Skip to content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Digital, Self-testing Strategy for COVID-19 Infection in South Africa.

Evaluation of the Impact of a Digital Self-testing Strategy in Individuals With Suspected COVID-19 Infection in South Africa on Time to Action Plans, Linkage to Care, Detection of New Infections: A Randomized Controlled Superiority Trial.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05436795
Enrollment
600
Registered
2022-06-29
Start date
2023-02-02
Completion date
2024-03-31
Last updated
2023-10-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COVID-19

Keywords

COVID-19, self-test, self-sample, point-of-care, randomized controlled trial, rapid test, digital, app-based, SARS-CoV-2

Brief summary

As the world opens up to rapidly increasing vaccination coverage and newer variants, there is an even greater need for timely access to at-home COVID-19 testing, or self-testing based out of kiosks, offices, or private spaces. Data on digital strategies that complement self-testing are sparse. Using a superiority randomized controlled trial design (open-label, single-blinded), the investigators will aim to evaluate the impact of a digital self-testing strategy offered out of kiosks/private spaces on the turnaround time to test results, the proportion of participants initiated on action plans, and new infection detected with the strategy. The investigators will compare these outcomes to a conventional lab-based strategy. Significance: A digital, portable, self-testing strategy will facilitate rapid self-knowledge of COVID-19 status and rapid classification into clinical/quarantine/prevention plans. The study will document the impact of a digitally connected self-testing strategy for COVID-19 infection. Upon completion of the strategy, the digital program will be available for global dissemination.

Detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that a rapid digital self-testing strategy that evaluates the risk of severe COVID-19 infection and guides participants on the methods of self-test interpretation and ensuing action plans will be more impactful in detecting COVID-19 infection and will facilitate more participants to take an appropriate course of action compared to the conventional strategy. Action plans initiated will be either: a) clinical care, b) prevention (home quarantine, isolation), or c) social distancing. Taken together, these actions will impact health outcomes during the current and ensuing SARS-CoV-2 surges. Using a superiority randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, the investigators will randomize participants to either the App-based self-testing arm or the conventional testing arm (screening and testing performed by a health care worker (HCW) at the COVID-19 testing site). A confirmatory RT-PCR test will be performed in both arms. The standard of care will be offered in the conventional arm. The interventional strategy will be offered in kiosks/private spaces within COVID-19 testing sites or student health clinics. The COVIDSmart CARE! digital App-based program will be downloaded onto the test kiosk based tablets or participants' smartphones. This strategy will yield self-test results and guided action plans in a rapid turnaround time.

Interventions

DEVICEAbbott Panbio rapid antigen self-tests

COVID-19 self-testing will be performed using investigational Abbott Panbio rapid antigen self-test kits that require self-sampled nasal swabs.

OTHERCOVIDSmart CARE! app

Guided by the application that connects, educates, and communicates a digital, contactless open access strategy, participants will have the opportunity to self-test and assess their risk level of COVID-19 infection, as well as the option to refer their close contacts to testing for those who are COVID-19 positive, through the study platform.

Sponsors

University of Cape Town Lung Institute
CollaboratorOTHER
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SCREENING
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcome evaluator (statistician) will be unaware of the intervention allocation (single-blind).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years and above * All sexes and genders * Suspecting COVID-19 exposure * Symptomatic or asymptomatic for COVID-19 * Mental capacity to provide informed consent * Access to internet connectivity and digitally literate * Access to a smart device that can download and run the COVIDSmart CARE! App (e.g., Android tablet version 6 or higher).

Exclusion criteria

* Participants with serious mental health or clinical condition which limits their capacity to provide informed consent. * Those with apparent severe COVID-19 symptoms requiring urgent hospitalization (e.g., severe shortness of breath, impaired level of consciousness, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Estimating the impact on turnaround time (TAT) from the point of taking a test to initiating a clinical action plan.Less than 24-48 hoursTAT is estimated to be \<2 hours compared to 24 hours taken with a conventional RT-PCR test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The impact of the COVIDSmart CARE! self-testing strategy on the proportion of participants taking an appropriate COVID-19 related action compared to conventional COVID-19 testing strategies at 24 hours post randomization.Less than 24-48 hoursProportional estimates of participants who action the guidance given via the App compared to those who undergo standard of care testing will measure the efficacy of the App on changing behaviour and/or linkage to care.
Impact on detection of new COVID-19 infections in each arm.1 yearWe will document the impact of digital self-testing versus conventional testing on the number of new COVID-19 infections detected in each arm. We will compare and document the proportion of newly identified participants as test positives in both arms. Test positives and test negatives will be confirmed by lab confirmed results and test protocols.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic accuracy of COVIDSmart CARE! versus conventional reference standard.1 yearWe will compare the diagnostic performance of our interventional (digital self-testing strategy) versus conventional RT-PCR tested (a composite reference standard algorithm containing NAATs from a different manufacturer); with performance metrics (i.e., sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with 95% CI).

Countries

South Africa

Contacts

Primary ContactKeertan Dheda, MBBCh, PhD
keertan.dheda@uct.ac.za021 442 1816
Backup ContactAli Esmail, MD
ali.esmail@uct.ac.za021 442 1816

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026