Skip to content

Open Retropubic Versus Laparoscopic Colposuspension (Burch Operation) Techniques for Female Stress or Mixed Urinary Incontinence; A Ten-year Experience in a Tertiary Center

Open Retropubic Versus Laparoscopic Colposuspension (Burch Operation) Techniques for Female Stress or Mixed Urinary Incontinence; A Ten-year Experience in a Tertiary Center

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05452811
Enrollment
150
Registered
2022-07-11
Start date
2022-05-15
Completion date
2022-10-30
Last updated
2022-12-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

Burch colposuspension, laparoscopy, outcome, retropubic, stress urinary incontinence

Brief summary

To evaluate postoperative course, efficacy, and complication rates of Open Burch Colposuspension and Laparoscopic Burch Colposuspension techniques in stress or mixed urinary incontinence at a single training and research hospital over the last 10 years in Istanbul, Turkey.

Detailed description

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in all Burch Colposuspension cases performed between January 2001 and May 2022 at Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Training and Research Center. All patients' data were reviewed from the electronic medical records and analyzed who underwent Burch colposuspension surgery either with an open or laparoscopic approach. The primary outcome was surgical success, whereas secondary outcomes were perioperative and postoperative data including surgical type (open or laparoscopic), operating time, duration of hospital stay, estimated blood loss, complications during surgery, and additional interventional procedure types.

Interventions

Anti-incontinence surgery for stress urinary incontinence

Sponsors

Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
30 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients having SUI or mixed urinary incontinence whom conservative therapy (Kegel's pelvic floor exercises, bladder training, electrical stimulation, or medication) failed * SUI had been proven by urodynamic assessments. * patients who had urethral hypermobility supported by a Q-type test with a cotton swab angle greater than 300 * patients having a residual urinary volume of less than 100 mL were included.

Exclusion criteria

* history of anti-incontinence surgery * pelvic inflammatory diseases * urinary retention * SUI with intrinsic sphincter deficiency * neurogenic bladder * suspected malignancy * urge incontinence * chronic cystitis * urinary tract infection * prescription of anticoagulant or antipsychotic treatment * coagulation disorders * physically and medically unsuitable for colposuspension surgery * pregnancy and loss to follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Surgical success12 months after interventionProvided by the patient's feeling of the Absence of a bulge in the vagina

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
estimated blood lossintraoperativeBlood loss during surgery ( taking blood count-WBC)
complicationsup to 6 weeksComplications occurring in between during surgery and 6.th week of surgery

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026