Skip to content

Adaptive Sports for Individuals With a Physical Disability : Effect Among Stroke Survivors

L'activitié Physique Sportive organisée Pour Sujets en Situation de Handicap : Impact Chez Les Sujets Post-accident Vasculaire cérébrale, Sur Les Trois Domaines de la Classification Internationale du Fonctionnement, du Handicap et de la santé (CIF)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05443529
Acronym
APSA-AVC
Enrollment
50
Registered
2022-07-05
Start date
2022-10-18
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-11-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Brief summary

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of engaging in adaptive sports for individuals who have had a stroke. The study is cross-sectional, participants with stroke will be recruited and divided into two groups: the first group composed of individuals with stroke who regularly participate in adaptive sports; and the second of individuals with stroke who do not regularly participate in adaptive sports. The two groups will have to be similar in terms of demographic variables (age, gender, time since beginning of stroke). A series of parameters will be tested, on one occasion for each participant. The two groups will then be compared to one another.

Interventions

Participation in community adaptive sports programs

Sponsors

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of stroke since at least 6 months prior to recruitment in the study * persistent physical disability due to the stroke * adequate understanding of french

Exclusion criteria

* significant cognitive impairments * contra-indication of any type to performing physical activity and physical exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional walkingbaselineMeasured through a 6 minute-walk test where participants walk back and forth from one cone to another (placed 30 meters away), during 6 minutes. The distance walked in the 6 minutes is calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical endurancebaselineMeasured through a sub-maximal effort test on cycle ergometer.
Motor impairmentbaselineMeasured by the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. The score ranges from 0-226, where lower scores represent greater motor impairment.
Upper and lower limb strengthbaselineMeasured using a manual dynamometer (microfet), in flexion, extension, adduction, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation of each limb.
Functional autonomybaselineMeasured using the Functional Independence Measure. Total scores range from 8 to 126 points. A lower score corresponds to complete dependence/no autonomy.
Functional walking capacitybaselineMeasured by the timed up and go test.
Functional walking speedbaselineMeasured by the 10 meter walk test.
Locomotion abilitybaselineMeasured by the Abiloco questionnaire. Score ranges from 0 to 13, where lower scores represent loss locomotion ability.
Social participationbaselineMeasured by the Return to normal living index, a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with a greater score for greater social participation.
Intensity of physical activity performed dailybaseline, during one weekMeasured by a heart rate monitor
BalancebaselineMeasured by the Activities-specific balance confidence scale. Scores range from 0 to 160, where higher score mean better confidence in balance.
Physical activity level (subjective)baselineMeasured by the Physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities. Scores range from 0 to 199.5 MET hour per day, where a greater score represents a greater level of physical activity.
Volume of physical activity performed dailybaseline, during one weekMeasured by an accelerometer.
FatiguebaselineMeasured by the fatigue severity scale. Scores range from 9 to 63 where a higher score represents greater fatigue severity.
Satisfaction with quality of lifebaselineMeasured by the EUROHIS-QOL (European Health Interview Survey, Quality of Life) 8 item questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 40, with a greater score representing a better quality of life.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Demographic variablesbaselineQuestionnaire asking participants to report age, gender, date of stroke, type of stroke as well as number of weekly sessions in any type of organised physical activity.
Medical and paramedical databaselineQuestionnaire asking participants to report any medication taken at the time of study participation, number of weekly sessions of physiotherapy and number of weekly sessions of other therapy.

Countries

Belgium

Contacts

Primary ContactLouise Declerck, PT
louise.declerck@uclouvain.be+32476480314
Backup ContactGaëtan Stoquart, MD
gaetan.stoquart@saintluc.uclouvain.be+3227641649

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026