Skip to content

Specific Screw Holes Locating Surgical Guide and Pre-bent Plates

Precision of Patient Specific Screw Holes Locating Surgical Guide and Pre-bent Plates Osteosynthesis Versus Classical Work-flow in Management of Class III Mandibular Fractures

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05444829
Enrollment
26
Registered
2022-07-06
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2023-09-30
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures

Keywords

class III

Brief summary

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-guided mandibular fracture reduction versus the classical work flow

Detailed description

Research question: Does the use of screw holes locating surgical guide & pre-bent plates osteosynthesis accurately reduce class III mandibular fractures regarding segments integrity and occlusion more than the classical reduction and fixation? Statement of the problem: Mandibular fractures are the most frequently occurring fractures within the maxillofacial injuries. The evaluation, diagnosis, and management of these fractures remain challenging despite improved imaging technology and fixation techniques. Depending on the type and location of the fractures, various open and closed surgical reduction techniques can be utilized. There are several critical and inherent limitations to the current ,standard approach of mandibular fracture reduction and fixation includes : (improper alignment of segments ,malocclusion ,nerve affections and related teeth roots injury). There is a possibility to overcome these limitations with the help of computer-guided surgery . The introduction of CAD/CAM software has provided surgeons with an opportunity to perform virtual manipulations of CT datasets preoperatively and production of corrected mandibular model for plate pre-bending and fabrication of plate locating surgical guide which provide accurate segment reduction and fixation with accurate post-operative occlusion and minimal post-operative complication . The aim of the current study was to evaluate the accuracy of computer-guided mandibular fracture reduction versus the conventional work flow Rationale for conducting the research: Through computer guided mandibular fracture reduction investigators can provide proper segment alignment with subsequent accurate post-operative occlusion in addition reduce intra-operative time , post-operative pain and edema

Interventions

DEVICEspecific screw holes locating surgical guide and pre-bent plates

Put the specific screw holes locating device in place and drill the screw holes, remove the screw holes locating device and mobilize the segments then apply the pre-bent plates and fix it with screw for passive reduction of the segments. Then suture the mentalis muscle then the mucosa.

DEVICEclassical reduction and internal fixation.

mobilize the broken segment first, Arch bar was made to achieve proper occlusion put the compression plate on the inferior border and remove it for further bending using plate pliers for further accommodation of the plate on the inferior border the fix it in place using compression and tension plate.

Sponsors

Abdallah Gaber Ali Mohamed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with delayed and isolated mandibular class III fracture needs open reduction and internal fixation. * Patients with medical history that did not hinder plate placement (uncontrolled diabetes) and adequate proper oral hygiene. * Both genders males and females will be included.

Exclusion criteria

* • General contraindications to surgery. * Patients with fresh fractures (mobile segments). * Patients with unfavourable nor comminuted fractures. * Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before fixation. * Untreated periodontitis. * Poor oral hygiene and motivation. * Uncontrolled diabetes. * Pregnant or nursing. * Substance abuse. * Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations. * Severe bruxism or clenching. * Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised. * Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates. * Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
computer tomographyafter 3 monthsthe Computer Tomography Will calculate the segments deviation in mm. after 3 month .

Contacts

Primary Contactabdallah gaber
abdallahgaber@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01155778958
Backup ContactHussein Hatem

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026