Skip to content

TAD in Primary Breast Cancer With Initially ≥ 3 Suspicious Lymph Nodes

Prospective, Multicentric Registry Study Evaluating the False-negative Rate of Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD) in Primary Breast Cancer With Initially ≥ 3 Suspicious Lymph Nodes Under Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy (SenTa 2)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05462457
Acronym
SenTa2
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-07-18
Start date
2022-03-07
Completion date
2032-03-31
Last updated
2023-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Node-positive Breast Cancer

Keywords

Targeted axillary dissection, TAD, False-negative rate

Brief summary

Due to high pathological complete remission (pCR) rates in both breast and lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis, ypN0) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in many patients with initially clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer, the standard treatment of the axilla has changed from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), which is associated with high morbidity, to less invasive, surgical approaches. In several studies, targeted axillary dissection (TAD) has presented with false-negative rates (FNRs) less than 5%, however, in patients with high initial lymph node involvement (≥ 3 clinically suspicious lymph nodes) TAD has not been thoroughly investigated. The present prospective registry study aims to evaluate the FNR of TAD in patients with ≥ 3 initially suspicious lymph nodes and clinically node-negative status (ycN0) after NST in comparison to ALND.

Detailed description

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer achieved pCR rates of 50-70% following NST. In the multicenter prospective SenTa study (NCT03102307), the axillary pCR rate after the end of NST in 473 initially cN+ patients was 60.3%. Therefore, less invasive surgical techniques have been investigated to avoid the morbidity associated with ALND. One of these minimally invasive methods called TAD involves the combined intraoperative excision of the pre-NST marked most suspicious lymph node (target lymph node, TLN) and sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). In a pooled analysis of 13 studies including 521 patients who had undergone TAD, the FNR of TAD was 5.2%. The FNR of TAD in breast cancer patients with high initial lymph node (LN) involvement (≥ 3 clinically suspicious LNs) has so far hardly been investigated. In a very small cohort, a FNR of 0% was obtained for patients with 1-3 suspicious LNs (cN1, n = 10), 33% for patients with 4-9 suspicious LNs (cN2, n = 3) and 100% for patients with 10 or more suspicious LNs (cN3, n = 2). In addition, patients with high lymph node involvement are often excluded from some larger studies evaluating TAD or other axillary surgical approaches. In consequence, the FNR of TAD LNs in comparison to LNs obtained during ALND in the patient group with ≥ 3 clinically positive LNs needs to be evaluated in a larger cohort, since extensive initial LN involvement is associated with a higher probability that a false-negative result of TAD could cause one or more involved LNs to be left in the axilla, if only TAD and not ALND is performed.

Interventions

PROCEDURETargeted axilllary dissection (TAD) followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)

Intraoperative excision of TAD lymph nodes followed by ALND in the same surgical session or secondary surgical intervention

Sponsors

Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* signed informed consent form * female/male patient aged ≥ 18 years * clinical (c) tumor stage T1-4c, bilateral breast cancer and multifocal tumor allowed * invasive breast cancer confirmed by core biopsy * clinically node positive (cN+) (by means of axillary ultrasound or other imaging methods) with ≥ 3 clinically suspicious lymph nodes * biopsy-proven axillary lymph node involvement * marking (e.g. with a clip, magnetic seed, carbon suspension) of the clinically suspicious lymph node(s) before the start of NST * without distant metastases * indication for NST including chemotherapy * TAD + ALND planned * at least 7 lymph nodes (TAD + ALND) planned for histological analysis

Exclusion criteria

* cN0 or cN+ with ≤ 2 clinically suspicious lymph nodes * patients without indication for NST or NST \< 12 weeks * NST without chemotherapy * adjuvant/ neoadjuvant therapy already started prior to inclusion in the study * patients for whom only ALND is planned * ycN+ (by means of axillary ultrasound or other imaging methods) * recurrent breast cancer * larger surgery of the breast (starting from quadrant resection) or the axilla prior to the study * previous radiotherapy of the breast or axilla * inflammatory breast cancer * extramammary breast cancer * pregnant women * not able to undergo surgery * inability to understand the purpose of the clinical study or to comply with study conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
False-negative rate (FNR) of TAD in patients with ycN0 statusPostoperatively immediately after histopathological evaluation of LNsThe FNR of TAD is calculated as the number of patients with histologically negative TAD lymph nodes (LNs) who were found to have positive LNs in the ALND specimen, divided by the total number of patients with positive LNs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Localization of TLNsPreoperatively or during NSTSuccessful localization with e.g. wire, magnetic marker, or reflector clip of the marked TLNs
Detection rate of TADAt the time of surgerySuccessful intraoperative identification of at least one SLN and one TLN, including cases with TLN = SLN
Detection rate of target lymph node biopsy (TLNB)At the time of surgerySuccessful intraoperative identification of TLN(s)
Detection rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)At the time of surgerySuccessful intraoperative identification of SLN(s)
FNR of TLNBPostoperatively immediately after histopathological evaluation of LNsThe FNR of TLNB is calculated as the number of patients with histologically negative TLNs who were found to have positive SLNs and/or positive LNs in the ALND specimen, divided by the total number of patients with positive LNs.
Detection rate of preoperative ultrasoundPreoperativelyPreoperative detection rate (DR) of initially marked target lymph nodes (TLNs) on ultrasound images after the end of NST
FNR of preoperative ultrasoundPostoperatively immediately after histopathological evaluation of LNsFalse-negative is defined as preoperative ycN0 status on axillary ultrasound images and pathological ypN+ after surgery
Rate of local recurrence5 years after surgery, interim analysis: 2 years after surgeryProportion of patients with ipsilateral or contralateral recurrence in the breast and/or axilla occurring at any time after surgery.
Rate of distant recurrence5 years after surgery, interim analysis: 2 years after surgeryProportion of patients with distant recurrence occurring at any time after surgery.
Invasive disease-free-survival (iDFS)5 years after surgery, interim analysis: 2 years after surgeryiDFS is calculated as the time from surgery to the occurrence of either local recurrence, distant recurrence, second malignant disease (breast or different origin), or death from any cause.
Overall survival (OS)5 years after surgery, interim analysis: 2 years after surgeryOS is calculated as the time from surgery to death from any cause
FNR of SLNBPostoperatively immediately after histopathological evaluation of LNsThe FNR of SLNB is calculated as the number of patients with negative SLNs who were found to have positive TLNs and/or positive LNs in the ALND specimen, divided by the total number of patients with positive LNs.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactOliver Halfmann
O.Halfmann@kem-med.com+49201174
Backup ContactDorothea Schindowski
D.Schindowski@kem-med.com+49201174

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026