Skip to content

Carotid Ultrasounds Measurements in Septic Shock

Carotid Ultrasounds Measurements for Assessment of Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05444621
Enrollment
72
Registered
2022-07-06
Start date
2022-07-01
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2022-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Septic Shock

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to assess carotid ultrasounds measurements, namely corrected flow time (FTc), velocity time integral (VTI) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak), as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.

Detailed description

Sepsis is life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection . Early identification and appropriate management in the initial hours after the development of sepsis improve outcomes. For patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock it is recommended to give IV crystalloid fluid within the first 3 hr of resuscitation . However, fluid responsiveness varies widely between cases. Determining the optimal amount of fluid to be administered remains a critical issue in clinical practice and research. Recent studies have shown that not every patient advantages from intravenous hydration, only 40% of hypotensive patients with sepsis benefit, and the others who do not respond are liable to develop pulmonary edema with high associated mortality . Studies have shown that aortic blood peak velocity had high sensitivity and specificity to predict fluid responsiveness, however, measurements of aortic blood flow velocity need a transesophageal ultrasound which is an invasive procedure . Measurement of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOTVTI), derived stroke volume (SV), and cardiac output reliably predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients but it is difficult and dependent on operator and echo windows . There is a need to find a non-invasive accurate and easy method to assess fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients. Different Measurements of carotid artery flow have been suggested recently to predict fluid responsiveness. A promising measurements are corrected flow time (FTc), velocity time integral (VTI) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak).

Interventions

All patients are then assessed by transthoracic echocardiography to measure Left ventricle and Right ventricle function and to assess LVOT-VTI and SV. Doppler Ultrasound assessment of carotid arteries to assess corrected flow time (FTc), velocity time integral (VTI) and respirophasic variation in carotid artery blood flow peak velocity (ΔVpeak). The patient will be assessed pre- and post- passive leg raising (PLR) and after fluid challenge of 30 mL/Kg of IV crystalloid

Sponsors

Assiut University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients (18-75 year old) diagnosed with septic shock (MAP \>65mmHg), within 6 hours of admission or development of septic shock if previously admitted with other diagnoses.

Exclusion criteria

* patients have any of these conditions: Carotid artery stenosis ≥50%, known heart failure (Ejection fraction ≤45%) or End Stage Kidney Disease requiring haemodialysis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
carotid usltrasounds and doppler measurements as predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic patientbaselineAssess carotid artery blood flow assessed by Ultrasounds as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients, and compare this measurements to standard one as echocardiography measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output (COP)to establish more easier method for assessment not depend of echo-window of patient and doesn't need expert one to do.

Contacts

Primary ContactMohammed AM Hassan
mohammedelahmer88@gmail.com+2/01010706790
Backup ContactAhmed MA Obaidullah, asst. prof
ahmed.ali13@med.au.edu.eg+2/01007556396

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026