Complete Edentulism Due to Periodontal Disease (Disorder)
Conditions
Brief summary
In the first part, after a brief introduction, the advantages and disadvantages of immediate dentures are compared. There is a detailed discussion on assessment and treatment planning which includes history taking, examination of the soft and hard tissues, current prostheses, occlusion as well as discussion on investigations required and formulating a diagnosis. The first part ends with a summary of types of immediate dentures and denture designs.
Detailed description
An Immediate denture is a complete or partial removable prosthesis that is fitted immediately after extraction or modification of teeth. The prosthesis replaces the missing/modified teeth and where required, the adjacent hard and soft tissues. It is constructed prior to the extraction of teeth and is used immediately to provide function and aesthetics which are lost as a result of tooth removal and avoid the embarrassment patients may have with living without teeth, while waiting for the tissues to heal prior to definitive tooth replacement.1 (See image 1) Some clinicians take impressions on the day of the extractions and fit the dentures a few days later. These dentures are fraught with challenges as the alveolar ridge begins to resorb soon after. Therefore an immediate denture is only truly an immediate denture when fitted on the day of the extractions. The use of a removable prosthesis within the UK is currently around 19% of adults in the general population 2 and in spite of this decreasing trend, as patients retain their natural dentition into older age,2 there is still a need for prosthodontic replacement as teeth are lost as a result of caries, periodontal disease, tooth wear or trauma. 3,4,5 The provision of an immediate denture can be challenging and close co-operation between patient, technician, and clinician is required.
Interventions
DRUGCEO Pack
is a eugenol-free, surgical dressing and periodontal pack that has no burning sensation, no unpleasant taste or odor, and offers proven protection to surgical sites. This product promotes cleanliness and healing. Plastic and cohesive, ropes of any length or thickness can be formed. The smooth texture allows this product to adapt closely to the teeth and tissue in order to protect the wound. It sets with resilient, non-brittle hardness.
Sponsors
Badr University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Good physical and mental health * Willing to give informed consent * Normal maxilla-mandibular relationship Angle Class I * Adequate bone quality and quantity in terms of width and height in the anterior maxillary and mandibular ridges verified by preoperative cone beam CT * Adequate inter-arch space to accommodate maxillary and mandibular implant prostheses
Exclusion criteria
* Uncontrolled diabetes * Smoking habits * Radiotherapy * Clinical or radiographic signs of pathologic conditions, osteoporosis * Patients on corticosteroids * Bruxism
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Post extraction Assessment | 6 weeks | Post extraction Assessment of Wound Healing following Inflammatory Proliferative Remodeling (IPR) scale. The scale is divided into three subscales corresponding to the three phases of wound healing, and each is rated at the appropriate time point during follow-up,3 yielding three subscale scores and a total score. The outcome parameters of the subscales depend on the biological events that occur during that specific phase. At the end of follow up, the total score of the IPR Scale was calculated (0-16), where 0-4 indicated poor healing, 5-10 acceptable healing, and 11-16 excellent healing |
Countries
Egypt
Outcome results
None listed