Skip to content

Acupuncture Augmentation for Inpatients With Major Depression Disorder

Acupuncture Augmentation Therapy for In-hospital Patients With Major Depression Disorder: a Pragmatic, Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05452746
Enrollment
84
Registered
2022-07-11
Start date
2022-06-24
Completion date
2025-05-31
Last updated
2022-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression

Keywords

Acupuncture

Brief summary

Acupuncture practice is based on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) principles of harmonization and balance, and the need to maintain unobstructed flow of energy (Qi) to attain efficient body functioning and metabolism so as to attain good mental and physical state of health. While increasing numbers of patients are seeking acupuncture treatment for depression in recent years, there is limited evidence of the effectiveness of acupuncture for in-hospital patients with severe depressive conditions and comorbid cognitive dysfunction, who need intensive antidepression care. In this study, we propose a randomized clinical trial to test the clinical efficacy of acupuncture treatment for in-hospital patients who are suffering from major depressive disorder. A total of 84 patients will be 1:1 randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups in a single-blind randomized controlled trial. The specific intervention arm involved daily augmentation TCM-style acupuncture with manual stimulation for total 10 sessions; the control arm is consisted of patients with treatment as usual (TAU), i. e. waitlist condition who will receive standard antidepressant medication with or without psychotherapies. Patients in TAU arm will be offered one free course (total 10 sessions) of acupuncture treatment in TCM outpatient clinic after they have been discharged from the ward. All patients' depressive symptoms, cognitive function, quality of life and functioning will be assessed and compared at pre-treatment (baseline), immediately after in-hospital acupuncture treatment, one-month post-treatment and 3-month post-treatment. In addition, we will analyze the association of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with the treatment effect of acupuncture. This study will be the first study to examine whether acupuncture is a viable augmentation treatment for in-hospital patients with depression. Expected outcomes will include determining the relative short and medium-term clinical effects from the most commonly used acupuncture treatment modalities in a local and multiethnic population.

Interventions

DEVICEAcupuncture

Unilateral and bilateral acupuncture points: Du 20 and GV 29,39 MS1, MS2, MS3 and MS4,40 Location of points: Number of needles: 9 Depth of insertion: MS1, MS2, MS3: insert the needle obliquely in the frontal direction for 1 cm Du 20: insert the needle obliquely in the frontal direction for 0.5 cm GV 29: insert the needle obliquely and downward for 0.5 cm Needles retained for 20 min Needle type: Han Yi 0.25x25 mm Treatment regimen: once per day for 2 weeks

OTHERTreatment as usual

Inpatient psychiatric care for depression

Sponsors

Nanyang Technological University
CollaboratorOTHER
Institute of Mental Health, Singapore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessor blinded to treatment allocation

Intervention model description

Randomized single blinded controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥21 years. 2. DSM-V diagnosis of current Major Depressive Episode. 3. Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale score of 20 or more. 4. Able to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of psychosis or mania 2. With current ECT or neurostimulation treatment. 3. With severe heart or renal condition 4. Currently taking blood thinning drug including Aspirin etc. 5. Endocrine abnormalities (e.g., hypothyroidism, unstable diabetes); 6. History of central nervous system involvement (e.g., seizures, brain injury, neurologic ill- ness); 7. Pregnancy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (objective, clinician administered).2 week post treatmentMADRS is a ten-item diagnostic questionnaire which psychiatrists use to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorder (scored 0 to 60 with higher scores meaning worse outcome)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) (clinician administered).2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months post treatmentMoCA was validated in the setting of mild cognitive impairment,44 and has subsequently been adopted in numerous other settings clinically. (scored 0 to 30 with higher scores indicating better outcome)
EQ-5D (self-administered)2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months post treatmentEQ-5D is a standardized measure of health-related QoL developed by the EuroQol Group to provide a simple, generic questionnaire for use in clinical and economic appraisal and population health surveys
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology- Self report 16 items (QIDS-SR16) (subjective, self-administered)2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months post treatmentThe QIDS-SR16 has highly acceptable psychometric properties, which supports the usefulness of this brief rating of depressive symptom severity in both clinical and research settings
Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (clinician administered)2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months post treatmentGAF is a scoring system that mental health professionals use to assess how well an individual is functioning in their daily lives (Scored 0-100 with higher score indicating better outcomes)
TCM Assessment Form (Depression)2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months post treatment

Countries

Singapore

Contacts

Primary ContactPhern Chern Tor, MBBS
phern_chern_tor@imh.com.sg63892000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026