Skip to content

What Makes People Better at Describing Photographs?

What Makes People Better at Describing Photographs?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05444114
Enrollment
182
Registered
2022-07-05
Start date
2022-08-22
Completion date
2023-05-23
Last updated
2024-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Aging

Keywords

speech production, cognitive aging

Brief summary

This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the ability to provide verbal descriptions of photographs. Participants will perform a brief mental exercise, then see three photographs with instructions to describe each thoroughly. Participants will also complete several other surveys and measures. Collected data will give researchers a better understanding of how different variables relate to speech production.

Detailed description

This study is being conducted to learn more about how various personal and situational characteristics are related to the the ability to provide verbal descriptions of photographs. Adult participants ages 18-30 and 65-80 will participate in videoconference calls during which they perform a brief mental exercise, then see three photographs with instructions to describe each thoroughly. Descriptions are to be 30 to 60 seconds in length and are audio recorded for later scoring. Participants will also complete several other surveys and measures, including some about anxiety, mindfulness, vocabulary, and demographics. Participation will take approximately 40 to 60 minutes. Collected data will be de-identified, and the aggregate data will give researchers a better understanding of how individuals' personality and cognitive traits and the mental exercise performed before the study relate to peoples' speech production performance.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMental Exercise

Participants perform a 10 minute mental exercise that is either mindful breathing or listening to a story

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Colorado, Colorado Springs
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Participants in each condition do not know what other participants are doing, nor that there is another condition.

Intervention model description

Participants are randomly assigned to one of two conditions before performing a picture description task from which we measure speech fluency in several ways

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* fluent speakers of English * ages 18-30 or ages 65-80

Exclusion criteria

* non-fluent speakers of English * people who are not ages 18-30 or ages 65-80

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RepetitionsDuring the 40 to 60 minute experimental sessionAverage number of repetitions as a percentage of words spoken
Speech RateDuring the 40 to 60 minute experimental sessionAverage number of words per second spoken
Speech Fillers Mid-PhraseDuring the 40 to 60 minute experimental sessionAverage number of mid-phrase speech fillers as a percentage of words spoken
Speech Fillers OtherDuring the 40 to 60 minute experimental sessionAverage number of speech fillers not in the middle of a phrase as a percentage of words spoken
Repairs Plus False StartsDuring the 40 to 60 minute experimental sessionAverage number of repairs plus false starts as a percentage of words spoken. These two measures reflect the same underlying process so are summed together; indeed, one or the other term is sometimes used to indicate both measures.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Young adult participants were recruited via an online posting system (Sona) operated within the UCCS Psychology department. Older adult participants were recruiting via calls and emails to community members who have signed up as interested in participating via a UCCS website.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mindful Breathing Condition
Participants follow instructions on a 10-min audio clip Participants perform a 10 minute mindful breathing exercise
90
Control Condition
Participants follow instructions on a 10-min audio clip Participants listen to 10 minutes of a story
92
Total182

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMindful Breathing ConditionControl ConditionTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
44 Participants45 Participants89 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
46 Participants47 Participants93 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants9 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
68 Participants83 Participants151 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants5 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
69 Participants78 Participants147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants63 Participants129 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants29 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 900 / 92
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 900 / 92
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 900 / 92

Outcome results

Primary

Repairs Plus False Starts

Average number of repairs plus false starts as a percentage of words spoken. These two measures reflect the same underlying process so are summed together; indeed, one or the other term is sometimes used to indicate both measures.

Time frame: During the 40 to 60 minute experimental session

Population: 10 of the 182 tested participants' data were not analyzed (9 in mindful breathing and 1 in control condition) due to reporting ages outside our inclusion criterion (n = 2), reporting not being native English speakers (n = 3), excessive distraction during testing (n = 1), or equipment problems (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful Breathing ConditionRepairs Plus False Starts1.3 percentage of words with false startsStandard Deviation 0.9
Control ConditionRepairs Plus False Starts1.9 percentage of words with false startsStandard Deviation 1.1
Primary

Repetitions

Average number of repetitions as a percentage of words spoken

Time frame: During the 40 to 60 minute experimental session

Population: 10 of the 182 tested participants' data were not analyzed (9 in mindful breathing and 1 in control condition) due to reporting ages outside our inclusion criterion (n = 2), reporting not being native English speakers (n = 3), excessive distraction during testing (n = 1), or equipment problems (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful Breathing ConditionRepetitions1.0 percentage of words spoken with repeatsStandard Deviation 0.9
Control ConditionRepetitions1.4 percentage of words spoken with repeatsStandard Deviation 1
Primary

Speech Fillers Mid-Phrase

Average number of mid-phrase speech fillers as a percentage of words spoken

Time frame: During the 40 to 60 minute experimental session

Population: 10 of the 182 tested participants' data were not analyzed (9 in mindful breathing and 1 in control condition) due to reporting ages outside our inclusion criterion (n = 2), reporting not being native English speakers (n = 3), excessive distraction during testing (n = 1), or equipment problems (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful Breathing ConditionSpeech Fillers Mid-Phrase1.5 percentage of words spokenStandard Deviation 1.4
Control ConditionSpeech Fillers Mid-Phrase1.6 percentage of words spokenStandard Deviation 1.5
Primary

Speech Fillers Other

Average number of speech fillers not in the middle of a phrase as a percentage of words spoken

Time frame: During the 40 to 60 minute experimental session

Population: 10 of the 182 tested participants' data were not analyzed (9 in mindful breathing and 1 in control condition) due to reporting ages outside our inclusion criterion (n = 2), reporting not being native English speakers (n = 3), excessive distraction during testing (n = 1), or equipment problems (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful Breathing ConditionSpeech Fillers Other4.4 percentage of words with other fillersStandard Deviation 3
Control ConditionSpeech Fillers Other4.4 percentage of words with other fillersStandard Deviation 2.1
Primary

Speech Rate

Average number of words per second spoken

Time frame: During the 40 to 60 minute experimental session

Population: 10 of the 182 tested participants' data were not analyzed (9 in mindful breathing and 1 in control condition) due to reporting ages outside our inclusion criterion (n = 2), reporting not being native English speakers (n = 3), excessive distraction during testing (n = 1), or equipment problems (n = 4).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mindful Breathing ConditionSpeech Rate2.12 Words per SecondStandard Deviation 0.41
Control ConditionSpeech Rate2.20 Words per SecondStandard Deviation 0.35

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026