Skip to content

Effectiveness of the Combination of Water Aerobics and Metacognitive Training

Efficacy of the Combination of Water Aerobics and Metacognitive Training (MCT) on Psychological and Physical Health Variables and Their Relationship With SP1 and SP4 Biomarkers in People With Psychosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05455593
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-07-13
Start date
2021-08-02
Completion date
2026-06-30
Last updated
2024-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychosis

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of a combined intervention of water aerobics and Metacognitive Training (MCT), compared to each intervention separately, in people with psychosis. One purpose is to analyze the improvement of clinical, cognitive, metacognitive and psychosocial variables, motor coordination and physical health condition. Another purpose is to study the changes in SP1 and SP4 biomarker transcription levels as a function of the intervention received. The hypothesis is that the combined intervention will enhance the benefits of each intervention separately, specifically in symptoms, cognition, metacognition and psychosocial variables.

Interventions

Patients in this arm will participate in both in water aerobics and MCT sessions, once a week for each intervention.

BEHAVIORALWater aerobics

1-hour session of water aerobics per week, for 3 months. A specialized trainer will carry out water aerobics sessions and will focus on motor coordination, strength and cardiovascular workout.

1-hour session of MCT per week, for 3 months. A trained psychologist will carry out the MCT sessions. MCT addresses the most common cognitive biases in psychosis. Each session will focus on one topic, such as attributional style, jumping to conclusions, theory of mind, emotion recognition, memory or empathy.

Sponsors

Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu
CollaboratorOTHER
Solidaritat Sant Joan de Déu
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fluidra
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome assessor will be blind to the intervention recieved by the participants

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of one of the following diagnoses according to DSM-V criteria: schizophrenia, unspecific psychotic disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder. * Psychopatological stability * 18 to 55 years old * Interested in participating in both water aerobics and MCT groups

Exclusion criteria

* Head injury or intellectual disabillity (premorbid IQ \<=70) * Present scores on the PANSS \>=5 in hostility, lack of cooperation or suspiciousness, to guarantee a good relationship in the group * Patients with substance dependence disorder * Problems related to water activities (phobia, severe mobility problems...)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline BCIS Beck Cognitive Insight Scale at 3 months (Beck et al., 2004; Gutierrez-Zotes et al., 2012)Baseline and 3-month follow-upCognitive insight self-registered measure (15 items): ability to analyze one's own beliefs and judgments. Self-reflectivness subscale: higher scores indicate a greater ability to reflect on one's own thoughts. Selfcertainty subscale: higher scores indicate a greater tendency to overestimate one's own beliefs without considering alternative explanations. Composite index: higher scores indicate a greater cognitive insight.
Change from Baseline Beads Task at 3 months (Brett-Jones et al., 1987)Baseline and 3-month follow-upMeasure of jumping to conclusions bias. It includes two tasks in which two jars with colored beads are presented. The first task has a 85:15 proportion and the second task has a 60:40 proportion. In the third task, the jars contain positive and negative comments, with a proportion of 60:40 in each jar. The person has to infer from which jar the beads or comments are drawn. Jumping to conclusions bias is present when the participant decides after seeing up to two beads or comments.
Change from Baseline CBQ Cognitive Bias Questionnaire at 3 months (Peters et al, 2013; Gutiérrez-Zotes, 2021)Baseline and 3-month follow-upMeasure of five cognitive biases (30 items): jumping to conclusions, intentionalising, catastrophising, emotional reasoning, and dichotomous thinking.
Change from Baseline Stress Test at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upAssessment of clinical and sports records, cardiorespiratory and locomotor system examination, electrocardiogram and ergometry.
Change from Baseline Molecular measures at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upProtein levels of SP1 and SP4 biomarkers transcription factor levels in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). mRNA expression levels of SP1 and SP4 biomarkers transcription factors in PBMCs.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Faces test at 3 months (Baron Cohen, 1997; Huerta-Ramos et al., 2021)Baseline and 3-month follow-upFacial emotion recognition
Change from Baseline MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery at 3 months (Nuechterlein et al., 2008; Rodriguez-Jimenez et al., 2012)Baseline and 3-month follow-upVerbal processing speed, verbal fluency, attention, working memory, verbal learning and memory, visual learning and memory, reasoning, problem solving.
WAIS-IV (Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale, 1955)BaselinePremorbid IQ assessed with the Vocabulary subscale
Change from Baseline GAF Global Assessment of Functioning at 3 months (Endicot et al., 1976)Baseline and 3-month follow-upGeneral functioning in a scale of 0-100
Change from Baseline WHO-DAS 12, Psychiatric Disability Assessment Schedule at 3 months (WHO, 1988; Vázquez-Barquero JL, 2000)Baseline and 3-month follow-upSelf-administered 12-item disability assessment
Change from Baseline SSQ Self Stigma Questionnaire at 3 months (Ochoa et al., 2015)Baseline and 3-month follow-upSelf-administered 14-item scale to assess self-stigma
Change from Baseline EuroQoL EQ-5D at 3 months (Badia et al., 1999)Baseline and 3-month follow-upSelf-administered 5-item to assess general quality of life
Change from Baseline SUMD Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder at 3 months (Amador X.F., et al.; 1993; Ruiz A., et al., 2008)Baseline and 3-month follow-up3 items to assess awareness of having a mental illness, awareness of medication effects and awareness of social consequences of having a mental illness, in a scale of 0-15. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Change from Heart Rate at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upBeats per minute (bpm)
Change from Blood Pressure at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upMillimetre of mercury (mmHg)
Change from Baseline PANSS Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale at 3 months (Kay et al., 1987; Peralta y Cuesta, 1995)Baseline and 3-month follow-upSemi-structured interview to assess positive, negative and general symptoms of psychosis. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms.
Change from Height at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upCentimetre (cm)
Change from Body Mass Index (BMI) at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upWeight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m\^2
Change from Body Abdominal Girth at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upCentimetre (cm)
Change from Glucose Levels at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upMilligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Change from Total Cholesterol at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upMilligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Change from HDL Cholesterol at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upMilligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Change from LDL Cholesterol at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upMilligrams per decilitre (mg/dL)
Change from International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ; Booth, 2000) at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upIntensity of physical activity and sitting time
Change from Oviedo Sleep Questionnaire (OSQ; Bobes et al., 2000) at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upSleep quality
Change from Weight at 3 monthsBaseline and 3-month follow-upKilogram (Kg)
Change from Baseline BDI-II Beck Depression Inventory-II at 3 months (Beck et al., 1996)Baseline and 3-month follow-upDepressive symptoms
Change from Baseline Rosenberg self-esteem scale at 3 months (Martín Albó et al, 2007)Baseline and 3-month follow-upSelf-esteem measure with 10 items (scores 0 to 30). Higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. Scores below 15 may indicate problematic low self-esteem.
Change from Baseline IPSAQ Internal, Personal and Situational Attributions Questionnaire at 3 months (McArthur, 1972; Bentall et al, 1991; Diez-Alegría, 2006)Baseline and 3-month follow-upAttributional Style, including externalizing and personalizing bias subscales.
Change from Baseline Hinting Task at 3 months (Corcoran, Mercer & Frith, 1995)Baseline and 3-month follow-upTheory of mind

Countries

Spain

Contacts

Primary ContactSusana Ochoa, PhD
susana.ochoa@sjd.es936406350

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026