Skip to content

Comparison of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality With Mirror Therapy in Improving Motor Function of Upper Limb of Stroke Patients

Comparison of Effectiveness of Virtual Reality With Mirror Therapy in Improving Motor Function of Upper Limb of Stroke Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05441228
Enrollment
32
Registered
2022-07-01
Start date
2022-04-04
Completion date
2022-07-20
Last updated
2022-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Keywords

virtual reallity, Mirror therapy

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of virtual reality and mirror therapy in stroke patients. Different studies has been done to find out the best therapy for stroke patients. Use of virtual reality in medical field is becoming more popular now-a-days. Different devices and applications are available to treat various conditions. Research has been done to find the clinical applications of virtual reality for upper limb motor rehabilitation in stroke. in another study, mirror therapy with bilateral arm training was used for hemiplegic upper extremity motor functions in patients with chronic stroke. After doing literature review, it was found that no research has been done to compare the effectiveness of mirror therapy with virtual reality in improving motor function of upper limb of stroke patients. So, In this study these two therapies are compared. For virtual reality Oculus Quest 2 has been used. Patients were allowed to use beat saber game on Oculus.

Interventions

Oculus Quest 2 is virtual reality headset with 2 hand control remotes. Beat Saber application will be used on Oculus Quest 2.

DEVICEMirror therapy box

Mirror therapy is provided by mirror therapy box by placing it in sagittal plane of patient.

Sponsors

Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The participant are divided into two groups. The group a received virtual reality and group b received mirror therapy.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Stroke affecting upper limb

Exclusion criteria

* mental problem cognitive problem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl- Meyer Upper extremity scale4 weeksUsed to assess motor function of upper limb
Action arm research test4 weeksTo check motor activity of upper limb
Wolf motor function4 weeksTo identify motor activity of upper limb

Countries

Pakistan

Contacts

Primary ContactShafaq Altaf, Phd*
shafaq_dpt.ahs@stmu.edu.pk03435020507
Backup ContactNouman Khan, MS-OMPT
nouman_drs.ahs@stmu.edu.pk03339378324

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026