Skip to content

Effect of Different Water Injection Temperatures on the Safety and Comfort of Patients Undergoing Ultrasound Endoscopy of Small Probes Under Intravenous Anesthesia

Effect of Different Water Injection Temperatures on the Safety and Comfort of Patients Undergoing Ultrasound Endoscopy of Small Probes Under Intravenous Anesthesia

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05454475
Enrollment
270
Registered
2022-07-12
Start date
2022-06-14
Completion date
2023-06-30
Last updated
2025-12-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Small Probe Ultrasound Endoscopy, The Water Temperature

Brief summary

Miniprobe endoscopic ultrasonography (mEUS) is a key diagnostic modality for gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal or submucosal lesions, requiring water infusion to eliminate intraluminal air and improve image clarity. However, the optimal water temperature for sedated mEUS remains uncertain-previous studies suggest water temperature may affect GI peristalsis, haemodynamics, image quality, and patient safety/comfort, but no research has focused on this topic in sedated mEUS. This is a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled study. Eligible patients (≥18 years with GI mucosal/submucosal lesions requiring sedated mEUS) are randomly assigned to three groups based on water temperature: cold water (6-10 °C), warm water (20-24 °C), and hot water (35-39 °C). The primary objectives are to evaluate the effects of different water temperatures on mEUS image quality (standardized scoring) and diagnostic accuracy. Secondary outcomes include GI peristaltic grade, haemodynamic indices (measured at 6 time points), adverse events, and patient somatic/psychological feeling, comfort, and satisfaction scores. The study aims to identify the optimal water temperature that reduces GI peristalsis, improves mEUS diagnostic performance, and ensures patient safety and comfort during sedated mEUS, providing evidence for standardized clinical practice.

Interventions

OTHERChange the water injection temperature

Water injection is a routine procedure for endoscopy of small probe ultrasound, and our intervention is to change the water temperature and observe the effects of different water temperatures on patient safety and comfort.

Sponsors

The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old; * Gastrointestinal (GI) mucosal or submucosal lesions detected by general endoscopy; * Require small-probe ultrasonic endoscopy (mEUS) under sedation for definitive diagnosis; * Clearly understand the study and voluntarily participate, with informed consent provided.

Exclusion criteria

* Failure to meet the requirements for mEUS examination and anaesthesia, or need to use multiple sedative and analgesic drugs; * Pregnancy or breastfeeding; * Chronic use of opioids and benzodiazepines; * Structural changes in the GI tract caused by abdominal surgery; * Presence of mental illness; * Presence of lesions in the oesophagus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mEUS image qualityFrom examination initiation through 24 hours post-examinationAssessed by two independent experts (excluding the operating endoscopist) using Soon's scoring method on a 1-5 scale: 1 = air artifact obscures target lesion; 2 = air artifact severely impairs lesion size/characteristic assessment; 3 = air artifact mildly impairs lesion size/characteristic assessment; 4 = air artifact present but does not compromise lesion assessment; 5 = no air artifact with unimpaired lesion assessment. Scores 1-2 = poor, 3-4 = good, 5 = excellent.
mEUS diagnostic accuracyUp to 6 months after mEUS examinationGold standard confirmation: surgical, ESD or puncture histopathological results for patients with tissue specimens; ≥6-month clinical follow-up (based on manifestations, test results, lesion size and echogenic changes) for determining benign/malignant nature in other patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gastrointestinal (GI) peristaltic gradeDuring mEUS examinationAssessed by two independent experts (excluding the operating endoscopist) via recorded video, using Hiki's upper GI peristaltic score and Likman Mui's lower GI peristaltic score (1=no peristalsis; 5=markedly vigorous peristalsis).
Haemodynamic indicesAt T0, T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 time pointsIncludes mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen saturation (SpO2); measured at 6 time points: anaesthesia assessment (T0), endoscopy (T1), before water infusion (T2), at water infusion (T3), after total water aspiration (T4), and at wakefulness (T5).
Adverse eventsPeriprocedural (from anesthesia assessment to post-anesthesia wakefulness)Includes coughing, choking, aspiration, hypotension (MAP during/after water infusion \<20% of pre-infusion level), bradycardia (HR \<50 beats/min), tachycardia (HR \>100 beats/min), hypoxaemia (SpO2 \<90%), bleeding, perforation, and infection.
Somatic and psychological feeling scoresPost-anesthesia recovery (Day 1)Assessed via questionnaire post-anesthesia recovery: somatic discomfort (nausea/vomiting, bloating, coldness, anxiety); pain (VAS: 0=no pain to 10=severe pain); comfort and satisfaction (5-point Likert scale: 1=very uncomfortable/dissatisfied to 5=very comfortable/satisfied).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026