Skip to content

Fifth Metatarsal Orthopedic Outcome Trial

Treatment of Fifth Metatarsal Shaft Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05450107
Acronym
FOOT
Enrollment
64
Registered
2022-07-08
Start date
2022-09-01
Completion date
2024-12-31
Last updated
2023-03-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metatarsal Fracture

Brief summary

Fractures of the shaft, distal to zone three, of the fifth metatarsal often occur after foot distortion. There is very little evidence available regarding the optimal treatment. Currently the most common treatment is prolonged cast immobilization. Operative treatment has been reported as an alternative and could promote early recovery. No comparative study has been published regarding optimal treatment

Detailed description

Objective: The main objective is to determine experienced pain, as measured by NRS-11 score, 3 months after intervention and compare this between the intervention and control group. Secondary objectives are functional outcome as measured by AOFAS Lesser Toe Scale, FAAM score, progress of NRS-11 score through time and PROMIS Mobility/pain interference. Furthermore, quality and duration of fracture healing will be compared between groups. The impact on daily life will be compared as measured by duration of return to work and normal footwear. Study design: Randomised controlled clinical intervention trial Study population: Humans with an acute shaft fracture of the fifth metatarsal bone, 18 years or older.

Interventions

Surgical intervention by lag screw or plate fixation

PROCEDURECast immobilisation

Cast immobilsation for a total of 6 weeks with gradual increase in weight bearing after 2 weeks

Sponsors

Isala
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized controlled clinical intervention trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years or older at the time of study entry * Informed consent * Competent to participate in follow up and fill out questionnaires * Dislocated (1mm or more on plain radiography) fracture of the shaft, distal from zone 3, of the fifth metatarsal according to the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) classification 87.5.3 A-C

Exclusion criteria

* Open fracture * Proximal fifth metatarsal fracture, Jones fracture * Clinically significant or symptomatic vascular or neurologic pathology on the ipsilateral leg * Former surgery or history of development disorder of the contralateral fifth metatarsal * Multiple fractured metatarsals in the affected foot * Medical history of Rheumatoid Arthritis * Unable to undergo surgical procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical rating scale-11 score for pain 3 months3 months after interventionNumerical rating scale, score ranging from 0-10 where 10 is a worse outcome

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American Orthopedic Foot &Ankle Society Lesser Toe Scale3 months after interventionAmerican Orthopedic Foot &Ankle Society Lesser Toe Scale between groups, functional outcome measure for patients with lesser toe (i.e. excluding hallux) and midfoot pathology. Score ranging from 0-100. A Higher score is a better outcome
Foot and Ankle Ability Measure6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months after interventionFoot and Ankle Ability Measure, a score with two subscales: Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and sports. The questions concern function of the foot and ankle. progression through different time points (6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months after intervention). Score ranging from 0-120. A higher score is a better outcome
Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System - Mobility6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months after interventionpatient reported outcome measures by using Computer Adaptive Testing. Results in a normalized score ranging from 0-100 where an average human being will score 50. Higher score is a better outcome.
Patient Reported Outcome Measure Information System - Pain Interference6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months after interventionPatient reported outcome measures by using Computer Adaptive Testing. Results in a normalized score ranging from 0-100 where an average human being will score 50. Higher score is a better outcome.
Numerical rating scale-11 score for pain through time0-12 months after interventionNumerical Rating Scale-11 score progression through different time points (6 weeks, 3,6 and 12 months after intervention. Score ranging from 0-10. A Higher score is a worse outcome
Return to normal footwear0-12 monthsDuration of return to normal footwear
Malunion6 weeks after interventionLength of fractured fifth metatarsal as compared to ipsilateral fifth metatarsal
Non union0-6 monthsDetermined by plain X-ray on 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months, categorical outcome
Return to work0-12 monthsDuration of resumption of work

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactMaarten Cornelissen, MD
m.p.cornelissen@isala.nl0886248117
Backup ContactRoelina Munnik-Hagewoud, PhD
r.munnik@isala.nl0886245375

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026