Skip to content

Added Value of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation

Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography-CT/MRI Fusion Guidance for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Inconspicuous, Small Liver Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05445973
Enrollment
248
Registered
2022-07-06
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2022-01-30
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Tumors, Radiofrequency Ablation, Ultrasonography

Keywords

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation, Real-Time Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography, Small Liver Tumors

Brief summary

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS)-CT/MRI fusion imaging substantially improved the visibility of small tumors that were inconspicuous on both US and US-CT/MRI fusion imaging, contributing to successful percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.

Detailed description

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been widely implemented as a curative treatment for liver malignancies. The overall survival post-RFA is comparable to that of surgical outcomes for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) (≤ 3 cm). US guidance for RFA is common in Asia because the real-time capability of US allows precise electrode placement. However, precisely targeting small liver malignancies with poor sonographic conspicuity in US-guided RFA is often challenging. To solve this problem, CEUS or real-time fusion imaging (FI) of US and CT/MRI have been used. Both approaches have been reported to improve the confidence for tumor localization in RFA for small HCCs with poor B-mode US visibility. However, when an index tumor is entirely invisible on B-mode US, neither method is ideal, especially for multiple-electrode RFA, due to inherent registration errors on FI or insonation-induced bubble destruction on CEUS with SonoVue. Therefore, there is a clinical need to compensate for the inherent registration errors of US-CT/MRI FI for inconspicuous tumors on both US and US-CT/MRI FI. Recent studies reported that after adding CEUS using Sonazoid (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) or SonoVue to FI, 83.3% to 90% of target liver cancers that were initially difficult to visualize on FI became conspicuous, allowing them to be directly targeted for RFA. However, these studies had limitations, including a retrospective study design, a small sample size (\< 30 inconspicuous tumors), or a short-term follow-up (\< 1 year). Furthermore, no prospective study has explored the value of CEUS-CT/MRI FI, using both SonoVue and Sonazoid as contrast agents, for localizing index tumors and guiding RFA procedures in patients with inconspicuous tumors on B-mode US and reported its therapeutic impact on local tumor control. Therefore, the present study investigated whether CEUS-CT/MRI FI improved the visibility of small (≤ 3 cm) primary and secondary liver tumors that were invisible or difficult to visualize on B-mode US for percutaneous RFA.

Interventions

In brief, ablation was performed using a 200-W multichannel generator and a switching monopolar technique with separate clustered electrodes. Tumor targeting was done under the guidance of CEUS-CT/MRI FI, and the ablation procedure was monitored with US-FI. The ablation procedure was terminated when the operator expected to complete the ablation of the index tumor with a minimum 5-mm ablative margin on the US-FI images.

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* inconspicuous or invisible index tumors for ablation on US * tumor size ≤ 3 cm * pathologic diagnosis of primary or secondary liver malignancy or imaging-based diagnosis of HCC according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines or viable HCC according to the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm * consideration of curative-intent RFA

Exclusion criteria

* well-visible tumors (visibility score of 3 or 4) on the planning B-mode US * the absence of available data from multiphase CT or MRI performed in the 3-month pre-procedure period * poor quality registration of US-CT/MRI fusion imaging and RFA planned with palliative intent * contraindications for the conventional RFA procedure at the authors' institution, which are uncontrollable coagulopathy (platelet count \< 50,000/μL or international standard ratio ≥ 1.6), a low level of cooperation, impracticality of sedation, portal vein thrombus, the tumor abutting the portal vein, or larger bile ducts than the segmental branches

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Local tumor progression rate12 months after the radiofrequency ablationEvaluate local tumor progression by follow-up computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Technical success rate of radiofrequency ablation using contrast-enhanced US-CT/MRI fusion imageImmediately after radiofrequency ablationThe technical success of radiofrequency ablation is defined as complete ablation of tumor with safety margin and evaluated by immediate post-procedural computed tomography.

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026