Skip to content

Using Radiomics to Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy

Using Radiomics to Predict Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefit in Advanced Gastric Cancer: a Two-center Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05465512
Enrollment
193
Registered
2022-07-19
Start date
2022-01-04
Completion date
2022-07-10
Last updated
2022-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Cancer

Keywords

tumor regression grade, radiomics, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, advanced gastric cancer, chemotherapy benefit

Brief summary

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) is an important treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, tools that effectively predict the efficacy of NC before treatment are lacking. Computed tomography images before and after NC were used to construct a deep learning-based radiomics signature to predict the efficacy of NC, prognoses and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy benefit.

Detailed description

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC) is an important treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, tools that effectively predict the efficacy of NC before treatment are lacking. Methods: Computed tomography images before and after NC were used to construct a deep learning-based radiomics signature to predict the efficacy of NC, prognoses and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy benefit. Tumor regression grade (TRG) =0 or 1 was defined as a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GRNC), and TRG=2 or 3 was defined as a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (PRNC). 193 patients with AGC from January 2010 to December 2018 in two different China university hospitals were included in this study. The before neoadjuvant chemotherapy imaging scoring system (BNCISS), imaging change scoring system before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ICSS), which were constructed based on computed tomography images before after treatment.

Interventions

OTHERresponse to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Tumor regression grade (TRG) =0 or 1 was defined as a good response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GRNC), and TRG=2 or 3 was defined as a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (PRNC).

Sponsors

Fujian Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Prospective collection and a retrospective analysis of patients seen from January 2010 to December 2018 at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FMUUH) and the First Hospital of Lanzhou University (FHLU) who were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma and underwent radical resection

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with concurrent malignant disease, distant metastases, palliative resection, or gastric stump cancer were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AUC for ICSS2022-01-01 to 2022-07-31The predictive performance of imaging change scoring system before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ICSS)
AUC for BNCISS2022-01-01 to 2022-07-31The predictive performance of before neoadjuvant chemotherapy imaging scoring system (BNCISS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
overall survival2010-01-01 to 2022-07-313 year overall survival
disease free survival2010-01-01 to 2022-07-313 year disease free survival

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026