Skip to content

Optimizing Protein Patterns for Skeletal Muscle Preservation and Sleep in the Medical Management of Parkinson Disease

Optimizing Protein Patterns for Skeletal Muscle Preservation and Sleep in the Medical Management of Parkinson Disease

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05437640
Enrollment
12
Registered
2022-06-29
Start date
2022-10-01
Completion date
2024-11-25
Last updated
2026-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

Parkinson Disease, Diet, Protein, Skeletal Muscle, Sleep

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot study is to generate preliminary data on the impact of the dietary protein pattern on markers of skeletal muscle health and drug efficacy in Parkinson disease.

Detailed description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurological disease that affects \ 6.1 million people worldwide - mostly older adults \>60 years. The most effective treatment for PD is dopaminergic therapy, particularly levodopa (Ldopa). People with PD have variable responses to Ldopa, including degrees of motor fluctuations (MF) throughout the day. The half-life of Ldopa is \ 1.5 h and therefore, dosage and timing are essential to mitigate MF. Ldopa is a large neutral amino acid (LNAA), and the bioavailability of Ldopa is compromised when simultaneously ingested with LNAA (e.g., leucine). Both Ldopa and LNAAs from food are absorbed through the same intestinal transporter, but LNAAs from food are preferentially absorbed by the enterocyte, limiting the bioavailability of Ldopa. Thus, the scientific community often recommends the protein-redistribution diet (PRD). With PRD, patients limit protein (\<10 g) at the desired time of medication efficacy (daytime) and meet their protein needs during the evening meal (\ 70+g). There are deleterious implications of the PRD for older adults with PD; consumption of \>30 g of protein, in a single meal, will not sufficiently increase muscle protein synthesis. Additionally, the impact of the PRD on skeletal muscle quality and function has not been determined, and it is unclear, based on prior studies, whether the PRD enhanced drug absorption. Therefore, the objective of this study is to address these gaps in knowledge. This study will quantify the effects of dietary protein pattern on skeletal muscle in PD; determine the effects of dietary protein pattern on sleep quality in PD. This study is an acute, 5-week, crossover intervention with PD participants randomly assigned to first adhere to either the PCD or PRD. Participants will receive diet prescriptions and meal plans for their respective diet, and outcome measures will be assessed at days 0, 14, 21, and 35.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProtein Redistribution Diet

PD participants will be instructed by a Registered Dietitian to consume 10 grams or less of protein until their evening meal. They will then consume a high protein evening meal to meet their protein needs. They will receive one-on-one education and supportive materials to follow diet plan.

BEHAVIORALProtein Consistent Diet

PD participants will be instructed by a Registered Dietitian to consume 20-30 grams of protein per meal. They will receive one-on-one education and supportive materials to follow diet plan.

Sponsors

University of Alabama at Birmingham
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Interpretation of blood biomarkers will be blinded to the intervention assignment.

Intervention model description

PD participants randomly assigned to first adhere to either the Protein Consistent Diet or Protein Redistribution Diet for 2 weeks. Participants will enter a 1-week washout period between the diets where they follow their typical diet and then follow the other diet prescription for 2 weeks.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD for 5 or more years * 45 years or older * On a stable levodopa regimen for 3 or more months * Self-reported to experience motor fluctuations

Exclusion criteria

* Following a specific diet that would preclude participation * Renal disease * Deep brain stimulation * Known narcolepsy * Untreated sleep apnea * Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, will preclude the participant from successfully or safely completing study procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Markers of Skeletal Muscle Metabolism GDF15Baseline to 5 weeksSerum Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15)
Change in Markers of Skeletal Muscle Metabolism FGF21Baseline to 5 weeksSerum Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21)
Change in Handgrip StrengthBaseline to 5 weeksHandgrip strength assessed via digital dynamometer
Change in Sleep EfficiencyBaseline to 5 weeksSleep efficiency assessed via actigraphy
Change in Motor SymptomsBaseline to 5 weeksMotor symptoms assessed via the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II. Part II ranges from 0-52 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Physical ActivityBaseline to 5 weeksPhysical activity assessed via actigraphy
Change in Total Parkinson SymptomsBaseline to 5 weeks. Total score ranges from 0-260 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.Parkinson-related symptoms assessed by total MDS-UPDRS score

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChristine C Ferguson, PhD

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Total Participants
All participants were scheduled to follow both dietary interventions. One participant withdrew during the washout phase. Enrolled n=12, final n=11
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotal Participants
Age, Continuous65 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 120 / 12
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 120 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Handgrip Strength

Handgrip strength assessed via digital dynamometer

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks

Primary

Change in Markers of Skeletal Muscle Metabolism FGF21

Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21)

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks

Primary

Change in Markers of Skeletal Muscle Metabolism GDF15

Serum Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF15)

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks

Primary

Change in Motor Symptoms

Motor symptoms assessed via the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part II. Part II ranges from 0-52 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protein Redistribution DietChange in Motor SymptomsBaseline11.27 ScoreStandard Deviation 5.57
Protein Redistribution DietChange in Motor SymptomsPost-Diet9.45 ScoreStandard Deviation 5.97
Protein Consistent DietChange in Motor SymptomsBaseline9.58 ScoreStandard Deviation 7.75
Protein Consistent DietChange in Motor SymptomsPost-Diet9.42 ScoreStandard Deviation 4.94
Primary

Change in Sleep Efficiency

Sleep efficiency assessed via actigraphy

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks

Secondary

Change in Physical Activity

Physical activity assessed via actigraphy

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks

Secondary

Change in Total Parkinson Symptoms

Parkinson-related symptoms assessed by total MDS-UPDRS score

Time frame: Baseline to 5 weeks. Total score ranges from 0-260 with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Protein Redistribution DietChange in Total Parkinson SymptomsBaseline52.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.92
Protein Redistribution DietChange in Total Parkinson SymptomsPost-Diet47.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.15
Protein Consistent DietChange in Total Parkinson SymptomsBaseline51.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.04
Protein Consistent DietChange in Total Parkinson SymptomsPost-Diet48.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.52

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 23, 2026