Actinic Keratoses, Photodamaged Skin
Conditions
Brief summary
This blinded controlled 2-year study on 120 patients with 2 or more actinic keratoses, compare the efficacy and tolerability of pulsed dye-laser- mediated photodynamic therapy compared to conventional photodynamic therapy and fractional-laser assisted daylight photodynamic therapy compared to daylight photodynamic therapy.
Detailed description
Actinic keratoses are premalign skin lesions with increasing prevalence, causing a rising burden on the health care system. In this blinded controlled study we assess the efficacy of pulsed dye-laser- mediated photodynamic therapy compared to conventional photodynamic therapy and fractional-laser assisted daylight photodynamic therapy to daylight photodynamic therapy. It is a prospective, randomized and blinded split-head comparative study during the years 2016- 2024. 120 patients are recruited based on referral or from patients attending the clinic, with 2 or more actinic keratoses on the head, 60 to the pulsed dye-laser study and 60 to the fractional laser study. Follow-up appointments are 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post treatment. Patient reported maximal pain during treatment is documented.
Interventions
Comparance of pulsed-dye laser-mediated and conventional photodynamic therapy in a split-head design
Comparance of fractional CO2-laser-mediated or plain daylight photodynamic therapy in a split-head design
Metvix-cream was used for photodynamic therapy in all experimental arms
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
half-side comparative randomized controlled study
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* at least 2 AKs located on both sides of the head (either the scalp, forehead, temples, or cheeks)
Exclusion criteria
* pigmented AKs, in situ-carcinomas, skin cancers, psoriasis or eczema on the treatment area
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient complete (%, P) or partial clearance (%, P) | 2 year | All actinic keratoses on the particular treatment area cleared, or 75% of lesions on treatment area cleared |
| Lesion-specific clearance (%, P) | 2 year | Proportion of lesions that completely healed, partially healed or not healed in the particular treatment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Patient reported pain | 1 day | Maximal pain during treatment on the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) |