Skip to content

A Novel Cooling Vest to Protect Persons With SCI From Hyperthermia

Development of a Novel Cooling Vest to Prevent Heat-Induced Thermoregulatory Dysfunction in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05441449
Enrollment
15
Registered
2022-07-01
Start date
2023-12-18
Completion date
2025-01-31
Last updated
2025-04-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Keywords

Body Temperature Regulation, Hyperthermia, Body Temperature

Brief summary

Persons with higher levels of spinal cord injury (above the 6th thoracic vertebrae: Hi-SCI) are unable to maintain their core body temperature (Tcore) within the normal range (97.5-99.7 °F) when exposed to warm environments. Even limited exposure to warm temperatures can cause hyperthermia (Tcore 100.4°F) in Hi-SCI. Mild hyperthermia causes discomfort and impaired thinking, but if unchecked, can lead to permanent damage to the brain, multiple body organ failure, and death. Warm seasonal temperatures have an adverse effect on personal comfort and the ability to participate in daily social activities in persons with Hi-SCI. Interventions addressing this vulnerability to hyperthermia are limited. A self-regulating smart cooling vest designed for persons with Hi-SCI, that can effectively dissipate body heat, is a novel and promising strategy to address this problem. Once the current prototype is further developed and bench-tested, the investigators will test the vest in able-bodied participants for safety and comfort. The investigators will then test the vest in participants with Hi-SCI for efficacy. The aim for the cooling vest to minimize the expected increase of 1.1°F in Tcore by at least 50 percent and increase thermal comfort, during a controlled exposure to heat (95°F). If successful, the vest will provide a promising intervention to decrease the adverse impact of warm temperatures on comfort, quality of life, and participation in societal functions for Veterans with Hi-SCI during the warmer seasons.

Detailed description

Problem Statement: Loss of supraspinal control of autonomic pathways interrupts homeostasis of multiple organ systems including thermoregulation. Thermoregulatory mechanisms are dysfunctional due to interrupted sympathetic pathways for hypothalamic control of vasomotor and sudomotor function and motor/sensory pathways for shivering and thermal sensation. During exposure to warm seasonal temperatures, dysregulation of heat dissipating mechanisms (vasodilation and sweating) allows core body temperature (Tcore) to rise in persons with SCI rather than remaining stable and tightly regulated (\ 37°0.6°C), as occurs in able-bodied (AB) persons. The investigators have reported in persons with higher lesions (SCI \>T6: Hi-SCI), that even limited exposure (1-2 hours) to typical summer temperatures (35°C) can result in Tcore rising to values approaching hyperthermia ( 38°C). Mild hyperthermia causes physical discomfort and can impair cognition. Unchecked, hyperthermia can progress to heat exhaustion and heat stroke causing seizures, loss of consciousness, and potentially death, as occurred in vulnerable residents of the Pacific Northwest during a heat wave in late June 2021. Current medical advice for those with SCI is to avoid direct sunlight, dress sparingly, drink plenty of fluids, and stay indoors on hot, humid days. Despite heeding this advice, persons with SCI frequently find themselves in hot environments for prolonged periods during social, religious, or work functions. During these conditions, there is rapid progression to feeling overheated and an increased risk for heat-related illness. Warm seasonal temperatures limit perceived comfort, performance of activities, and participation in societal functions to a greater extent in persons with cervical injury (tetraplegia) than in AB controls. Identifying a safe, non-invasive, efficacious bioengineering intervention to restore thermoregulatory function during heat exposure has the potential to minimize the negative impact of heat on activities, participation, and quality of life (QOL) in Veterans with SCI. If efficacious, other Veteran populations adversely affected by heat exposure may also benefit from this intervention. Goals: This pilot study will develop and test a self-regulating cooling vest for Veterans with SCI that can utilize both conductive and evaporative methods to dissipate body heat as a proof-of-concept to prevent an excessive rise in Tcore and thermal discomfort during controlled exposure to a warm environment. An initial prototype of the vest has been developed in collaboration with Dr. Hao Su, a Co-Investigator. This initial prototype requires further development prior to human subject testing. If this study is successful, the investigators will collaborate with the Human Engineering Research Laboratory (HERL) to make the vest appropriate for home testing to determine its effectiveness in improving societal participation and QOL in Veterans with SCI during warmer seasons or when residing in or traveling to hot climate zones. Primary Objective (Safety): To complete development of the 2nd prototype of the cooling vest and determine its safety. After satisfying bench testing criteria, AB participants will wear the wet cooling vest at maximal settings for 2 hours in the seated position in a warm thermal chamber (35°C), to determine: (1) minimum skin temperatures beneath the cooling vest and (2) subjective comfort of the cooling vest. Primary Hypotheses: (1) Skin temperatures beneath the vest will be 20°C to protect against cold injury. (2) AB participants will report a thermal sensation (TS) no less than cool on a validated 9-point thermal sensation scale. If during testing, a skin temperature of \<20°C is measured or a TS \< cool, or cold spots are reported, vest development will continue to ensure that the prototype is safe for testing in persons with SCI. Once safety criteria for the cooling vest are met in AB subjects, efficacy testing will be performed in persons with SCI who will wear the cooling vest during a controlled warm challenge. Secondary Objective (Efficacy in SCI): To determine the efficacy of the wet cooling vest to maintain Tcore (within 0.3°C) in participants with Hi-SCI when exposed to 2 hours of a warm environment. Using a repeated measures design, participants with Hi-SCI will wear the wet vest (experimental condition) or no vest (control condition) in a warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours in the seated position, to determine: (1) change in Tcore and (2) perception of heat and thermal comfort. Secondary Hypotheses: In the investigators' previous investigation of heat exposure, 65% of persons with Hi-SCI had increases of \>0.5°C in Tcore (mean increase 0.6°0.3°C) while wearing only shorts. The investigators expect that wearing a cooling vest during the same heat exposure, will significantly increase heat dissipation and, thus, enhance maintenance of Tcore and thermal comfort. The investigators hypothesize that during a controlled warm exposure (35°C), participants with Hi-SCI wearing the wet cooling vest compared to the same participants not wearing a vest: 1) 65% will have a significantly reduced elevation in Tcore ( 0.3°C), and 2) a greater percentage of participants will report increased thermal comfort (decreased perception of feeling hot, very hot, or uncomfortable).

Interventions

A self-regulating cooling vest for persons with SCI that can utilize both conductive and evaporative methods to dissipate body heat as a proof-of-concept to prevent an excessive rise in Tcore and thermal discomfort during a controlled exposure to a warm environment. The vest is an article of clothing, is made of commercially-available wicking material, which once saturated with water, uses evaporation to dissipate heat. Channels embedded in the vest supply cooled water to keep the wet vest cool. The cooling capacity of the vest is regulated by a microprocessor which continuously receives feedback from the user's skin and core temperature. The vest is non-invasive and supplies no energy to the user.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

After the cooling vest has been fully bench-tested, two phases (AB safety; SCI efficacy) will be performed. Phase 1 (Safety): Descriptive design: because persons with SCI have impaired sensation, one group of able-bodied (AB) participants will wear the wet smart cooling vest during a heat challenge (sitting in a warm room) to determine its safety. Phase 2 (Efficacy): 1 x 2 Repeated Measures design: one group of persons with Hi-SCI will undergo 2 heat challenges (sitting in a warm room) under 2 conditions (experimental: wet vest, control: no vest) in random order to determine efficacy of the cooling vest in maintaining Tcore and thermal comfort..

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 68 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Spinal cord injury (SCI) \>1 year in duration * Level of SCI C4-T2, ASIA Impairment Scale A & B * Gender and age-matched (±5 years) able-bodied (AB) controls * Euhydration (participants will be instructed to avoid caffeine and alcohol, maintain normal salt and water intake and avoid strenuous exercise for 24 hours prior to study)

Exclusion criteria

* Known cardiovascular, kidney or untreated thyroid disease * Traumatic brain injury (mod-severe) * Diabetes mellitus * Acute illness or infection * Broken, inflamed, or otherwise fragile skin * Pregnancy * BMI \>30 kg/m2 * Smoking Participants with SCI only (secondary to telemetry capsule (CorTemp®) measurement of Tcore) * Undergoing magnetic resonance imaging while the telemetry capsule is within the body (2-5 days) * Cardiac pacemaker or other implanted electromedical device * Known or suspected obstructive disease of the GI tract

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skin Temperature (Tsk) ChangeBaseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be comparedTsk will be monitored using TX-4 Skin Surface probes and Iso-Thermex Multichannel Thermometer (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Skin thermocouples will be taped to 12 sites on the trunk (chest/abdomen) of AB controls (6 on each side) and on 10 sites on the chest/abdomen (5 on each side) and 4 sites on the bilateral hands and feet (2 on each side) for a total of 14 sites on persons with Hi-SCI determine change and minimum skin temperatures beneath the cooling vest
Thermal Sensation (TS) ChangeBaseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be comparedTS will be measured by a 9-point (+4 to -4) thermal sensation scale (+4 Very Hot. +3 Hot, +2 Warm, +1 Slightly Warm, 0 Neutral, -1 Slightly Cool, -2 Cool, -3 Cold, -4 Very Cold). During a thermal challenge, a subjective score of 0 (Neutral) would be preferred as it indicates thermoregulatory mechanisms are effective for the participant.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Core Body Temperature (Tcore) ChangeBaseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be compared in persons with Hi-SCITcore: A disposable forehead skin temperature sensor (Bair HuggerTM Spot OnTM Temperature Monitoring System, 3M, Maplewood, Minnesota) will be placed on the frontal bone above the eyebrow on whatever side is most comfortable for the participant in order to measure core temperature (Tcore) in persons with Hi-SCI only. Less of an increase in Tcore is considered desirable during the thermal challenge.
Thermal Comfort (TC) ChangeBaseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be compared in persons with Hi-SCITC will be measured by a 6-point thermal comfort scale (+3 Very Comfortable, +2 Comfortable, +1 Just Comfortable, -1 Just Uncomfortable, -2 Uncomfortable, -3 Very Uncomfortable). Scores of +1, +2, and +3 scores are considered more desirable than -1, -2, and -3 scores during the thermal challenge.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1: Able-bodied (AB) Cooling Vest Testing
Phase 1: After satisfying bench testing criteria, AB participants will wear the wet cooling vest at maximal settings for 2 hours in the seated position in a warm thermal chamber (35°C), to determine: (1) minimum skin temperatures beneath the cooling vest and (2) subjective thermal sensation of their skin beneath the cooling vest. Cooling Vest: A self-regulating cooling vest for persons with SCI that can utilize both conductive and evaporative methods to dissipate body heat as a proof-of-concept to prevent an excessive rise in Tcore and thermal discomfort during a controlled exposure to a warm environment. The vest is an article of clothing, is made of commercially-available wicking material, which once saturated with water, uses evaporation to dissipate heat. Channels embedded in the vest supply cooled water to keep the wet vest cool. The cooling capacity of the vest is regulated by a microprocessor which continuously receives feedback from the user's skin and core temperature. The vest is non-invasive and supplies no energy to the user.
5
Arm 2: Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) No Vest Day, Then Cooling Vest Day
Phase 2: Participants with Hi-SCI will wear no vest (control condition) in a warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours in the seated position to determine (1) change in Tcore and (2) perception of heat and thermal comfort. Participants with Hi-SCI will then wear the wet vest on a separate day (experimental condition) in a warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours in the seated position to determine (1) change in Tcore and (2) perception of heat and thermal comfort. Cooling Vest: A self-regulating cooling vest for persons with SCI that can utilize both conductive and evaporative methods to dissipate body heat as a proof-of-concept to prevent an excessive rise in Tcore and thermal discomfort during a controlled exposure to a warm environment. The vest is an article of clothing, is made of commercially-available wicking material, which once saturated with water, uses evaporation to dissipate heat. Channels embedded in the vest supply cooled water to keep the wet vest cool. The cooling capacity of the vest is regulated by a microprocessor which continuously receives feedback from the user's skin and core temperature. The vest is non-invasive and supplies no energy to the user.
10
Total15

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1: Able-bodied (AB) Cooling Vest TestingArm 2: Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) No Vest Day, Then Cooling Vest DayTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Age, Continuous37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.5
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.2
40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.1
Body Mass Index (BMI)25 kg/(m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
21 kg/(m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
23 kg/(m^2)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 Participants10 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants10 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 51 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Skin Temperature (Tsk) Change

Tsk will be monitored using TX-4 Skin Surface probes and Iso-Thermex Multichannel Thermometer (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH). Skin thermocouples will be taped to 12 sites on the trunk (chest/abdomen) of AB controls (6 on each side) and on 10 sites on the chest/abdomen (5 on each side) and 4 sites on the bilateral hands and feet (2 on each side) for a total of 14 sites on persons with Hi-SCI determine change and minimum skin temperatures beneath the cooling vest

Time frame: Baseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be compared

Population: Within-group differences in the change for the average of all Skin Temperature (Tsk) from Baseline to post warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours were analyzed using a Repeated Measures ANOVA.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Cooling VestSkin Temperature (Tsk) Change-5.6 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 1.2
Arm 2: Cooling VestSkin Temperature (Tsk) Change-6.9 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 2.7
Arm 3: No VestSkin Temperature (Tsk) Change2.1 Degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 1.1
p-value: 0.002ANOVA
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Primary

Thermal Sensation (TS) Change

TS will be measured by a 9-point (+4 to -4) thermal sensation scale (+4 Very Hot. +3 Hot, +2 Warm, +1 Slightly Warm, 0 Neutral, -1 Slightly Cool, -2 Cool, -3 Cold, -4 Very Cold). During a thermal challenge, a subjective score of 0 (Neutral) would be preferred as it indicates thermoregulatory mechanisms are effective for the participant.

Time frame: Baseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be compared

Population: Within-group differences in the change for the Thermal Sensation from Baseline to post warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours were analyzed using a Repeated Measures ANOVA.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Cooling VestThermal Sensation (TS) Change-2.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Arm 2: Cooling VestThermal Sensation (TS) Change0.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Arm 3: No VestThermal Sensation (TS) Change2.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
p-value: 0.043ANOVA
p-value: 0.281ANOVA
p-value: <0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Core Body Temperature (Tcore) Change

Tcore: A disposable forehead skin temperature sensor (Bair HuggerTM Spot OnTM Temperature Monitoring System, 3M, Maplewood, Minnesota) will be placed on the frontal bone above the eyebrow on whatever side is most comfortable for the participant in order to measure core temperature (Tcore) in persons with Hi-SCI only. Less of an increase in Tcore is considered desirable during the thermal challenge.

Time frame: Baseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be compared in persons with Hi-SCI

Population: Within-group differences in the change of core temperature (Tcore) from Baseline to post warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours were analyzed using a Repeated Measures ANOVA.~Note: Tcore assessment was pre-specified to be collected only from participants with Hi-SCI. Therefore, these data were not collected from able-bodied participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 2: Cooling VestCore Body Temperature (Tcore) Change-0.1 degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.4
Arm 3: No VestCore Body Temperature (Tcore) Change0.8 degrees CelsiusStandard Deviation 0.4
p-value: 0.352ANOVA
p-value: 0.001ANOVA
Secondary

Thermal Comfort (TC) Change

TC will be measured by a 6-point thermal comfort scale (+3 Very Comfortable, +2 Comfortable, +1 Just Comfortable, -1 Just Uncomfortable, -2 Uncomfortable, -3 Very Uncomfortable). Scores of +1, +2, and +3 scores are considered more desirable than -1, -2, and -3 scores during the thermal challenge.

Time frame: Baseline (0 min) and end of thermal challenge (120 min) will be compared in persons with Hi-SCI

Population: Within-group differences in the change of Thermal Comfort from Baseline to post warm thermal chamber (35°C) for up to 2 hours were analyzed using a Repeated Measures ANOVA.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Cooling VestThermal Comfort (TC) Change0.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Arm 2: Cooling VestThermal Comfort (TC) Change0.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Arm 3: No VestThermal Comfort (TC) Change0.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
p-value: 0.374ANOVA
p-value: 0.045ANOVA
p-value: 0.196ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026