Skip to content

Prevention of Injury in Military Settings Through the Use of Body Awareness.

Prevention of Fall Injury in Military Settings Through the Use of Body Awareness.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05451394
Acronym
POSITION
Enrollment
500
Registered
2022-07-11
Start date
2021-10-17
Completion date
2023-09-29
Last updated
2026-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Traumatic Injury

Brief summary

The POSITION project aims to investigate the cognitive mechanism of postural body awareness as a risk factor for injury and as a target for a primary prevention strategy based on the Resource Optimization of Armed Forces (ROAF) method.

Detailed description

Physical activity and sport play an important role in the military environment to develop and optimize the operational capability of warfighters. Nevertheless, the prevalence of injuries is high and the identification of risk factors accessible to primary prevention measures is a major challenge for the protection of warfighter health. Military epidemiologic data show that the majority of injuries are acute fall-type injuries following a loss of balance. These data suggest that the quality of postural balance may influence the occurrence of injuries encountered during military physical activities. The high level of stress to which individuals are exposed during military physical activities could contribute to the degradation of postural balance quality. The POSITION project aims to study the cognitive mechanism of postural body awareness as a risk factor for injury and as a target for a primary prevention strategy based on the Resource Optimization of Armed Forces (ROAF) method. ROAF could improve postural control and decrease the intensity of the psychobiological stress response, and thus reduce the incidence rate of fall injuries occurring during military physical activities.

Interventions

OTHERROAF

Use of the method "Ressource Optimisation of Armed Forces (ROAF). 6 one-hour workshops

OTHERActive Comparator

6 one-hour workshops on cognitive process

Sponsors

Direction Centrale du Service de Santé des Armées
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The preventive program will be deployed in the first unit selection camp, then in the second the "active control program" will be deployed.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Signing an informed consent to participate in the study * enrolled in the selection camp * Be affiliated to a Social Security system

Exclusion criteria

* advanced ROAF formation (over 10 hours) * Refusal to participate * Person covered by articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the public health code, namely * Pregnant women, women in labour or nursing mothers, * person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, * persons subject to psychiatric monitoring under Articles L3112-1 and L3113-1 who are not covered by the provisions of Article L1121-8, * adult persons who are subject to a legal protection measure or who are unable to express their consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence rate of imbalance injuries in each of the two groups (ROAF vs active control).3 weeksThe primary endpoint will be the incidence rate of imbalance injuries in each of the two groups (ROAF vs active control).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Evolution of postural awareness measured by the postural awareness scale.3 weeksEvolution of the self-questionnaire measuring postural awareness completed at inclusion, at the final visit and at the beginning of each workshop; 8 times in total.
Evolution of postural balance3 weeksDifference between postural balance assessed during the inclusion visit and the final visit, using a posturography tool.
Evolution of the stress level measured by the perceived stress scale3 weeksEvolution of the self-questionnaire measuring perceived stress completed at inclusion, at the final visit, and at the beginning of each workshop; 8 times in total.
Evolution of the hormonal stress level.3 weeksDifference of levels of hormonal stress in a saliva sample (at the inclusion and final visit).

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 10, 2026