject was less than 80% or more than 125% compliant with dosing based on the expected number of used ampules, then the subject was deemed noncompliant and a dosing deviation was recorded. Dosing compliance (% compliance) was assessed by calculating the number of actual doses received and comparing that to the number of expected doses as follows: Compliance (%) = Number of Actual Doses Received / Number of Expected Doses x 100% The number of expected doses that will be used for calculating compliance was calculated as: 2 x \[(Date of Last Dose - Date of First Dose) + 1\] |
| Drop Comfort - Positive Response | 13 weeks | A drop comfort evaluation will be performed immediately upon administration of study drug and then at 1, 2, and 3 minutes following initial dosing using the Ora Calibra Drop Comfort Scale |
| Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR | 13 weeks | Visual Acuity was assessed using an ETDRS chart |
| Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 13 weeks | Slit lamp biomicroscopic observations will be graded as Normal or Abnormal |
| Adverse Event Query - TEAEs | 13 weeks | Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events |
| Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs | 13 Weeks | Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events |
| Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs | 13 Weeks | Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events |
| Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation | 13 Weeks | Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events |
| Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | 13 Weeks | Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events |
| Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported | 13 Weeks | Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events |
| Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 13 weeks | using indirect ophthalmoscopy. The Investigator will make observations of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve. |
| Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges | 13 weeks | A single measurement is made |
| Itching | 13 weeks | Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse |
| Fluorescein Staining: Inferior | 13 weeks | Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | 85 |
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution: Drug: YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | 86 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle): Placebo YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (vehicle) | 86 |
| Total | 257 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | NA Participants | NA Participants | NA Participants | NA Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 39 Participants | 35 Participants | 38 Participants | 112 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 46 Participants | 51 Participants | 48 Participants | 145 Participants |
| Ethnicity Hispanic or Latino | 13 Participants | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Ethnicity Not Hispanic or Latino | 72 Participants | 77 Participants | 75 Participants | 224 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Black | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Blue | 8 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Brown | 59 Participants | 55 Participants | 54 Participants | 168 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Gray | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Green | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Hazel | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Iris Color (OD) Other | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Black | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Blue | 8 Participants | 13 Participants | 11 Participants | 32 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Brown | 59 Participants | 55 Participants | 54 Participants | 168 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Gray | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Green | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 9 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Hazel | 8 Participants | 8 Participants | 10 Participants | 26 Participants |
| Iris Color (OS) Other | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian | 16 Participants | 17 Participants | 17 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Black or African American | 23 Participants | 17 Participants | 14 Participants | 54 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Other | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White | 44 Participants | 50 Participants | 52 Participants | 146 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 85 participants | 86 participants | 86 participants | 257 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 72 Participants | 59 Participants | 61 Participants | 192 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 13 Participants | 27 Participants | 25 Participants | 65 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 86 | 0 / 85 | 0 / 86 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 28 / 86 | 34 / 85 | 42 / 86 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 86 | 0 / 85 | 1 / 86 |
Outcome results
Ocular Discomfort Score
Visual Analogue Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: Day 85
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Discomfort Score | 52.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.77 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Discomfort Score | 54.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.17 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Ocular Discomfort Score | 53.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-20: Higher is Worse
Time frame: Day 85
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining | 7.35 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.73 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining | 7.25 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.957 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Total Corneal Fluorescein Staining | 7.12 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.85 |
Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs
Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs | 11 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs | 13 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - Non Ocular TEAEs | 18 Participants |
Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs
Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs | 12 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs | 13 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - Ocular TEAEs | 17 Participants |
Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported
Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported | 1 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported | 0 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - SEA Reported | 1 Participants |
Adverse Event Query - TEAEs
Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs | 21 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs | 24 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs | 31 Participants |
Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation
Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation | 3 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation | 2 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Causing Premature Treatment Discontinuation | 1 Participants |
Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug
Each subject will be queried regarding adverse events
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Definitely related to study drug | 8 Participants |
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Probably related to study drug | 2 Participants |
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Possibly related to study drug | 1 Participants |
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | No TEAE Reported | 75 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | No TEAE Reported | 77 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Definitely related to study drug | 5 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Possibly related to study drug | 2 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Probably related to study drug | 1 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | No TEAE Reported | 73 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Probably related to study drug | 4 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Possibly related to study drug | 4 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Adverse Event Query - TEAEs Suspected to be Related to Study Drug | Definitely related to study drug | 5 Participants |
Blurred Vision
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Blurred Vision | 41.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.9 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Blurred Vision | 45.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.89 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Blurred Vision | 41.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.62 |
Burning/Stinging
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Burning/Stinging | 34.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.56 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Burning/Stinging | 37.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.33 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Burning/Stinging | 43.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.48 |
Conjunctival Redness
Ora Calibra Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Conjunctival Redness | 1.87 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.619 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Conjunctival Redness | 1.87 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.655 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Conjunctival Redness | 1.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.639 |
Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS
using indirect ophthalmoscopy. The Investigator will make observations of the vitreous, retina, macula, choroid and optic nerve.
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 0 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 0 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Dilated Fundoscopy: Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 0 Participants |
Drop Comfort - Positive Response
A drop comfort evaluation will be performed immediately upon administration of study drug and then at 1, 2, and 3 minutes following initial dosing using the Ora Calibra Drop Comfort Scale
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Drop Comfort - Positive Response | 89.5 percentage of comfort |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Drop Comfort - Positive Response | 84.7 percentage of comfort |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Drop Comfort - Positive Response | 84.9 percentage of comfort |
Eye Dryness
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Eye Dryness | 61.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Eye Dryness | 65.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.51 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Eye Dryness | 60.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.42 |
Fluorescein Staining: Central
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Central | 1.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.535 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Central | 1.28 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.543 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Fluorescein Staining: Central | 1.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.545 |
Fluorescein Staining: Inferior
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Inferior | 1.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.379 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Inferior | 1.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.471 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Fluorescein Staining: Inferior | 1.73 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.507 |
Fluorescein Staining: Nasal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Nasal | 1.60 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.548 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Nasal | 1.57 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.655 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Fluorescein Staining: Nasal | 1.55 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.542 |
Fluorescein Staining: Superior
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Superior | 1.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.516 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Superior | 1.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.537 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Fluorescein Staining: Superior | 1.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.519 |
Fluorescein Staining: Temporal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Temporal | 1.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.501 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Fluorescein Staining: Temporal | 1.33 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Fluorescein Staining: Temporal | 1.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.444 |
Foreign Body Sensation
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Foreign Body Sensation | 38.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.62 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Foreign Body Sensation | 40.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.63 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Foreign Body Sensation | 40.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.46 |
Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges
A single measurement is made
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges | 0 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges | 0 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Intraocular Pressure (IOP) by Contact Tonometry by the Examiner: Unsafe and Abnormal Ranges | 0 Participants |
Itching
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Itching | 38.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.05 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Itching | 44.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.09 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Itching | 40.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-24: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum | 5.36 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.922 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum | 4.96 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.872 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Conjunctival Sum | 5.62 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.848 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal | 0.92 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.751 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal | 0.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.775 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Nasal | 1.11 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.733 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal | 0.83 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.754 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal | 0.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.68 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Inferior Temporal | 0.95 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.695 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal | 1.04 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.862 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal | 0.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.81 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Nasal | 0.99 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.799 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal | 0.94 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.799 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal | 0.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Nasal | 0.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.818 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal | 0.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.689 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal | 0.66 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Superior Temporal | 0.76 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.723 |
Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal
Modified National Eye Institute Scale; 0-4 Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal | 0.88 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.747 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal | 0.81 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.802 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Lissamine Green Staining: Temporal | 0.93 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-12
Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-12 | 55.86 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.538 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-12 | 49.26 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.346 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 10-12 | 55.53 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.114 |
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-5
Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-5 | 37.44 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.804 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-5 | 37.71 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.555 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 1-5 | 37.50 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.485 |
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-9
Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-9 | 39.29 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.653 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-9 | 40.34 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.58 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Subtotal 6-9 | 35.75 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.152 |
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total
Ocular Surface Disease Index Scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total | 42.49 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.426 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total | 41.46 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.031 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI): Total | 41.42 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.098 |
Pain in Eyes
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Pain in Eyes | 30.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.26 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Pain in Eyes | 28.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.64 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Pain in Eyes | 33.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.1 |
Photophobia
Visual Analog Scale; 0-100: Higher is Worse
Time frame: 13 Weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Photophobia | 44.9 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.7 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Photophobia | 47.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.82 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Photophobia | 44.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29.57 |
Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS
Slit lamp biomicroscopic observations will be graded as Normal or Abnormal
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 0 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 0 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Slit-lamp Evaluation Biomicroscopy - Subjects That Had a Shift From Normal/Abnormal NCS to Abnormal CS | 0 Participants |
Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT)
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) | 2.598 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.8443 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) | 2.540 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.9201 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Tear Film Break-up Time (TFBUT) | 2.441 seconds | Standard Deviation 0.8812 |
Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary
Self-Administrating with use of Daily Compliance Diary. Subject daily diaries were collected at Visits 1 through 6, and the subject's used and unused study drug ampules were collected at Visit 3 through 6. Dosing compliance was based on the used and unused ampule count. If the subject was less than 80% or more than 125% compliant with dosing based on the expected number of used ampules, then the subject was deemed noncompliant and a dosing deviation was recorded. Dosing compliance (% compliance) was assessed by calculating the number of actual doses received and comparing that to the number of expected doses as follows: Compliance (%) = Number of Actual Doses Received / Number of Expected Doses x 100% The number of expected doses that will be used for calculating compliance was calculated as: 2 x \[(Date of Last Dose - Date of First Dose) + 1\]
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary | 114.90 percentage of compliance | Standard Deviation 134.816 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary | 100.13 percentage of compliance | Standard Deviation 4.525 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Treatment Compliance Using a Daily Compliance Diary | 100.83 percentage of compliance | Standard Deviation 8.48 |
Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test
score on a scale of ≤ 10 mm/5 minutes and ≥ 1 mm/5 minutes in at least one eye. Schirmer's test can be interpreted as follows: 0 to 5 mm: extremely dry eyes; 5 to 10 mm: moderately dry eyes; 10 to 15 mm: possible dry eyes; Longer than 15 mm: normal tear function.
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test | 5.2 mm | Standard Deviation 2.82 |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test | 5.0 mm | Standard Deviation 2.76 |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Unanesthetized Schirmer's Test | 4.7 mm | Standard Deviation 2.72 |
Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR
Visual Acuity was assessed using an ETDRS chart
Time frame: 13 weeks
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| 1% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR | 0 Participants |
| 0.3% YP-P10 Ophthalmic Solution | Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR | 0 Participants |
| YP-P10 Placebo Ophthalmic Solution (Vehicle) | Visual Acuity - Subjects With Increase Greater Than 0.2 logMAR | 0 Participants |