Skip to content

A Study to Investigate Tolerability and Efficacy of Asciminib (Oral) Versus Nilotinib (Oral) in Adult Participants (≥18 Years of Age) With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (Ph+ CML-CP)

A Phase IIIb, Multi-center, Open-label, Randomized Study of Tolerability and Efficacy of Oral Asciminib Versus Nilotinib in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase.

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05456191
Acronym
ASC4START
Enrollment
568
Registered
2022-07-13
Start date
2022-11-21
Completion date
2031-07-07
Last updated
2026-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

Keywords

Asciminib, ABL001, Abelson proto-oncogene, ABL, newly diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, CML, Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Chronic Myelocytic Leukemia, Chronic Granulocytic Leukemia, CGL, cancer of the white blood cells, clonal bone marrow stem cell disorder proliferation of mature granulocytes, Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders, Philadelphia chromosome, Nilotinib, Leukemia, Phase 3, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, TKI, Treatment Free Remission, TFR, Treatment Re-initiation, TRI

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the tolerability of oral asciminib (80 mg QD) in comparison with that of the second generation (2G) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) nilotinib (300 mg BID), in adult patients with newly diagnosed Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (Ph+ CML-CP).

Detailed description

The study is designed to compare the tolerability of asciminib with nilotinib for the treatment of newly diagnosed, previously untreated patients with Ph+ CML-CP and has 3 phases: Treatment Phase, Optional Treatment-Free Remission (TFR) Phase, and Treatment Re-initiation (TRI) Phase. Participants were randomized in the study in a 1:1 ratio to asciminib or nilotinib. No crossover of study treatment across arms were allowed. Randomization was stratified based on European Treatment Outcome Study (EUTOS) long-term survival (ELTS) score (low versus intermediate versus high) to help achieve a balance between the treatment arms. An interim analysis was planned in the protocol when 46 discontinuations due to AE occurred. The purpose of the interim analysis was to allow an early assessment of the tolerability of asciminib and the goal was to continue to primary analysis regardless of the outcome of the interim analysis. Therefore, following the interim analysis, the primary analysis was performed when approximately 65 discontinuations of either study treatment due to Adverse Event (AE) occurred. Eligible participants on both arms may choose to participate in an optional 2-year Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Phase. Participants with loss of Major Molecular Response (MMR) during TFR Phase will enter the Treatment Re-initiation (TRI) Phase. Additionally, treatment re-initiation in the TRI Phase may be based on investigator or participant decision.

Interventions

DRUGAsciminib

Asciminib 80 mg QD administered under fasting conditions.

DRUGNilotinib

Nilotinib 300 mg twice a day (BID) was administered under fasting conditions.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study. * Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age. * Patients with CML-CP within 3 months of diagnosis. * Diagnosis of CML-CP (European Leukemia Network \[ELN\] 2020 criteria) with cytogenetic confirmation of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome. A cryptic Ph chromosome should be confirmed by metaphase Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) • Documented chronic phase CML will meet all the below criteria (Baccarani et al 2013): \~ \< 15% blasts in peripheral blood and bone marrow, \~ \< 30% blasts plus promyelocytes in peripheral blood and bone marrow, \~\< 20% basophils in the peripheral blood, * Platelet (PLT) count ≥ 100 x 109/L (≥ 100,000/mm3), * No evidence of extramedullary leukemic involvement, with the exception of hepatosplenomegaly. * Evidence of typical BCR::ABL1 transcript \[e14a2 and/or e13a2\] which is amenable to standardized RQ-PCR quantification by the central laboratory assessment. However, if a local qualitative assay, validated according to local regulation, from an accredited local laboratory has confirmed evidence of typical BCR::ABL1 transcript \[e14a2 and/or e13a2\], these results can be used for eligibility if the central Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RQ-PCR) results arrived are not available at the time of randomization. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. * Adequate end organ function as defined by: • Total bilirubin (TBL) \< 3 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN); patients with Gilbert's syndrome may only be included if TBL ≤ 3.0 x ULN or direct bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, * Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) ≥ 30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) as calculated using Cockcroft-Gault formula, Serum lipase ≤ 1.5 x ULN. For serum lipase \> ULN - ≤ 1.5 x ULN, value must be considered not clinically significant and not associated with risk factors for acute pancreatitis. * Patients must have the following laboratory values within normal limits or corrected to within normal limits with supplements prior to randomization: * Potassium (potassium increase of up to 6.0 mmol/L is acceptable if associated with CrCl\* ≥ 90 mL/min)\*\*, * Total calcium (corrected for serum albumin); (calcium increase of up to 12.5 mg/dl or 3.1 mmol/L is acceptable if associated with CrCl\* ≥ 90 mL/min), * Magnesium (magnesium increase of up to 3.0 mg/dL or 1.23 mmol/L if associated with CrCl\* ≥ 90 mL/min), * For patients with mild to moderate renal impairment (CrCl\* ≥ 30 mL/min and \<90 mL/min) - potassium, total calcium (corrected for serum albumin) and magnesium should be within normal limits or corrected to within normal limits with supplements prior to randomization. * CrCl as calculated using Cockcroft-Gault formula. * pseudohyperkaliemia in case of thrombocytosis is not an exclusion criterion. Inclusion Criteria for optional Treatment Free Remission (TFR) Phase: * Willingness and ability to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plans, laboratory tests and other study procedures * A minimum of 3 years (156 weeks) of treatment on study, up-to maximum of 5 years (260 weeks) of treatment. * Sustained MR4.5 (BCR:ABL1 ≤0.0032% IS) for at least 1 year (≥52 weeks) immediately prior to entry into the TFR Phase, defined as 5 consecutive (every 12 weeks) central laboratory RQ-PCR assessments at MR4.5 or below for the course of at least a year. Entry into TFR Phase should be at an unscheduled visit or next scheduled visit no later than 12 Weeks from the last RQ-PCR assessment date at MR4.5 or lower. * Separate signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the TFR Phase. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Previous treatment of CML with any other anticancer agents including chemotherapy and/or biologic agents or prior stem cell transplant, with the exception of hydroxyurea and/or anagrelide. * Known cytopathologically confirmed central nervous system (CNS) infiltration (in absence of suspicion of CNS involvement, lumbar puncture not required). * Impaired cardiac function or cardiac repolarization abnormality including but not limited to any one of the following: • History of myocardial infarction (MI), angina pectoris, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) within 6 months prior to starting study treatment. • Clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias (e.g., ventricular tachycardia), complete left bundle branch block, high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block (e.g., bifascicular block, Mobitz type II and third degree AV block). * QT interval corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) ≥ 450 ms on the average of three serial baseline ECG (using the QTcF formula). If QTcF ≥ 450 ms and electrolytes are not within normal ranges, electrolytes should be corrected and then the patient re-screened for QTcF. * Long QT syndrome, family history of idiopathic sudden death or congenital long QT syndrome, or any of the following: * Risk factors for Torsades de Pointes (TdP) including uncorrected hypokalemia or hypomagnesemia, history of cardiac failure, or history of clinically significant/symptomatic bradycardia. * Concomitant medication(s) with a "Known risk of Torsades de Pointes" per crediblemeds.org that cannot be discontinued or replaced 7 days prior to starting study treatment by safe alternative medication. * Inability to determine the QTcF interval. * Severe and/or uncontrolled concurrent medical disease that in the opinion of the Investigator could cause unacceptable safety risks or compromise compliance with the protocol (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, active or uncontrolled infection; uncontrolled arterial or pulmonary hypertension, uncontrolled clinically significant hyperlipidemia). * History of significant congenital or acquired bleeding disorder unrelated to cancer. * Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to study entry or patients who have not recovered from prior surgery. * History of other active malignancy within 3 years prior to study entry with the exception of previous or concomitant basal cell skin cancer and previous carcinoma in situ treated curatively. * History of acute pancreatitis within 1 year prior to randomization or medical history of chronic pancreatitis. * History of chronic liver disease leading to severe hepatic impairment, or ongoing acute liver disease. * Known history of chronic Hepatitis B (HBV), or chronic Hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Testing for Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag) and Hepatitis B core antibody (HBc Ab/anti HBc) will be performed at screening. If anti-HBc is positive, HBV-DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) evaluation will be carried out at screening. A patient having positive HBV-DNA will not be enrolled in the study. Also, a patient with positive HBsAg will not be enrolled in the study. HCV Ab testing will also be performed at screening. For details on the criteria see Appendix 10.4 * History of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) unless well-controlled on a stable dose of anti-retroviral therapy at the time of screening. * Impairment of gastrointestinal (GI) function or GI disease that may significantly alter the absorption of study treatment (e.g., ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome, small bowel resection, or gastric bypass surgery). * Participation in a prior investigational study within 30 days prior to randomization or within 5 half-lives of the investigational product, whichever is longer. * Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women * Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception while taking study treatment and for a period of time after stopping study medication. For asciminib, this period of time is 3 days after last dose; if local regulations or locally approved prescribing information differ from the protocol required duration of contraception, the longer duration must be followed and the same requirements will be described in the Informed Consent Form (ICF). Participants taking nilotinib should be willing to follow contraception requirements in the locally-applicable prescribing information for nilotinib. Highly effective contraception methods include: * Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception. * Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy) or total hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy, at least six weeks before taking study treatment. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment. * Bilateral tubal occlusion, Bilateral tubal ligation (at least six weeks before taking study treatment). * Male partner's sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female participants on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that participant * Use of combined, estrogen and progesterone hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, intravaginal or transdermal. Progesterone only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation: oral, injected or implanted, or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS). In case of use of oral contraception women should have been stable on the same pill for a minimum of 3 months before taking study treatment. Women are considered post-menopausal if they have had 12 months of natural (spontaneous) amenorrhea with an appropriate clinical profile (e.g., age appropriate history of vasomotor symptoms). Women are considered not of child bearing potential if they are post-menopausal or have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy (with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or bilateral salpingectomy at least six weeks prior to enrollment on the study. In the case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment is she considered to be not of child bearing potential. Sexually active males taking study treatment do not require contraception. - Known hypersensitivity to the study treatment. Note: The Investigator has the discretion to include/exclude a patient in the study, who will be found to have symptoms representative of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) or tested positive for COVID-19 during the screening phase. Such patients should be managed as per the country specific guidelines related to COVID-19. For patients who test positive for COVID-19, re-testing is recommended before initiating study treatment.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment Due to Adverse Event (TTDAE) (From Primary Analysis)From date of first dose to date of treatment discontinuation due to AE, assessed after 67 events had occurred, about 2.5 years since first patient first visit (FPFV),TTDAE is defined as the interval from the date of first study treatment administration to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to an adverse event (AE). The comparison between the asciminib and nilotinib treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, in which discontinuations due to AE are considered the event of interest and discontinuations for reasons other than AE are treated as competing risks. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to AE within the specified timeframe is presented in the results table. The formal comparison between treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, and the corresponding hazard ratio, confidence interval, and p-value are provided in the Statistical Analysis section. The TTDAE endpoint is event-driven by counting how many participants have experienced treatment discontinuations due to AE.
Time to Discontinuation of Study Treatment Due to Adverse Event (TTDAE) (From Interim Analysis)From date of first dose to date of treatment discontinuation due to AE, assessed after 50 events had occurred, about 2 years since first patient first visit (FPFV).TTDAE is defined as the interval from the date of first study treatment administration to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to an adverse event (AE). The comparison between the asciminib and nilotinib treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, in which discontinuations due to AE are considered the event of interest and discontinuations for reasons other than AE are treated as competing risks. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to AE within the specified timeframe is presented in the results table. The formal comparison between treatment arms is performed using a cause-specific hazard model, and the corresponding hazard ratio, confidence interval, and p-value are provided in the Statistical Analysis section. The TTDAE endpoint is event-driven by counting how many participants have experienced treatment discontinuations due to AE.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) at Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsMMR will be assessed using fusion gene of the BCR and ABL genes (BCR-ABL) transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of participants with MMR at each time point will be assessed.
Percentage of Participants With Major Molecular Response (MMR) by Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsMMR will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (MMR) at or before the specified visit will be calculated.
Percentage of Participants With MR4.0 at Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsMR4.0 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of participants with MR4.0 at each time point will be assessed.
Percentage of Participants With MR4.0 by Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsMR4.0 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (MR4.0) at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Percentage of Participants With MR4.5 at Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsMR4.5 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of participants with MR4.5 at each time point will be assessed.
Percentage of Participants With MR4.5 by Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsMR4.5 will be assessed using BCR-ABL transcript levels measured by realtime quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (MR4.5) at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematological Response (CHR) at Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsHematologic response will be assessed by complete blood count and physical examination at each visit. The percentage of participants with CHR at each time point will be assessed.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Hematological Response (CHR) by Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsHematologic response will be assessed by complete blood count and physical examination at each visit. The percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved the endpoint (CHR) at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Percentage of Participants With BCR::ABL1 Ratio ≤1% at Scheduled Data Collection Time Pointsapproximately 7.5 yearsThe percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved BCR::ABL1 ratio ≤1% at the specified visit will be calculated
Percentage of Participants With BCR::ABL1 Ratio ≤1% by Scheduled Data Collection Timepointsapproximately 7.5 yearsThe percentage of participants who meet the criteria for having achieved BCR::ABL1 ratio ≤1% at or before the specified visit will be calculated
Duration of MMRapproximately 7.5 yearsDuration of MMR is defined as the time between the date of the first documented achievement MMR and the earliest date of loss of MMR, treatment failure, progression to AP/BC, or CML-related death.
Duration of MR4.0approximately 7.5 yearsDuration of MR4.0 is defined as the time between the date of the first documented achievement MR4 and the earliest date of loss of MR4, treatment failure, progression to AP/BC, or CML-related death
Duration of MR4.5approximately 7.5 yearsDuration of MR4.5 is defined as the time between the date of the first documented achievement MR4.5 and the earliest date of loss of MR4.5, treatment failure, progression to AP/BC, or CML-related death.
Time to First MMRapproximately 7.5 yearsTime to first MMR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented occurrence of MMR.
Time to First MR4.0approximately 7.5 yearsTime to first MR4.0 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented occurrence of MR4.
Time to First MR4.5approximately 7.5 yearsTime to first MR4.5 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented occurrence of MR4.5.
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF).approximately 7.5 yearsTTF is defined as the time from date of randomization to the first/earliest documented date of any of the following events: * Treatment failure per European leukemia network (ELN) criteria, * Confirmed loss of MMR (in 2 consecutive tests) at any time while on study treatment, * Discontinuation from study treatment due to any reason
Event Free Survival (EFS)approximately 7.5 yearsEFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the earliest occurrence of treatment failure, confirmed lost of MMR, discontinuation due to AE, progression to AP/BC, and death from any cause.
Progression Free Survival (PFS).approximately 7.5 yearsPFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the earliest occurrence of progression to AP/BC or death from any cause.
Overall Survival (OS).approximately 7.5 yearsOS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.
Change From Baseline in Overall Scores and Individual Scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)approximately 7.5 yearsChange from baseline in Overall Scores and individual domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items and is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures based on the participant's experience over the past week. These include five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), six single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial impact) and a global health status/QoL scale.
Change From Baseline in Overall Scores and Individual Scales of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer CML Module (EORTC QLQ-CML24)approximately 7.5 yearsChange from baseline in Overall Scores and individual domains of the EORTC QLQ-CML24. The EORTC QLQ-CML24 assesses specific concepts relevant to the experience of patients with CML. The QLQ-CML24 has 24 items which assess symptom burden, impact on daily life and on worry/mood, body image problems, and satisfaction with care and with social life based on the participant's experience over the past week.
Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD) Due to Selected Reasonsapproximately 7.5 yearsTTD is the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to lack of efficacy, treatment failure, disease progression, suboptimal response or death

Countries

Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Jordan, Malaysia, Netherlands, Oman, Romania, Singapore, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORNovartis Pharmaceuticals

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Participant flow

Recruitment details

568 participants with Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) were enrolled into this study from 120 sites in 24 countries.

Pre-assignment details

A similar percentage of participants on either arm had additional chromosomal abnormalities identified from the karyotype available at screening and a majority of participants did not have BCR::ABL1 gene mutations detected at baseline.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Continuous48.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.88
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
22 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multiple
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
8 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
227 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
335 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 2841 / 2823 / 566
other
Total, other adverse events
213 / 284235 / 282448 / 566
serious
Total, serious adverse events
47 / 28442 / 28289 / 566

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 27, 2026