Skip to content

Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence

Clinical, Radiographic and Aesthetic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement With or Without Buccal Bone Dehiscence in the Anterior Maxilla

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05445986
Enrollment
29
Registered
2022-07-06
Start date
2019-08-01
Completion date
2021-10-30
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Implant Failed

Brief summary

Immediate implant placement has been advantageous in terms of reduced treatment time and fewer surgical interventions. Given the fact that the level of buccal bone acts as a major prognostic factor for IIP, the indications for immediate implant placement were suggested to be limited to intact alveolar sockets.In recent years, many attempts have been performed to compensate for the alveolar ridge resorption in immediate implant placement in compromised sockets. The clinical outcomes of IIP with guided tissue regeneration and connective tissue grafting using papilla preservation technique in compromised extraction sockets has not been previously reported.

Interventions

PROCEDUREflap elevation and guided bone regeneration

to rebuild the alveolar ridge convexity

PROCEDUREgap filling

to use biomaterials to fill the jumping gap

PROCEDUREconnective tissue graft

to change the soft tissue phenotype by connective tissue graft

Sponsors

Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with anterior failing teeth (from cainine to cainine) with the presence of neighbouring teeth * sufficient bone volume to achieve primary stability at implant insertion

Exclusion criteria

* with uncontrolled periodontitis * heavy smoker (\>10 cigarettes/day) * unwilling to sign the informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mucosa recessionbaseline to 1-yearThe height of the crown was measured by a peridontal probe in mid-facial aspect. The difference of the height of the crown over time was calculated as mucosa recession

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
probing depthbaseline to 1-yearperi-implant probing depth detected by periodontal probe examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown
bleeding on probingbaseline to 1-yearpercentage of sites with bleeding on probing examined by a peridontal probe at six sites around the crown
Pink Esthetic Score (0-14)baseline to 1-yearSeven parameters were assessed:mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar process deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each parameter was scored as 2,1,0.
thickness of buccal bone platebaseline to 1-yearthe distance between the implant's facial contour and the outside surface of the buccal bone measured by cone beam computor tomograph.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026