Skip to content

Rehabilitation of Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICU With Limited Resources

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Functional Rehabilitation Protocol in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Variants in ICUs With Limited Resources: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05450120
Enrollment
88
Registered
2022-07-08
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
2022-12-01
Last updated
2022-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

COVID-19, intensive care unit, early mobilization, rehabilitation, electrical stimulation, muscle weakness

Brief summary

Acute rehabilitation in critically ill patients can improve post-intensive care unit (post-ICU) physical function. Scientific evidence has considered neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) as a promising approach for the early rehabilitation of patients during and/or after ICU. Neuromuscular electrostimulation can be an alternative form of muscle exercise that helps to gain strength in critically ill patients with COVID -19, due to the severe weakness that patients experience due to longer MV, analgesia and NMB duration. Thus, the general objective of evaluating the effects of an early rehabilitation protocol on the strength and functionality of patients affected by SARS-CoV-2 variants and specifically compare the effectiveness of NMES associated with the functional rehabilitation protocol(FR). Also, describe demographics, clinical status, ICU therapies, mortality estimates and Hospital outcomes, of every patients admitted in ICU during the observation periods.

Detailed description

Patients in both groups received the functional rehabilitation protocol adapted from the precoce mobilization protocol of Morris et al, 2008. The protocol was defined in 5 stages, with a period between the application of the stages according to the clinical conditions of the patient, in an interval maximum of 24 hours from the beginning of the application of the first stage. The steps included active assisted mobilization exercises, active with Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) method diagonals for upper limbs and bridge exercises, bedside sitting, balance reactions, weight bearing, transfer to an armchair, passive and active orthostatism, static gait and ambulation. The experimental group also received a protocol of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), applied bilaterally for 30 minutes, using an electrical stimulator with rectangular pulse waves, symmetrical biphasic, applied to the quadriceps femoris and tibialis anterior muscle at the best motor point, activating fast fibers with a pulse time of less than 300 ms and slow pulses with a pulse time of more than 300 ms, with intensity adjusted to obtain visible muscle contraction and/or according to the patient's tolerance.

Interventions

Functional rehabilitation protocol

OTHERNeuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Sao Carlos
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects admitted in ICU for \>72hs, undergoing orotracheal intubation and on mechanical ventilation for \>48hs, with a diagnosis of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) according to Berlin definition secondary to COVID-19, with shock or organ failure, according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Protocol for Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (7th Interim Edition) Guideline, and clinical stability: * mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg; * heart rate \>60 and \<120 beats/minute; * respiratory rate \<30 breaths/minute; * oxygen saturation ≥ 92%; * fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ≤0.6; * absence of vasopressor dose increase * absence of dysrhythmia (except for chronic atrial fibrillation); * controlled sepsis; * hemoglobin (Hb) \> 8g m/d, plaquettes \>20.000, Glucemia \>70 e \<180; * without NMBs

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with movement resistance * Walking without assistance before the ICU (except using a cane) * Cognitive impairment before acute illness * Signs of intracranial hypertension, neuromuscular disease (myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Guillain-Barré) and stroke; hip fracture, unstable cervical spine, or pathological fracture * Prior hospitalization (30 days before ICU) * Readmission to the ICU, within the current hospitalization * Presence of an implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, pregnancy, acute myocardial infarction and, for the experimental group (EG), against indications for NMES (deep vein thrombosis, skin lesions, rhabdomyolysis).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skeletal muscle strength5 monthsImproved skeletal muscle strength by modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)
Functional independence5 monthsImproved level of functional independence by ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) and Functional Status Score for the ICU (FSS-ICU)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mechanical ventilation and hospitalization5 monthsMechanical ventilation time, ICU and hospital stay.
Survived and discharged5 monthsProportion of patients who survived and were discharged.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026