Skip to content

Transfemoral Versus Transradial Partial Splenic Artery Embolization in Patients With Hypersplenism

Transfemoral Versus Transradial Partial Splenic Artery Embolization in Patients With Hypersplenism, a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05446116
Enrollment
112
Registered
2022-07-06
Start date
2019-06-01
Completion date
2021-10-18
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypersplenism

Brief summary

The present study aimes at comparing the transradial and transfemoral approaches for partial splenic embolization in patients with hypersplenism.

Detailed description

Since its development in 1979, partial splenic embolization (PSE) has been universally accepted to treat patients with hypersplenism in preference to surgical splenectomy. The spleen is the primary source of antibodies, lymphocyte production, and responsible for phagocytosis of white cells. Additionally, it plays an essential role in the immune system. Unlike splenectomy, partial splenic embolization (PSE) maintained partial splenic function and was thought to be an effective alternative to treat thrombocytopenia and leukopenia resulted from hypersplenism with fewer complications. PSE is usually performed using a femoral artery approach that requires bed rest for a few hours. Recently, the transradial approach, with less obvious need for bed rest, has been more widely applied for cardiovascular intervention.

Interventions

PROCEDUREpartial splenic artery embolization

embolization of the splenic artery for the treatment of hypersplenism

Sponsors

Zagazig University
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with hypersplenism and severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50,000/mm3). 2. the functional status of the liver should be Child A or early B according to Child-Pugh classification (5-7 points) (albumin ≥ 2.8 g/dL, bilirubin ≤ 3 mg/dL, prothrombin time ≤ 4 or INR \< 1.7, no ascites, no encephalopathy). 3. Eligible for both femoral and radial puncture.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients referred for embolization as treatment of traumatic splenic injury. 2. Patients lost during follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural timeImmediately after the procedure is completeThe time interval from starting the anaethesia till completion of the procedure
Technical Success of the ProcedureImmediately after the procedure is completeThe achievement of a single puncture allowing access to splenic artery without periprocedural complications.
Average number of puncturesImmediately after the procedure is completeNumber of arterial punctures required to complete the procedure
Complications at access site30 daysAccess site adverse events such as vessel thrombosis, pseudoaneurysm or bleeding.
X-ray exposure durationImmediately after the procedure is completeDuration of flouroscopy exposure during the procedure
Length of hospital stay7 daysNumber of days that the patient will spend in the hospital after the procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Procedural complications30 daysAdverse events related to the procedure itself like splenic abscess, ascitis or portal vein thrombosis

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026