Skip to content

Technology-Based Well-Being Process Program (WEBEPROP) for Children and Adolescents in Palliative Care

Intervention Protocol: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Technology-Based Well-Being Process Program (WEBEPROP) for Children and Adolescents in Palliative Care: A Randomized Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05457153
Enrollment
60
Registered
2022-07-13
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2022-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Childhood Cancer

Keywords

Palliative Care, Spiritualitiy, Spiritual Care, Cancer, Child

Brief summary

Objective: The research was planned to evaluate the effectiveness of the 8-week technology-based Well-Being Process program for children and adolescents in the palliative care period. Methods: This study was planned as a randomized controlled experimental study. The research will be carried out with children aged 12-20 years with a diagnosis of cancer, in the pediatric oncology and hematology clinics of two hospitals in Turkey. Data collection will consist of the children and adolescent's and parents' descriptive characteristic form Adolescent Spiritual Well-Being Scale, Beck Anxiety Scale, Pediatric Cancer Coping Scale and Technology-Based Spiritual Care Program Process Evaluation Forms. The program will be implemented for the intervention group. In the 8-week program; a) 4 web-based modules, b) 8 online individual interviews after each module (8 total interviews with each child) c) simultaneous mobile messages with the modules, and d) 24/7 counseling. Animation videos, breathing and progressive relaxation exercises, and imagination methods will be included in the modules. This research is based on the Watson Model of Human Care.

Detailed description

Hypothesis: H1: There is a significant difference between the spiritual well being score averages of children and adolescents who have been administered and have not been administered WEBEPROP. H2: There is a significant difference between the anxiety scores of children and adolescents who have been administered and have not been administered WEBEPROP. H3: There is a significant difference between the coping scores of children and adolescents who have been administered and have not been administered WEBEPROP.

Interventions

OTHERWell-Being Process Program (WEBEPROP)

Technology-Based Well-Being Process Program (WEBEPROP)

Sponsors

Gazi University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Between the ages of 10-20, * Child and adolescent with palliative care needs * At least 3 months before diagnosis * Child and adoescent have completed the induction phase of treatment, * İntermediate-high-risk group defined under a treatment protocol, * Child and aolescent can utilizecomputer, mobile phone and tablet * Children and adolescents who agreed to participate in the survey and their parent.

Exclusion criteria

* Newly diagnosed with physical and mental disabilities, * Child and adolescent with severe anxiety according to the anxiety score scale, * Out of diagnosis in the last 6 months (loss of parents, natural disaster, etc.) are children and adolescents who experience high levels of stress and have an important psychiatric diagnosis that affects their mental health.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pediatric Cancer Coping Scale (PCCS)Coping scores will be checked at the beginning of the program baselineThe scale developed by Wu et al. for children with cancer between the ages of 7 and 18 years. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was conducted by Sengul and Törüner (2019). There are a total of 33 items in the scale. There are three sub-dimensions of cognitive coping, problem-oriented coping and defensive coping. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 99 points is obtained from the scale. High scores obtained from the scale indicate high levels of coping strategies. A low score means that coping skills are insufficient.In the original study of the scale, the Cronbach Alpha value was determined as 0.91
The Scale of Spiritual Well-Being in Adolescents (SSWA)The Scale of Spiritual Well-Beingscores will be checked at the beginning of the program baselineThe scale developed by Törüner et al. assesses the spiritual well-being of adolescents aged 14-18 years. The scale, which is thought to help health professionals provide holistic care for adolescents, consists of a total of 34 items. Adolescents receive a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 136 points from the scale. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the spiritual well-being scores of adolescents increase. As the score obtained from the scale decreases, the spiritual well-being of the adolescents decreases. The Cronbach alpha value of the scale is 90.
Beck Anxiety ScaleAnxiety scores will be checked at the beginning of the program baselıneThe scale, which was developed by Beck et al. in 1988 to determine the level of anxiety (anxiety) of adult and adolescent individuals, consists of 21 items of the four-likert type. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Ulusoy et al. in 1993. Individuals are expected to be marked by their intensity of experiencing substances that are composed of symptoms and emotions commonly associated with anxiety. The sum of the scores was evaluated as 0-7: Minimal level of anxiety, 8-15: Mild level of anxiety, 16-25: Moderate level of anxiety, 26-63: Severe level of anxiety

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Beck Anxiety ScaleAnxiety scores will be checked completedthrough study completion, an average of 1 weekThe scale, which was developed by Beck et al. in 1988 to determine the level of anxiety (anxiety) of adult and adolescent individuals, consists of 21 items of the four-likert type. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Ulusoy et al. in 1993. Individuals are expected to be marked by their intensity of experiencing substances that are composed of symptoms and emotions commonly associated with anxiety. The sum of the scores was evaluated as 0-7: Minimal level of anxiety, 8-15: Mild level of anxiety, 16-25: Moderate level of anxiety, 26-63: Severe level of anxiety
The Scale of Spiritual Well-Being in Adolescents (SSWA)The Scale of Spiritual Well-Being scores will be checked completedthrough study completion, an average of 1 weekThe scale developed by Törüner et al. assesses the spiritual well-being of adolescents aged 14-18 years. The scale, which is thought to help health professionals provide holistic care for adolescents, consists of a total of 34 items. Adolescents receive a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 136 points from the scale. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the spiritual well-being scores of adolescents increase. As the score obtained from the scale decreases, the spiritual well-being of the adolescents decreases. The Cronbach alpha value of the scale is 90.
Pediatric Cancer Coping Scale (PCCS)Coping scores will be checked completed through study completion, an average of 1 weekThe scale developed by Wu et al. for children with cancer between the ages of 7 and 18 years. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was conducted by Sengul and Törüner (2019). There are a total of 33 items in the scale. There are three sub-dimensions of cognitive coping, problem-oriented coping and defensive coping. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 99 points is obtained from the scale. High scores obtained from the scale indicate high levels of coping strategies. A low score means that coping skills are insufficient. In the original study of the scale, the Cronbach Alpha value was determined as 0.91

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Scale of Spiritual Well-Being in Adolescents (SSWA)The Scale of Spiritual Well-Beingscores will be checked completed, through study completion, one monthThe scale developed by Törüner et al. assesses the spiritual well-being of adolescents aged 14-18 years. The scale, which is thought to help health professionals provide holistic care for adolescents, consists of a total of 34 items. Adolescents receive a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 136 points from the scale. As the score obtained from the scale increases, the spiritual well-being scores of adolescents increase. As the score obtained from the scale decreases, the spiritual well-being of the adolescents decreases. The Cronbach alpha value of the scale is 90.
Pediatric Cancer Coping Scale (PCCS)Coping scores will be checked completed, through study completion, one monthThe scale developed by Wu et al. for children with cancer between the ages of 7 and 18 years. The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale was conducted by Sengul and Törüner (2019). There are a total of 33 items in the scale. There are three sub-dimensions of cognitive coping, problem-oriented coping and defensive coping. A minimum of 0 and a maximum of 99 points is obtained from the scale. High scores obtained from the scale indicate high levels of coping strategies. A low score means that coping skills are insufficient. In the original study of the scale, the Cronbach Alpha value was determined as 0.91
Beck Anxiety ScaleAnxiety scores will be checked completed, through study completion, one monthThe scale, which was developed by Beck et al. in 1988 to determine the level of anxiety (anxiety) of adult and adolescent individuals, consists of 21 items of the four-likert type. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Ulusoy et al. in 1993. Individuals are expected to be marked by their intensity of experiencing substances that are composed of symptoms and emotions commonly associated with anxiety. The sum of the scores was evaluated as 0-7: Minimal level of anxiety, 8-15: Mild level of anxiety, 16-25: Moderate level of anxiety, 26-63: Severe level of anxiety

Contacts

Primary ContactSümeyye YILDIZ, PhD Student
sumeyye.yildiz1@gazi.edu.tr0534 682 37 94
Backup ContactEbru KILIÇARSLAN TORUNER,, PhD, RN
ebrutoruner@gazi.edu.tr

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026