Fibromyalgia
Conditions
Keywords
fibromyalgia, pain, manual lymphatic drainage
Brief summary
There are limited studies on the use of Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) in fibromyalgia syndrome. Considering the possible mechanisms of action of MLD and the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia, more studies are needed to fully determine the effect of MLD on this syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage on symptom severity, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold and anxiety about pain in fibromyalgia syndrome.
Detailed description
Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is a syndrome of unknown cause, characterized by numerous symptoms such as chronic widespread pain, fatigue, insomnia, joint stiffness, depression, concentration and memory problems, myofascial pain and tender points. The prevalence of FMS in the general population is 2%, and it is a common syndrome. There are studies showing that there is dysfunction in the connective tissue or fascia in FMS that triggers peripheral nociceptor stimulation. Any change in fascial tissue motility can cause an imbalance between body fluids leading to tissue hardening and accumulation of toxins. By stimulating the lymph vessels, metabolic waste products can be eliminated, excess fluid can be reduced, blockages can be removed and the immunological system can be regulated. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods are used in the treatment of FMS. Exercise, manual therapy techniques, cognitive behavioral treatments, patient education and other physiotherapy modalities are the non-pharmacological methods that are frequently used. Manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) was developed in 1965 by Dr. It is a manual therapy technique that consists of slow, rhythmic, superficial and repetitive movements defined by Vodder. Many effects that MLD can reveal locally and systemically are discussed. MLD; It stimulates the lymphatic and parasympathetic system, reduces pain, helps regulate the immune system, clears blockages, eliminates metabolic wastes and toxins in the body, and reduces excess fluid. There are limited studies on the use of MLD in fibromyalgia syndrome. Considering the possible mechanisms of action of MLD and the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia, more studies are needed to fully determine the effect of MLD on this syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of manual lymphatic drainage on symptom severity, pain intensity, pressure pain threshold and anxiety about pain in fibromyalgia syndrome.
Interventions
OTHERManual Lymphatic Drainage
Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD) is applied towards the flow direction of lymph vessels with special hand movements. MLD is made with very light, completely painless and rhythmic translational movements of the skin. MLD, by expert and trained physiotherapists (G.K, H.K) in this field. It will be applied with the techniques defined by Dr. Vodder. MLD ( to the neck region, abdominal region, axillary and inguinal lymph nodes) will be applied by following the lymphatic pathways specific to the anterior and posterior trunk, respectively. The treatment session will take approximately 45 minutes. It will be applied 5 days a week during 3 weeks.
DRUGMedical treatment
The patients in control group continued taking their regular gabapentin and pregabalin-derivative drug therapy at the same dosage and duration specified by their physicians.
OTHERSham Manual Lymphatic Drainage
Sham MLD will be administered by MLD-trained physiotherapists (G.K, H.K) with a protocol that is far from techniques that reveal the physiological effects of MLD. Sham application consists of applications that do not follow the lymphatic pathways from distal to proximal to the trunk, neck, and abdominal region, and superficial breathing. The session will take approximately 45 minutes.
Sponsors
Kutahya Health Sciences University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* have fibromyalgia as defined by the criteria of the 2016 ACR * have Turkish as their native language * between 18 and 65 years of age
Exclusion criteria
* Having cognitive impairment * Receiving routine physiotherapy and/or manual therapy, alternative/complementary therapies * Illiterate people * Diagnosed with endocrine, neuromuscular, infectious and inflammatory diseases * Diagnosed severe mental and psychological disorders * Having malignancy * Pregnant or people who breastfeed
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) | 10 minutes | Pressure pain thresholds in following three points, 7th cervical vertebra,6th thoracal vertebra and 3th lumbal vertebra were measured using a analog pressure algometer (Baseline, USA). |
| Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) | 5 minutes | The FIQ is an assessment and evaluation instrument developed to measure fibromyalgia (FM) patient status, progress and outcomes. |
| Visual Analogue Scale | 1 minutes | A 0-100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) will be used to assess pain intensity. The VAS is a scale on a straight line with a value of 0 indicating no pain intensity and a value of 100 indicating severe pain. Participants will be asked to mark the pain they feel on this line. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Concerns About Pain | 5 minutes | Participants' concerns about painwill be evaluated with the Washington University Pain-Related Worries Scale (UWCAP-TR), which was recently developed as a pain self-efficacy measure based on modern scale development approaches and adapted into Turkish by Saraçoğlu et al. UWCAP-TR consists of 8 questions and 2 parts. While the first part of the scale evaluates concerns about pain, the second part evaluates the individual's self-confidence in the face of pain. The scores of each section are collected and evaluated separately. Scoring of the scale is done with a 5-point Likert type scale. The first part is scored between 6-30, the second part is scored between 2-10. High scores on the UWCAP-TR indicate increased anxiety about pain and low confidence. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed