Skip to content

Effectiveness of Manual Therapy in Non-specific Low Back Pain

Effectiveness of Dry Needling VS Ischaemic Compression on Latent Myofascial Myofascial Trigger Points in the Gluteus Medius in Patients With Patients With Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Randomised Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05440253
Enrollment
80
Registered
2022-06-30
Start date
2022-04-01
Completion date
2022-06-24
Last updated
2022-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physiotherapy Specialty, Low Back Pain

Keywords

dry needling, low back pain, physiotherapy specialty, pain

Brief summary

Low back pain affects many people and involves high medical costs. For this reason, we wish to test the efficacy of dry needling VS ischaemic compression in patients with non-specific low back pain. To this end, an investigation was carried out on 40 patients diagnosed with this ailment, divided into two groups by randomisation to assess the intensity of pain, range of movement, pain threshold to pressure and quality of life, measuring these variables prior to the intervention, immediately, at 48 hours and one week after the intervention.

Interventions

DEVICEdry needling

Dry needling of the trigger point of the gluteus medius in patients diagnosed with non-specific low back pain.

Ischaemic trigger point compression of the gluteus medius in patients diagnosed with non-specific low back pain.

Sponsors

Universidad Católica de Ávila
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed informed consent form. * Presence of non-specific low back pain for more than six weeks. * Presence of a palpable tight band nodule in the gluteus medius muscle. * Presence of a hypersensitive or hyperirritable point in the tight band. * Patients reporting local or referred pain in the area of the latent MGP after mechanical stimulation mechanical stimulation.

Exclusion criteria

* Surgeries in the lumbopelvic region. * Diagnosis of herniated discs in the lumbar region. * Positive cognitive screening according to the Pfeiffer questionnaire. * Heterometrics. * Age outside the range of 18 to 75 years. * Ingested or injected anticoagulant or antiplatelet drugs. * Systemic or local infection in the lumbar region. * Pregnancy. * Presence of fear of needles (belonephobia).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain1 weekVisual Scale Analogue (0 minimum, 10 maximum).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
movement1 weekSchober test (0 minimum, 45 maximun).
quality of life1 weekOswestry low back pain disability scale (0 minimum, 100% maximum; Between 0-20% minimal limitation or disability, 21-40% moderate limitation or disability, 41- 60% severe limitation or disability, 61-80% disabled and above 81% limitation or disability. 60% severe limitation or disability, 61-80% disabled and above 81% maximum functional limitation or disability, 61-80% disabled and above 81% maximum functional limitation or disability. maximum functional limitation).

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026