Skip to content

Diathermy vs Scalpel in Abdominal Incision in Women Undergoing CS

Diathermy Versus Scalpel in the Transverse Abdominal Incision in Primigravida Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Section

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05462418
Enrollment
300
Registered
2022-07-18
Start date
2022-07-15
Completion date
2023-02-15
Last updated
2022-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Incision, Surgical

Keywords

Diathermy, scalpel, cesarean section, obese

Brief summary

Cesarean section is surging worldwide. For an extended period of surgical practice, the scalpel has been well-known as a gold-standard tool for making surgical incisions. The diathermy, electrocautery, is a substitute.

Interventions

incisions completed using use the unipolar diathermy from Whiteline till we reach the parietal peritoneum (cutting the Whiteline then coagulation till reaching the peritoneum). The used diathermy frequency was 50-70 MHz.

PROCEDUREscalpel

patients had their incisions completed using the surgical scalpel till we reach the parietal peritoneum.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women with BMI 30- 40 Kg/m2. * Women pregnant with singletons and planned to have a repeat elective lower-segment CS at 38-39 weeks' gestation due to having had one previous CS. * Women pregnant with singletons and planned to deliver by lower-segment CS at 38-39 weeks' gestation for the first time (primi-section) due to obstetric indication.

Exclusion criteria

* Cases with coagulopathies eg. Hemophilia, von Willebrand disease * Cases on anti-coagulant therapy eg. Heparin, warfarin * Cases with chronic diseases expected to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, hypertension, liver diseases, chronic anemia, and renal impairment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
blood loss30 minassess and compare intraoperative blood loss between both studied groups. This was done using visualization technique detecting numbers of fully soaked pads used during the incision.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

Primary Contactwaleed M El-khayat, MD
waleed_elkhyat@yahoo.com01005135542

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026