EMG, Exercise, Soccer, Vascular Occlusion
Conditions
Brief summary
The blood flow restriction method can have similar or superior effects to high-intensity exercises even in a short duration, which can positively affect some performance parameters, can be applied with low-intensity load and cause hypertrophy in the muscle by providing high metabolic stress, facilitating muscle growth without significantly changing the total training dose. The aim of this study is to investigate whether adding the blood flow restriction method to the classical training program can be more effective than the classical training applied alone in the development of football-related performance parameters.
Interventions
OTHERBlood Flow Restriction
Blood flow restriction with low load (30-50% 1RM) for 2 sessions in a week for 6 weeks during classical training will be applied.
OTHERClassical Training Alone
Classical training same as Group 1with moderate to high load (70-90% 1RM) for 2 sessions in a week for 6 weeks will be applied without blood restriction.
Sponsors
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Biruni University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 30 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Being a male between the ages of 18-30 years * Volunteer to participate in the study * Playing football in one of the clubs in Istanbul for at least 1 year * Being in the pre-season of the club * Absence of any ongoing musculoskeletal problems that limit exercising
Exclusion criteria
* Having at least one of the contraindications preventing the application of blood flow restriction (Smoking, previous venous thromboembolism, risk of peripheral vascular disease (ankle-brachial index \<0.9), coronary heart disease, hypertension, hemophilia, etc.). * History of sports injury in the last 6 months * Orthopedic lower extremity surgery in the last 1 year * Body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Muscle Strength and Endurance | 6 weeks | Isokinetic dynamometer |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Aerobic Endurance | 6 weeks | Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Level 1 test |
| Evaluation of Change of Direction Speed | 6 weeks | T Test |
| Evaluation of Reactive Agility | 6 weeks | Y-Shaped Reactive Agility Test |
| Evaluation of Lower Extremity Power | 6 weeks | Vertical jump test |
| Systemic Fatigue | 6 weeks | Lactate analysis |
| General Perceived Fatigue | 6 weeks | Borg scale |
| Evaluation of General Satisfaction and Perceived Performance Change | 6th week | General satisfaction and the change in performance perceived by the participants will be evaluated with the 7 points Global Rating of Change Scale after the training program. According to the scale, it is expressed as -3: I am much worse, -2: I am worse, -1: I am a little worse, 0: No change, 1: I am a little better, 2: I am better, 3: I am much better. |
| Evaluation of Dynamic Balance | 6 weeks | Y Balance Test |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed