Skip to content

Asleep MRI-guided Versus Awake Microelectrode Recording Guided Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Asleep MRI-guided and CT-verified Versus Awake Microelectrode Recording Guided Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus in Parkinson's Disease: A Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05453331
Acronym
ACCURATE
Enrollment
158
Registered
2022-07-12
Start date
2022-10-31
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2022-07-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Deep Brain Stimulation, Parkinson Disease, subthalamic nucleus

Brief summary

Rationale: Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a well-accepted treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Traditionally, the procedure is performed awake and under local anaesthesia to facilitate intraoperative monitoring via microelectrode recording and test stimulation for exact electrode positioning. Advances in MR imaging allow for clear visualization of the STN and therefore direct targeting. Retrospective series suggest that MRI-guided and image (CT or MRI)-verified STN-DBS under general anaesthesia yields a similar motor outcome and quality of life (QoL) as awake and microelectrode recording-guided surgery with intra-operative clinical testing. MRI-guided and image (CT or MRI)- verified approach potentially has advantages in terms of patient experience and cost-effectiveness. The study proposed here is the first in the world to directly compare both methods. Objective: To compare bilateral MRI-guided and CT-verified STN-DBS under general anaesthesia to awake microelectrode-guided bilateral STN-DBS with intra-operative clinical testing in terms of motor improvement. Study design: A multicentre comparative effectiveness trial with a non-inferiority design. Study population: 158 PD people eligible for bilateral STN-DBS (79 in each arm). Intervention: This study compares two modalities of standard treatment. One arm receives awake microelectrode recording guided bilateral STN-DBS under local anaesthesia with intraoperative clinical testing. The other arm receives MRI-guided and CT-verified bilateral STN-DBS under general anaesthesia. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the change from baseline to one year in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III) scores (OFF Medication) versus the postoperative scores (OFF medication and ON stimulation). Secondary objectives include patient experience, quality of life, adverse effects and complications, neuropsychological examination, non-motor symptoms (including psychiatric evaluation), reduction in anti-parkinsonian medication, activities of daily living (ADL) functioning and cost- effectiveness.

Interventions

bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in people with Parkinson's disease

Sponsors

Maastricht University Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
HagaZiekenhuis
CollaboratorOTHER
Radboud University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 30-75 years of age * Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (according to the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease) * Disease duration ≥ 4 years * Hoehn & Yahr ≤ 3 (in best ON-medication condition) * Despite optimal pharmacological treatment, at least one of the following symptoms: * Disturbing response fluctuation * Dyskinesia * Painful dystonia * Drug-resistant tremor * ≥30% improvement of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III score in a levodopa challenge test, except for tremor dominant PD. This is conform daily clinical practice in all participating centres. * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Dementia (Montreal Cognitive Assessment ≤ 25) * Previous neurosurgical procedures for PD * Structural lesions on brain MRI * Contra-indications for DBS surgery * Contra-indications for MRI * Current depression or history recurrent severe depression * History of psychosis * Need for nursing care * Life expectancy \< 2 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (min 0, max. 132; higher score means worse outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
health-related quality of life12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39; min. 0, max. 156; higher score means worse outcome)
Non-motor aspects of experiences of daily living12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part I (min. 0, max. 52; higher score means worse outcome)
Motor aspects of experiences of daily living measured12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part II (min. 0, max. 52; higher score means worse outcome)
Motor complications after DBS surgery12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part IV (min. 0, max. 24; higher score means worse outcome)
Patient experience and satisfactionduring hospitalization and follow up visits at approximately 2 weeks after surgery, 6 and 12 monthsDeep Brain Stimulation Patient Experience Rating Scale (min. 0, max. 224, higher score means better outcome)
Depressive symptoms12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II; min. 0, max. 63, higher score means worse outcome)
Non-Motor Symptoms12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Non-Motor Symptoms Assessment Scale (NMSS) for Parkinson's disease (min. 0, max. 360, higher score means worse outcome)
reduction in anti-parkinsonian medication12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD)
Cognitive impairment12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Montreal Cognitive Assignment (MoCA; min. 0, max. 30, higher score means better outcome)
Anxiety12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Parkinson Anxiety Scale (PAS, min. 0, max. 12, higher score means worse outcome)
Autonomic symptoms12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease - Autonomic Dysfunction (SCOPA-AUT, min. 0, max. 69, higher score means worse outcome)
Neuropsychiatric symptoms12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in he Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q, min. 0, max. 36, higher score means worse outcome)
Patient's sleepiness12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS; min. 0, max. 24; higher score means worse outcome)
Complications and (serious) adverse effects12 monthsmeasured with a standardized check list
Cost effectivenessduring hospitalization (range 3-5 days, median 4 days)measured indirectly by duration of operation and duration of hospitalization
Impulsivity12 monthschange from baseline to 1 year in Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease (QUIP; min. 0, max. 112, higher score means worse outcome)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026