Skip to content

Effect of Modulated Auditory Stimulation on Interaural Auditory Perception

Effect of an Equalizer-modulated Auditory Intervention on the Asymmetry of Interaural Auditory Perception in Groups of Different Emotional States

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05441891
Enrollment
233
Registered
2022-07-01
Start date
2022-06-17
Completion date
2022-10-21
Last updated
2022-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asymmetric Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Keywords

hearing asymmetry, mental disorders

Brief summary

This study analyzes the effect of an equalizer-modulated auditory intervention on the asymmetry of interaural auditory perception in groups with different emotional states such as well-being, anxiety, depression and mixed anxiety-depression.

Detailed description

The present study follows a randomized, double-blind (investigator and outcome assessor), parallel and controlled design. The auditory intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks). Participants assigned to the control group are cited to the Health centre, but they do not received any intervention. These subjects follow the same evaluation and data collection process. Once randomized, all participants will make a first control visit in which a pure-tone audiometry was carry out and completed the various psychiatric evaluation tests to classify into different groups: Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), and Sociodemographic variables (age, gender, nationality, education, working status, noise exposure, use of ear protection, and present or past use of any analgesic, anxiolytic or antidepressant for longer than a week). The study variables collected at 3 months were pure-tone audiometry (air conduction).

Interventions

OTHERAuditory intervention filter-modulated group

Intervention consisted of listening to classical music modulated by an equalizer for 30 minutes, 2 sessions a day separated by at least 3 hours, for 10 days (Monday to Friday for 2 weeks). The musical intervention was always performed with the same songs and in the same order using original CDs, heard through headphones (Beyerdynamic, DT 250 / 80 ohm. GMBH & Co. KG, Theresienstr. 8 D-74072 Heilbronn, Germany). The music was played with a sound system (Panasonic MASH, No. SA-PM24. Hamburg, Germany). and filtered through an equalizer called Earducator (Hollagen Designs, PÍO. Box 43 7864 Bergvliet W.Cape - South Africa) that modulates music by alternating low and high tones with an unpredictable cadence, preventing habituation. It also allows very narrow band complementary filters to attenuate (by about 40 dB) abnormally perceived frequencies (hyper-hearing peaks): filters in: 1 kHz - 1,5 kHz - 2kHz - 3 kHz - 4 kHz - 8kHz.

Sponsors

University of Alcala
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants not received any intervention. The researchers in charge of outcome assessment and statistical analysis are blinded to the allocation of participants

Intervention model description

Randomized, parallel, pre-post study design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
31 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Recruited from Health Centre Mejorada del Campo (Madrid, Spain)

Exclusion criteria

* Having significant hearing loss * Having acute otological process * Having psychotic disease * Having epilepsy * Having serious illness * Having pregnancy * Used to try alcohol or drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Depression level on the Hamilton scaleOne monthEach item is rated on a three- or five-point scale, with a score from 0 to 2 or 0 to 4, respectively. It yields a total score in the range of 0 to 52. The following cut-off points were used to assess depression: No depression: 0-7; Depression: \>7
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 750 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 750 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 1500 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 1500 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 2000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 2000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 3000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 3000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 4000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 4000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 8000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 8000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 6000 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 6000 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Anxiety and depression level on the Goldberg scaleOne monthTo discriminate between these two entities. The following cut-off points were used: a total Anxiety score \> 4 detects 73% of all cases of anxiety; a total Depression score \>3 detects 82% of all cases of depression
Anxiety level on the Hamilton scaleOne monthIt is a clinician-administered scale on which each item is rated from 0 to 4. It yields a score in the range of 0 to 56. The following cut-off points were used: 0-5 points (No anxiety), \>5 points (Anxiety).
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 125 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 125 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry
Change from Baseline hearing threshold at a frequency of 250 Hz in an air conduction pure tone audiometry at three monthsChange from Baseline hearing threshold at 3 monthsMinimum number of decibels needed to hear a sound at a frequency of 250 Hz measured in an air conduction pure tone audiometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 250 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 500 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 750 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1000 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 1500 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 2000 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 3000 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 4000 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 6000 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 8000 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.
Relationship between the auditory threshold of the right and left ear at the frequency of 125 HzThree months between the first and second measureRatio of the threshold of one ear to that of the other. If both have the same threshold, the result is zero.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026