Skip to content

A Multicentre Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream in Patients With Eczema

A Multicentre, Prospective and Registry Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Mucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream in the Treatment of Patients With Eczema

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05439577
Enrollment
1800
Registered
2022-06-30
Start date
2021-09-23
Completion date
2022-11-30
Last updated
2022-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eczema

Brief summary

The study was designed to collect information over 1800 patients with a clinical diagnosis of subacute or chronic eczema, these patients' prescriptions contain Hirudoid®. EASI, IGA and more indicators are evaluated. Data were collected for a maximum of 12 weeks according to the clinician's consultation and follow-up (Time points were set at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekends). The above data were analysed to explore the optimal treatment modality, dose and treatment period for patients with subacute or chronic eczema.

Detailed description

The study was designed to collect information over 1800 patients with a clinical diagnosis of subacute or chronic eczema, these patients' prescriptions contain Hirudoid® (Hirudoid® alone or in combination with glucocorticoids). Basic demographic information (age, sex, height, weight, lifestyle, occupation), vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, etc.), past medical and treatment history, eczema area and severity index (EASI) scores and corresponding symptom scores, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, Investigator's global assessment (IGA) of disease severity score, Visual analogue scale (VAS) with subject's pruritus, photographs of the eczema area and recurrence rate were collected. Data were evaluated for a maximum of 12 weeks according to the clinician's consultation and follow-up (Time points were set at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekends). The above data were analysed to explore the optimal treatment modality, dose and treatment period for patients with subacute or chronic eczema.

Interventions

DRUGMucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream

Patients using Hirudoid® alone

DRUGMucopolysaccharide Polysulfate Cream and glucocorticoids

Patients using Hirudoid® and glucocorticoids (Combination therapy, but not always)

Sponsors

Beijing Friendship Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
LanZhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Xingtai People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Boai Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Guangxi Ruikang Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
CollaboratorOTHER
Wuxi People's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Shenzhen Kangzhe Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-75 years of age, male or female;. 2. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of subacute or chronic eczema and whose prescription contains Hirudoid®. 3. Subjects fully understand the content of this study, sign informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Hypersensitivity to any of the ingredients of this product. 2. Patients with heparin hypersensitivity, bleeding-prone constitution and known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. 3. Open wounds and broken skin and mucous membranes 4. Patients with localized combined bacterial, viral and fungal infections. 5. Pregnant or lactating women or those who are unable to use contraception during the study period 6. Those with psychiatric disorders, poor compliance and unable to complete the study. 7. Any other reason that the investigator considers inappropriate for inclusion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
EASI scoreIt could be any time point in the weekend of 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12The greatest change in EASI score occurred during the 12 weeks (follow up point were set at baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekends) after dosing compared to baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual analogue scale (VAS) scoreBaseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekendsThe degree of improvement in the subject's self-assessment of visual analogue scale (VAS) compared with that at baseline. The Visual analogue scale (VAS) score was included 11 levels, the minimum value is zero, which means no pruritus; the maximum value is 10, which means extreme pruritus.
The investigator's global assessment (IGA) scoreBaseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekendsThe investigator's global assessment (IGA) of disease severity compared to that at baseline. The investigator's global assessment (IGA) score was included 5 levels, the minimum value is zero, which means no eczema-like lesions; the maximum value is 4, which means extremely severe eczema-like lesions.
Clinical manifestations. Including Erythema, Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling), Scratching (excoriation), Lichenification (lined skin, furrowing, prurigo nodules).Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekendsThe change in clinical manifestations during treatment compared with at baseline: including Erythema, Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling), Scratching (excoriation), Lichenification (lined skin, furrowing, prurigo nodules). Score 0 = no skin lesions, Score 1 = mild, requiring close observation to be seen, Score 2 = moderate, signs visible, Score 3 = severe, signs very visible.
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score.Baseline, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekendsThe Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score was included 10 questions, each question contains 4 levels, serious (3 score), moderate (2 score), mild (1 score), none or uncorrelated (0 score), respectively. Higher scores indicate greater troubles and annoyances on dermatology life quality from eczema.
Adverse event1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12 weekendsAdverse event/serious adverse event was evaluated.
Recurrence rate.8 and 12 weekends(Recurrence follow-up on the 8th and 12th weekends is only for patients who have recovered within 4 weeks. Recurrence rate = number of recurrences / number of recovered persons \* 100%); Definition of recovery: Subjects with an IGA score of 0 or 1 during the treatment period (within the first 4 weeks). Definition of relapse: A recovered patient with an IGA score ≥ 2 at follow-up was judged to be recurred.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLingfeng Li
zoonli@sina.com010-63138585
Backup ContactYue Li
13661202501@163.com13661202501

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026