Skip to content

Immediate Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Approach for Walled-off Necrosis

Immediate Necrosectomy vs. Step-up Approach After EUS-guided Drainage of Walled-off Necrosis: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (WONDER-01)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05451901
Acronym
WONDER-01
Enrollment
70
Registered
2022-07-11
Start date
2022-07-29
Completion date
2031-04-11
Last updated
2022-10-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Fluid Collection, Pancreatic Pseudocyst, Pancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing, Walled-off Necrosis

Keywords

Endosonography, Drainage, Stents, Endoscopic necrosectomy, Step-up approach

Brief summary

Walled-off necrosis (WON) is a pancreatic fluid collection, which contains necrotic tissue after four weeks of the onset of acute pancreatitis. Interventions are required to manage patients with infected WON, for which endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage has become a first-line treatment modality. For patients who are refractory to EUS-guided drainage, the step-up treatment including endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) and/or additional drainage is considered to subside the infection. Recent evidence suggests that EN immediately after EUS-guided drainage may shorten treatment duration without increasing adverse events. In this randomized trial, the investigators will compare treatment duration between EN immediately after EUS-guided drainage versus the step-up approach in patients with symptomatic WON.

Detailed description

Pancreatic fluid collection is a late complication of severe acute pancreatitis. According to the revised Atlanta classification, walled-off necrosis (WON) is defined as an encapsulated collection of necrotic tissue that is observed after four weeks of the onset of acute pancreatitis. Infected WON is associated with high morbidity and mortality; therefore, an appropriate treatment, including antibiotics and drainage, is mandatory. With the development of endoscopic equipment, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage has become a first-line treatment modality for infected WON. For patients who are refractory to EUS-guided drainage, endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) is a treatment option to facilitate direct removal of infected necrotic tissue within the WON. However, due to potentially lethal adverse events of EN, such as bleeding, perforation, and peritonitis, EN is usually withheld for several days after EUS-guided drainage. This strategy is known as the step-up approach. Recently, with the accumulated evidence supporting the safety of EN, especially with the use of a dedicated lumen-apposing metal stent, it has been reported that EN immediately after EUS-guided drainage can shorten the treatment duration without increasing adverse events. Given these lines of evidence, the investigators hypothesized that immediate EN following EUS-guided drainage of WON might shorten time to clinical success compared to the step-up approach. To examine this hypothesis, the investigators planned to conduct a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing treatment duration between EN immediately after EUS-guided drainage versus the step-up approach in patients with symptomatic WON.

Interventions

PROCEDUREImmediate necrosectomy

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage will be conducted within 72 hours from randomization. A convex-type echoendoscope is advanced to the stomach or duodenum, and the walled-off necrosis (WON) is visualized and punctured under EUS guidance. A lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), such as Hot AXIOS system (Boston Scientific Japan, Tokyo, Japan), is recommended for the initial EUS-guided drainage. For the immediate necrosectomy group, endoscopic necrosectomy (EN) will be performed in the same session of EUS-guided drainage using a gastroscope. The endoscope is inserted into the WON cavity through the LAMS, and necrotic tissue is removed using biopsy forceps, snare, or basket catheter. The EN procedures will be repeated until clinical improvement.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage will be conducted within 72 hours from randomization. A convex-type echoendoscope is advanced to the stomach or duodenum, and the walled-off necrosis (WON) is visualized and punctured under EUS guidance. A lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS), such as Hot AXIOS system (Boston Scientific Japan, Tokyo, Japan), is recommended for the initial EUS-guided drainage. For the step-up approach group, an additional interventional procedure will be withheld for 72-96 hours after initial EUS-guided drainage. In cases without clinical improvement after 72-96 hours, additional drainage will be permitted, which includes increasing the number of stents, additional EUS-guided drainage, and performing percutaneous drainage (step-up treatment). Insufficient improvement even after two times of step-up treatment allows subsequent endoscopic necrosectomy (EN).

Sponsors

Tokyo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with WON defined according to the revised Atlanta classification * The longest diameter of WON is 4 cm or larger * Patients with at least one out of the following conditions; signs of infection, gastrointestinal symptoms, abdominal symptoms, obstructive jaundice * Patients who need drainage for WON * Age of 18 years or older * Patients or their representatives provide informed consent * Patients who visit or are hospitalized at the participating institutions

Exclusion criteria

* WON inaccessible by EUS-guided approach * AXIOS stent has already been placed into the WON prior to the enrollment * Severe coagulopathy; Platelet count \< 50,000/mm3 or prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) \>1.5 * Patients on antithrombotic agents which cannot be managed according to the guideline for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment (Dig Endosc. 2014 Jan;26(1):1-14.) * Patients who cannot tolerate endoscopic procedures * Pregnant women * Patients considered inappropriate for inclusion by investigators

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to clinical success from randomizationSix monthsClinical success is defined as 1) a decrease in the WON size to 3 cm or less and 2) an improvement of more than two out of the three following inflammatory markers; body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
New onset of pseudocystFive yearsIncidence of new-onset pancreatic pseudocyst
Cost of interventions and hospital staySix monthsTotal cost of interventions and total cost of hospitalization
Recurrence of WONFive yearsIncidence of recurrence of WON
Time to recurrence of WONFive yearsTime from clinical success to recurrence of WON
Treatment duration of recurrent WONFive yearsTotal treatment period for recurrent WON
Adverse eventsFive yearsAll procedure-related adverse events including bleeding, perforation, peritonitis, etc.
MortalityFive yearsMortality from any cause
Technical success rate of initial EUS-PCD (Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided pseudocyst drainage)One daySuccessful placement of EUS-guided drainage including a lumen-apposing metal stent and plastic stents
Incidence of biliary and gastrointestinal strictureFive yearsInflammatory-induced obstruction of bile duct and gastrointestinal tract
Number and time of interventionsSix monthsTotal number of interventions and total procedure time
Indwelling time of endoscopic and percutaneous drainageSix monthsIndwelling period of stents and drainage tube
Success rate and operation time of surgical proceduresSix monthsSuccess rate of surgeries associated with WON and total operation time
Hospital stay and ICU staySix monthsTotal hospitalization days and total ICU stay
Duration of antibiotics administrationSix monthsTotal administration days of antibiotics
Treatment duration of new onset pseudocystFive yearsTotal treatment period for new-onset pancreatic pseudocyst
Incidence of new onset diabetes, clinical symptoms of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, and pancreatic cancerFive yearsNew-onset diabetes mellitus, pancreatic cancer, and clinical symptoms associated with pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, such as steatorrhea , constipation, diarrhea, maldigestion, flatulence, and tenesmus
The presence and timing of medications for pancreatic exocrine insufficiencyFive yearsThe start of medications for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and the date
The presence and timing of sarcopeniaFive yearsThe presence of sarcopenia and the date of diagnosis
Morphological change of pancreasFive yearsChange in the morphology and the volume of pancreas

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Primary ContactYousuke Nakai
ynakai-tky@umin.ac.jp+81-3-3815-5411
Backup ContactTomotaka Saito
tomsaito-gi@umin.ac.jp+81-3-3815-5411

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026