Skip to content

Re-instrumentation vs Flap Surgery

Re-instrumentation vs Flap Surgery in Residual Pockets: a RCT on Clinical Efficacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05460988
Enrollment
46
Registered
2022-07-15
Start date
2022-08-11
Completion date
2024-07-11
Last updated
2025-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Periodontal Pocket, Periodontitis

Keywords

non-surgical periodontal therapy, re-instrumentation

Brief summary

There are no studies comparing reinstrumentation and flap surgery for the treatment of residual periodontal pockets. The aim of this RCT is to compare the re-instrumentation vs the flap surgery in terms of PD reduction, CAL gain, gingival recession, need of an additional surgery and pocket closure. Moreover, PROMs will be evaluated

Interventions

PROCEDURENon surgical re-instrumentation

The sites showing remaining pockets (PD\>4mm), in the sextants allocated to re-instrumentation group, will be treated with subgingival debridement. The subgingival debridement will be performed after the administration of local oral anaesthesia (Articaine 1:100000) using a periodontal tip on ultrasonic instrument (EMS) and Gracey's curettes.

PROCEDUREFlap surgery

All the sites showing a residual pocket in a sextant allocated to surgery group will receive flap surgery. After the administration of oral local anaesthesia (Articaine 1:100000) an intrasulcular flap will be raised. In order to preserve interdental tissue the flaps will be designed accordingly the principles of papillary preservation flap. Toot root will be carefully debrided using both ultrasonic instruments and Grecey's curettes. Bone recontouring and ostectomy/osteoplasty will be avoided. Single simple sutures will be used to close the flap (Vicryl 5-0).

Sponsors

University of Florence
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18aa * Patients with periodontal disease * Less than 20 cigarettes/day * No systemic antibiotic therapy in the last 3 months * At least one interdental site showing PD≥5mm after the non surgical periodontal initial therapy. Infrabony component of the defect ≤3mm at x-ray * Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score \<15% at baseline (re-evaluation) measured at six sites per tooth * No previous periodontal surgery at the experimental tooth

Exclusion criteria

* Connective tissue diseases * Diabetes * Pregnancy or lactating * Furcation involvement * Crowned tooth * Severe tooth mobility (class III) * Radiographical horizontal bone resorption exceeding the 50% of the root

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PD change3 months after the procedurechange in periodontal probing depth (in mm)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
CAL change3 months after the procedurechange in clinical attachment level (in mm)

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026