Skip to content

Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Based Adalimumab Therapy Optimization in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Proactive Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Based Adalimumab Therapy Optimization in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05460390
Acronym
TDM-RA
Enrollment
5
Registered
2022-07-15
Start date
2022-10-26
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2024-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), Optimal trough drug concentration, Adalimumab dose optimization, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3)

Brief summary

Current standard of care of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management includes a routine clinical assessment of disease activity to adjust therapy. For the most part, therapy adjustment for therapy non-response and/or suboptimal therapy response leads to therapy switch within the same class of therapy or to a different class of therapy. The lack of objective data to titrate dose of a given therapeutic agent for maximal possible efficacy makes it difficult for providers and payors to titrate dose as needed. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) provides objective data for a proactive and individualized therapy optimization based on serum drug levels and the presence or absence of anti-drug antibodies. Maintaining optimal trough drug concentration is a proven concept of therapeutics. With respect to adalimumab, this approach helps to maximize therapeutic efficacy and prevent anti-adalimumab antibody development. However, lack of drug and disease state specific published data creates a barrier for a wider adoption of TDM into clinical practice. The objective of this single site, open label, randomized, parallel group pilot study is to investigate whether proactive therapeutic drug monitoring based adalimumab dose optimization results in higher rate of achieving and/or maintaining therapeutic goal compared to standard of care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Interventions

Serum trough level of adalimumab and anti-adalimumab antibody will be obtained at time of enrollment and every 3 months until the end of the study. Adalimumab dose optimization goal will be to achieve trough drug level in the range of 5 -8 μg/mL.

Sponsors

American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis * Starting or already being treated with standard dose adalimumab, 40 mg subcutaneously (SQ) every two weeks * Good medication adherence rate defined as Proportion of Days Covered (PDC) 80% and above

Exclusion criteria

* Detectable anti-adalimumab antibodies * Overlapping immune mediated diseases * Steroid therapy for more than 2 months prior to study enrollment * Poor medication adherence rate (PDC \< 80%) * History of recurrent infection resulting in therapy pause * Pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
3 months change in proportion of patients with RA who achieve and maintain remission or low disease activitybaseline, 3 monthsRemission and low disease activity is defined as a Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) score of \<2.6 and 2.6 -3.2 respectively. A DAS-28 reduction by 0.6 represents a moderate improvement, while a reduction more than 1.2 represents a major improvement.
6 months change in proportion of patients with RA who achieve and maintain remission or low disease activitybaseline, 6 monthsRemission and low disease activity is defined as a Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) score of \<2.6 and 2.6 -3.2 respectively. A DAS-28 reduction by 0.6 represents a moderate improvement, while a reduction more than 1.2 represents a major improvement.
9 months change in proportion of patients with RA who achieve and maintain remission or low disease activitybaseline, 9 monthsRemission and low disease activity is defined as a Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) score of \<2.6 and 2.6 -3.2 respectively. A DAS-28 reduction by 0.6 represents a moderate improvement, while a reduction more than 1.2 represents a major improvement.
12 months change in proportion of patients with RA who achieve and maintain remission or low disease activitybaseline, 12 monthsRemission and low disease activity is defined as a Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis with CRP (DAS28-CRP) score of \<2.6 and 2.6 -3.2 respectively. A DAS-28 reduction by 0.6 represents a moderate improvement, while a reduction more than 1.2 represents a major improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of participants who achieved low or near remission disease severitybaseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 monthsThis will be assessed with the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) which is a composite disease activity index consisting of the 3 Patient Reported Outcomes, disability, pain, and patient global assessment of disease activity. Scores can range from 0 to 30 and low or near remission disease severity is defined as patients with RAPID3 disease severity score of 3.1-6 and ≤3 respectively.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026